Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Friday, July 20, 2007

Plame Case Thrown Out;
National Security Imperilled



A federal judge has thrown out the lawsuit of Valerie Plame Wilson against Bush administration figures Irv Lewis Libby, Karl Rove, Richard Bruce Cheney, and Richard Armitage. She sued them for conducting a campaign to out her in the press as an undercover operative and so ruining her career.

The judge interpreted Cheney Inc.'s outing of Plame as just politics and something to be expected of political office-holders. That is, he believed their story that they were just defending themselves politically from what they saw as a Central Intelligence Agency attempt to smear them and their Iraq War. He admitted that their methods were "unsavory."

It is a ruling about the jurisdiction of the court and so something technical in the law about which I don't feel qualified to comment. Just as a citizen, I cannot understand how committing what was essentially an act of treason (or trying very hard to) can be seen as part of the ordinary political duties of incumbents.

The judgment will be appealed to the Supreme Court, but given the coloration of that court, one hardly expects the justices to rule against Bush-Cheney.

But the world has a kind of karma, and the United States will be punished for what Cheney Inc. did to Plame Wilson.

Think about it. She worked against nuclear proliferation, including with regard to Iran,with a "non-official cover" (NOC). She was an undercover operative with extremely sensitive duties.

So what are the big security challenges facing the United States in the next decade? They include the regrouping of al-Qaeda and the threat of nuclear proliferation.

What the United States therefore needs most to secure our country is smart, knowledgeable, skilled and dedicated counter-terrorism and counter- proliferation professionals. Without such persons, we are in danger of being hit hard by smart, knowledgeable, skilled terrorists.

But here is the problem. If you are a NOC, you are living a lie. Your very identity as CIA would potentially put everyone around you in danger, especially your friends, contacts and the agents you are running in foreign countries. You yourself could easily be assassinated on a trip abroad if your identity became known.

So you would depend for your survival and for the survival of your friends and contacts on the US government's willingness and ability to keep your identity secret. If you thought that the vice president might casually betray your identity if he thought it politically convenient to do so, you'd be crazy to put yourself in that position.

So, we've had the Plame Wilson affair, the profound hostility of Cheney Inc. to the reality-based CIA (for not going along with its fantasy machine), the Cheney project of blaming CIA director George Tenet for his own mistakes with regard to Iraq, and the changes and rotations in top personnel. Competent Middle East analysts like former Deputy Director of Intelligence Jami Miscik have been forced out.

So ask yourself, how many really smart competent people are going to volunteer to follow in Valerie Plame Wilson's footsteps and take all those risks for a job that does not pay all that well, knowing that the Cheney sorts might at any moment ruin their lives for petty political reasons?

So Bush and Cheney have deeply damaged recruitment, morale and efforts among our counter-terrorism agencies at the same time that their greedy and duplicitous occupation of a major Arab Muslim country, Iraq, is generating a new terrorist threat against the American homeland. They are creating the perfect storm.

So the judge threw out the lawsuit. But we will all be paying the damages.

Bush-Cheney have disarmed us and galvanized the enemy. They are traitors, and if something happens to America, it will be in some important part their fault.

Labels: ,

18 Comments:

At 3:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Time wounds all heels.

 
At 3:32 AM, Blogger daryoush said...

Juan,

You talk about possible national security compromise that may have resulted from outing Plame Wilson by the Vice President office.

I think the point you are missing is that Vice President's office knows full well that Iran is not a nuclear threat. Iran's nuclear threat is a good bogyman for pro Israel propaganda, but end of the day, the Vice President knows full well there is no nuclear arms program in Iran. If there was any such program IAEA would have uncovered it long ago.

 
At 4:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seeing the big picture beyond personal power and gain is not a strong point of the Bush Administration. Bush and Cheney lead the pack, of course, in personalizing all aspects of government for their daily jolt of power-aid. They disregard the law, the people, world opinion,human suffering, and the lessons of history. Before 9/11, Bush and his incompetent flunky, Condoleeza Rice, ignored all warnings about an impending terrorist attack. Then,they ignored all warnings about the destruction that would result from an invasion of Iraq. Reason and logic are considered anathaema to their fanatical neoconservative dogmas. In the final analysis, they have become much like cult members, i.e. impervious to reason. This is why they can readily harm the very country they purport to want to keep from harm, whether it is to damage our intelligence network, damage our world reputation, or threaten our security by allowing terrorism to thrive. They do not see beyond the framework or their dogma. Like the act of cherry-picking intelligence reports prior to the Iraq invasion, they cherry-pick all information. It must conform to THEIR agenda. If it does not, they ignore it or spin it, or villify it, or bury it in veils of secrecy. Because they basically function as a cult, they exclude anyone from their inner circle who is not a True Believer. This makes them very dangerous, indeed. They continually reinforce their own destructive agenda and keep out any facts that could give them a more realitic perspective. Cults do not want facts. They thrive on myths, on denial of reality, on secrecy and paranoia. When you look at these entities, you see them self-destructing rather than admitting that their dogma is harmful or a failure. They will often take as many others with them over the edge as they can, even forcing others to follow them into the void. What Congress and the Media refuse to acknowledge is that the current administration is not acting with reason nor even sanity. The most unlikely of men, Richard Mellon Scaife, himself a rogue, has seen this. If a hard-core, far-right supporter like Scaife is worried, how much more so should men like Lugar, Warner, et.al.,be, as well. But, they insist on saving face, allowing hubris to overcome reality, and keep up the pretense that this administration acts rationally. Instead, they and the Media should be looking at other cult outcomes like Waco and Jim Jones. I realize this sounds alarmist. But, if the overall loss of our freedoms is examined from the 2000 election on, the immensity of what is happening begins to take shape. Bush keeps giving himself more and more power by executive order; and elevating the executive branch to godlike status. The fox is in the henhouse. What do you think will be the results?

 
At 4:40 AM, Blogger Peter Attwood said...

It's important to understand that for people like Cheney, successful terrorist attacks are a good thing, good for the United States because these enable their kind to mobilize American fears so as to consolidate their beneficial rule. They in this way can lead the United States in glory to dominate the world forever and bring about the end of history.

Ever since they've come to power, they have doen everything to incite terrorism and taken care not to hinder it by such acts as enhancing port and border security.

Without 9/11, they would be long gone. You may be sure they haven't forgotten that for a minute, and they have been acting accordingly to that understanding ever since.

 
At 7:07 AM, Blogger TMEubanks said...

U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates, who issued this ruling, was appointed by... G.W. Bush in 2001. Before that, he was... Deputy Independent Counsel for the Whitewater investigation.

Does anyone think that we could expect a fair ruling from such a man ?

 
At 7:42 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Read Bob Altemeyer's on-line book called the "Authoritarians". The judge who ruled in Cheney's favor is obviously an "authoritarian". These types have an unbelievable ability to absolve authority figures(leaders of the country) of wrongdoing, while at the same time condemning ordinary folks most harshly. The disconnect is startling, but certainly easier to understand after having read his book.

 
At 9:47 AM, Blogger tfile59 said...

Peter...very interesting thoughts.
What, may I ask, do you think going to happen next?

 
At 9:48 AM, Blogger James-Speaks said...

Richard Bruce Cheney and George W. (don't know, don't really care) Bush are not merely evil, treacherous and ungrammatical, but similar to many in their common criminal peer group, they are also boring, ugly and not terribly good at doing an honest day's work.

Sadly, the American public is more likely to condemn them for the boring and ugly part than the evil, treacherous bumpkin part.

 
At 10:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It harmed not only recruitment of CIA agents. It completely destroyed recruitment of spies inside muslim countries. If you are a person being recruited to spy against your own country, and you know that cover of your CIA handler (and your personal security) can be destroyed for petty reason like that, would you not think some? Because it is secret, we will never know what happened to Plame's contacts she build during her dangerous career - most likely many of her friends and contacts are imprisoned or dead. People which risked their life to help us are imprisoned or dead, and we seems don't care.

 
At 1:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Juan, the remedy is impeachment, not federal tort claims. Why do we expect Fitzgerald, or some civil suit, to secure justice when the white house commits high crimes? Write your congressperson.
Dopper

 
At 1:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is sad, but true, that the Rethuglicans in power actually HOPE for a major (but not TOO major) attack on United States soil in the next 18 months as a way to solidify their power and pomote their ideology.

Why do they hate the concept of Democracy so? Is the Corporate State really THAT great?

 
At 3:00 PM, Blogger paddyshap said...

Juan,
I disagree with your predictions on how Cheney's actions will affect CIA's ability to recruit American agents in the future, but I whole-heartedly concur with the statements made by one "Anonymous" at 4:41.

The fact is that there will always be thousands of intelligent, ambitious Americans who seek to serve their country in an exciting manner that does not expose them to the same dangers as one would get from, say, the Marines. Add to that the cachet of one day being a "retired CIA official," and there is no shortage of people lining-up to join the CIA.

However, Anonymous' sentiments are right-on. If potential foreign sources are given reason to doubt the integrity of their agents, as Cheney's actions have given them, they are going to be less-likely to put themselves in harm's way and turn over sensitive information.

paddyshap

 
At 5:24 PM, Blogger John Koch said...

Someone writes: "The fact is that there will always be thousands of intelligent, ambitious Americans who seek to serve their country in an exciting manner that does not expose them to the same dangers as one would get from, say, the Marines."

Hate to disagree, but the pay is not so hot. The annual "polygraphic interview" serves as an annual check on non-conformity, and requires a chilling obligation to disclose everything about your life if your replies reveal a single "flutter," and (truth be known) demand that one be a glib liar about some thing that serves as the index of lies about other things.

The opportunities for advancement are not great. Most of the work is tedious and formula driven. If you work in the Mideast section, don't get any bright ideas. The script is more or less written in stone and very partial to one country there. The whole function might as well be outsourced to that country's sister agency, some of whose employees have better (often first name) access to top US authorities than you do. Native Arabic speakers are unlikely to pass security clearance or have a solid roster of relatives who have the right views or afinities.

Marines carry M-16s and can count on their buddies to back them up, even to the point to sacrificing their lives. CIA spooks, on the other hand, sometimes cannot even carry a pistol, will be disavowed by their employer in the event of capture or death, and get no parade.

There is no honorable discharge from the CIA. You spend the rest of your life subject to the "Company's" right to censor what you say or write. Generic analysts or DOI types who leave mid-career find themselves overqualified or incompetent for most of the jobs available in the private sector. This contrasts with a Marine, who gets a lifetime of bragging rights, a much broader alumni network, and post-service benefits.

 
At 6:14 PM, Blogger Bruce Wilder said...

The CIA record on protecting foreign sources is pretty awful. Every Soviet, who worked for the U.S., many of them from idealism, was outed and most were killed.

John Walker Lindh managed to get himself from Marin County to Afganistan, but the CIA never placed anyone anywhere near Osama -- proved by the failure of several attempts to kill or capture him.

Even now, the CIA stupidly processes most of its Iraqi agents thru Sudan -- a ridiculous policy that compromises efforts to reform Sudan, and results in what has to be the crappiest intelligence network in the Middle East.

 
At 8:27 PM, Blogger Sulayman said...

I think there's also a bigger component. American Muslims have shied very far away from many political jobs ever since.

Think about it, what Muslim-American diplomat can you think of besides Zalmay Khalilzad? In a time when we Americans badly need better PR, the best Bush can come up with is Sarah Hughes? Even Muslims for Bush couldn't do it. (Tucker Carlson slammed their leader Muhammad Ali Hassan on his show and tried to get him to condemn non-American Muslims as if he had some power over them). As a result of all this GOP hatemongering and islamophobia (and democrats hardly doing better; Pelosi withdrew an award to CAIR after the right scolded her), the end result is that Muslims are not willing to join the military or help in foreign policy. Where are we going to get Urdu-speakers? Farsi interpreters?

 
At 11:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sulayman,

reading your post was gut-wrenching. The parents of Muhammad Ali Hassan, Seeme and Malik, helped me get my MBA.
I really disagree with their politics (if I'm not mistaken, I think they are trying to persuade Newt to run for President,) but respect them as terrific community leaders. They live in the next town down the road from me.

Since I rely on the reality-based media, I don't often see Mr. Carlson's Faux News show. It is just staggering that he would attack the younger Mr. Hassan.
Chatting with him a few weeks ago at the Denver Fine Arts Center, he impressed me as a wonderful young man.

Avid Student

 
At 12:57 AM, Blogger tc said...

This is what they were aiming for: plant ideologues all over the place and your back will be covered, regardless of how despicable you act. Mission accomplished. It's really like Night of the Living Dead. Zombie officials sabotaging all hope of decency.

 
At 9:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

At the heart of this long planned neoconsevative bid for control is the neutering of the FCC, so that the news can be controlled. what happened to equal time and a requirement for unbiased reporting.
What happened to rules preventing too much media ownership in too few hands. This is a major issue among others that we need to write our congressmen about.
How did the conservative element manage to stack the courts to the extent that they have.
It could be that we won't even see the next election, if another "terrorist event occurs."
To say nothing for the fact that the 911 event needs to be investigated by a private panel.
There are an awful lot of unanswered questions regarding that.
Very scarry.
We need to impeach both Bush and Cheney as a preemptive strike before they can exercise dictatorial control in response to the next terrorist attack.
The office of homeland security is looking an awful lot like the SA in Germany, 70 years ago.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home