Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, June 23, 2008

Shenkman: Why the American People Were So Easily Bamboozled by the Bush Administration

Rick Shenkman, is the author of the just-published Just How Stupid Are We? Facing the Truth About the American Voter (Basic Books, 2008). He blogs at Howstupidblog and is editor of George Mason University's History News Network

Shenkman writes:


I do not wish to engage in a debate about the Iraq War. But the thought of planting a largely Christian army in the middle of the Muslim Middle East over the opposition of most countries in the region, when put as I have just put it, sounds daft. Why did it not ring bells of alarm to Americans in 2003 and after, especially as it became clear that our troops would be staying a long time and that no quick victory was possible? It did not because the administration saw to it that the issue was framed differently. We weren’t planting an army. We were spreading God’s miraculous gift of freedom to a benighted people very much in need of America’s missionary help. It was the triumph of myth over logic.


Why were Americans so susceptible to myth? Foreign policy specialists don't usually spend a lot of time reflecting on this question. They should. It's the key to what often goes wrong when foreign policy issues become the subject of public debate.

The answer is, I'm afraid, simple. Myths count more than facts in these debates because Americans don't know many facts and don't care to take the time to learn them. Unlike subjects with which they have first-hand experience--think gas prices--matters related to foreign countries are both exotic and incomprehensible to most Americans. This leaves them sitting ducks for wily pols who want to take advantage of their ignorance by playing on fear and patriotism.

The extent of Americans' ignorance is underestimated. Only two in five know we have three branches of government and can name them. Only one in five know there are 100 US senators. And five years into the war in Iraq only one in seven can find Iraq on a map. Someone once said--the author is in dispute--that war is God's way of teaching Americans geography. It's a great line, but rather optimistic. A majority of Americans still haven't bothered to take a look at the map of the country where we have been bombing and killing people since 1991.

Not all is grim. On the positive side, Americans did not make wholly irrational demands of their leaders after 9/11. American Muslims were not rounded up and sent to concentration camps after 9/11 (as Japanese-Americans were after Pearl Harbor). Mosques were not closed down. Nuclear weapons were not employed against our perceived enemies. And nobody was lynched. Given what has happened in American history any one of these responses or all of them might have been anticipated. That none occurred and that nothing like them occurred is worth noting.

But polls indicate that a significant segment of the American public was susceptible to wild conspiracy theories. A Scripps-Howard poll in 2006 found that 36 percent believe that it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that U.S. officials either allowed the attack to take place or were involved it.

Americans do not have a monopoly on conspiracy thinking. Nineteen percent of Germans said in a 2004 poll that 9/11 was the work of the CIA and Israel’s Mossad. The French turned Thierry Meyssan’s book The Appalling Fraud into a best-seller, despite the absence of evidence for its chief and crazy claim: that the Pentagon attacked itself on 9/11 with a cruise missile. Millions of Muslims around the world persist in believing that Jews were given advance warning of the attack on the World Trade Center.

But instead of the thoughtful debate we should by rights have had in this country, we settled for slogans:

We must fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here
The Global War on Terror (GWOT)
Mission Accomplished
You are either with us or with the terrorists
The axis of evil

To be sure the public eventually turned against Mr. Bush's war in Iraq. The one thing the public usually gets is success and failure. And Mr. Bush's war has been a spectacular failure when judged against all of the many measures by which he has asked us to judge it.

As we head into the Fall campaign and listen to the debates about the war we should keep in mind the limits of public opinion. If we don't begin to address the problem of gross public ignorance there will be more Iraqs.

One poll finding we should all keep in mind is this. Even after the 9/11 Commission reported that there was no connection between Saddam Hussein and the Sept. 11 attack 50 percent of the country persisted in believing there was. The implications of this are mind boggling.

Rick Shenkman
George Mason University


Labels:

26 Comments:

At 1:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've lived in Saudi Arabia and in Iran. I was young, my father was working for American oil companies. In spite of my age, I understood enough to realize that plopping down a Christian army in that region was a really, really dumb idea.
When I railed against that idea, in the pre-occupation period, I was met with blank stares by journalists working for leading media and by public officials.

In those "glorious" post-occupation days when the NeoCons grew hair on their chests and gravelly voices, I was told to observe how utterly wrong I was in my prognosis.

The stupid. It hurts ...

 
At 1:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The imprisonments at Guantanamo, the torture at Abu Ghraib, and the renditions to third countries amount to lynchings with official sanction.

 
At 2:59 AM, Blogger karlof1 said...

"Americans don't know many facts and don't care to take the time to learn them."

This isn't true. Both Juan and I are Americans; we know facts and take the time to learn them. As a teacher of history, econ, geography, and polysci, I made sure my students learned facts and were interested in learning them because it is important for them to know in the most base sense in that not knowing costs them money. But having said that, I do admit our indoctrination system works very well inculcating the Mythos and avoding uncomfortable facts.

An example of this is the just completed "extraordinary" conference on Oil Price held in Jeddah. I highly approve of this analysis of the conference and words said by Saudi actors over the years. A further, very detailed discussion of Saudi oil production is also available for those wanting to be distracted by facts.

The Iraqi Holocaust represents the failure of an Imperial Dream, which was itself built on its Mythos to "reorder the Middle East," which was code for saying taking control of all the hydrocarbon supplies. (Remember the Venezuelan Coup attempt in 2002was the first part of this plan, and it failed too for similar reasons related to the Mythos.) It is this Imperial venture that is there for all who want to see and makes its presence felt everytime you buy fuel or heating oil/gas. And while it's true that prices would still be higher than 2003, they would lkely be half of what they are today.

 
At 3:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought Bush bamboozled the uninformed public and the "informed" beltway alike by framing the WMDs as the causus belli.

 
At 3:19 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Interesting that this article turns against 9/11 truth at the end. Where did that curveball come from.

I am an Ivy League grad who is intimately aware of geo-political realities and the actors in the spaces of the Middle East and I also KNOW 9/11 was a lie.

You may be a writer, a sociologist or whatever "IST" you wish, but physics is a special place which actually has rules. Rules which were broken if you believe the story fed to us. PERIOD.

I know way too much about science to buy the lie. Hence I am left with nothing but questions.

Your hubris is great and your lumping in physics minded intelligence with a complete lack thereof in the mainstream geopolitical conscience is sad.

Tow the line - your line. No better than what you argue against.

And BTW - I have no answers to what happened - only NOT what we were told - as prescribed by rules such as gravity. Try learning some disciplines outside of Poli-sci and geography.

 
At 3:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i agree with all of this, except for one thing. i'm not a conspiracy theorist, but i do have questions. ONE question, actually. the qestion is: WHY did building 7 collapse into its own footprint at the speed of gravity on 9/11 WITHOUT having been it by an airplane?

why hasn't this question been answered?

that's my question.

i don't have any wacky theories. i just have this question.

it seems reasonable enough to me.

 
At 3:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Axiom of Evil: deny everything

 
At 4:56 AM, Blogger aarrgghh said...

the deception of the public occurs not in an atmosphere of ignorance. anyone who wanted to know the truth behind the bush administration's claims could find evidence against them easily enough.

this is all about willing self-deception and self-delusion and even willful ignorance, because determined ignorance certainly helps protect one's delusions.

you can't make anyone believe anything they don't already want to believe. and it's easy to lead someone down a path they're perfectly willing, even eager, to follow.

voltaire once remarked: "those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities."

if i may be allowed to correct him: "those who can help you believe absurdities, can help you commit atrocities."

 
At 5:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.aina.org/news/20080620194507.htm

The above link - showing a document purporting links between Iraw and Ayman Al-Zawahiri - is making the rounds in the blogosphere.

I wonder if Prof. Cole has any thoughts on this?

One data point does not upset the apple cart of previous thought, imo.

 
At 8:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hm. I suppose given that most people don't realize the extent of their ignorance, it can be considered a significant step to point it out, and attempt to open a conversation about it.

Having known for years that most of my fellow citizens know diddly and squat, however, I'm immediately curious what exactly Mr. Shenkman recommends to remedy this situation. I took a spin around his blog but didn't really even find a hint. (Other than his assurance that he doesn't really want civics testing for voters... an entirely reasonable idea which, I suppose, is therefore a non-starter.)

 
At 8:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only thing that matches this stupidity is the stupidity of thinking it's going to change anytime soon.

I don't sense any sense of chagrin on the part of the American people for failing to be better informed or to ask the most obvious questions. I don't even think they're angry about being spun and misled. As Shenkman implies, they're mainly angry at being spun and misled in a losing cause.

To even fall for this kind of spin in the first place required a certain sublime arrogance, and to quote "Citizen Kane" on arrogance: "You're going to need more than one lesson, Mr. Kane, and you're going to get more than one."

 
At 10:18 AM, Blogger Russ Wellen said...

I'm just finishing up Shenkman's book on what "the people" bring to the table in a democracy. Currently, looks like most of us are happy to sit at the kids' table. I heartily recommend "Just How Stupid Are We?"

 
At 10:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wrote about the mythic nature of our involvement in Iraq some time ago. It was fairly obvious to many people at the time:

http://donkephant.blogspot.com/2005/11/lets-see-if-we-can-agree-on-few-things_23.html

See also my comments here on the additionally mythic "War on Terror/Terrorism":

http://donkephant.blogspot.com/2006/05/winning-war-on-terror.html

All of this was not only a failure of leadership; it was also a massive failure of citizenship.

 
At 10:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The excerpt is a familiar recitation, of course, but I'm not sure what point it makes. It is well known that the American public is easily fooled by special interests. But that may be the reason we have a stable democracy. Little force is needed to guide the people in the "proper" direction. Electoral success is limited to Republicans or Democrats, where there is little substantive difference. R's and D's are not 180 degrees out of phase with each other-- more like 10-15 degrees. In the end, powerful special interests can get what they want without resort to violence. Secrecy, deception and corruption are perfectly adequate. Maybe that's what makes America strong.

 
At 10:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The human race ain't what it's cracked up to be.

We got a long way to go to get close to our own advance billing.

Reason, the little bolt of lightning that Michelangelo didn't paint zinging from the finger to finger on the Sistine Chapel is only used for creating hellfire missiles to be delivered with predators... and CDO's.

When it comes down to anything of value it's "hurrah for me and to hell with you!".

I guess I believe that the act of surviving this barbarity will eventually winnow out those genes. We will become a better race wily-nily, through natural selection; or disappear.

Reason will continue to have nothing to do with it.

Of course I might be wrong, so I urge you all to join the uspvp.org.

As Blaise Pascal once said: it takes a lot to laugh, it takes a train to cry.

 
At 10:38 AM, Blogger Charles D said...

Thanks for posting Prof. Shenkman's letter and the link to his book. Can't wait to read it.

Perhaps he is a bit optimistic to think that Americans are less susceptible to mythology about subjects like gas prices. We have millions of people responsive to such utter claptrap as a "temporary" cut in the gasoline tax, or drilling in the ANWAR, or getting tough with the Saudis as an answer to high gas prices. Those are little more than reflections of myths: tax cuts are always good, there is a never ending supply of resources to support our lifestyle, America has a right to control world resources since we are the greatest nation ever.

 
At 11:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shenkman is being a bit hypocritical here. His HNN website consistently publishes people like Daniel Pipes and other myth-making nut jobs who are directly reponsible for perpetuating these types of idiocy. If he really believes this, then he should start excising this ridiculous content from the website he oversees. I finally got fed up and canceled the email notices after getting recognizing the pattern of constantly getting only right-wing nonsense on anything involving the Middle East. (To be fair, Cole was periodically cited as well, but those who espoused these types of views were a distinct minority).

 
At 12:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I reflexively consider all information provided by the U.S. so-called government to be NOT true. Everything it promotes and claims is a lie until proved otherwise as far as I'm concerned.

Thanks, but I'll carry on being stupid and take nothing at face value as presented by the Washington liars club or anyone who is encouraging me to trust it.

.

 
At 1:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I find this kind of talk especially counterproductive. Lord Chesterton put it well: "There is nothing that people bear more impatiently, or forgive less, than contempt: and an injury is much sooner forgotten than an insult."

There is a difference between intelligence and education. One can be well-educated and fairly stupid and one can be a genius with little education at all.

America is the most powerful country in the world. There are therefore financial incentives to knowing, say, something about what happens in Washington, DC, while remaining completely ignorant of the rest of the world. The courtier of a President or Senator, etc., trains himself so that he might have more influence over those who wield the levers of power than someone who might be well-informed, but impolitic.

People in America, like most other places, are interested in what effects their well-being economically and otherwise. They therefore tend to know a lot about local issues which they understand, have first hand access to, and have the ability to do something about.

On the other hand, they are not especially interested in the Middle East which usually has little to no bearing on their day-to-day activities. It takes a long time to become informed enough about any subject in order to think about it effectively.

When even the top oil economists seem to get it wrong--see Verleger's testimony before the Senate last December--why would you expect the guy who has no time, and often no aptitude, to study the issue to be somewhat indifferent to the particulars?

What was missing was common sense. Common sense is hard to maintain after you've seen your fellow citizens murdered. Common sense says: listen to those who know more about these things and pay attention. It also says: be careful about trusting those people who show you contempt. Bush wasn't very demonstrably contemptuous until Katrina. Plenty of top notch intellectuals, journalists, and members of the NGO community were.

 
At 1:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

aaaaarrrggghh
was on the right track with his/her comments about self-delusion and willful ignorance. Those are signs that most of the problem is not cognitive and rational but psychological and unconscious. I recommend two chapters that Walter A. Davis posted on the web from his recent book, "Death's Dream Kingdom: The American Psyche Since 9-11." One is about Iraq explicitly, and the other is called, "Bible Says: The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism." It's somewhat challenging reading but well worth the effort invested. It will help you understand why all these supposedly "stupid" people believe the absurdities they do and seem utterly resistant to contrary evidence.

His main point: Ideology is not primarily about ideas (true or false) but about constructing a world view that enables people to FEEL emotionally the way they want to feel.

Most Amerikans desperately want to feel like their country always does the right thing in the world, or at least it tries to. All facts must be bent to fit with that unconscious ideological assumption.

There may be ways to combat this problem, but it isn't easy. I've drafted a set of "survey questions" designed for small groups of people in churches to use to start discussions about whether the USA is God's chosen country or not.

 
At 2:57 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Shenkman is an highly educated man but he is also highly arrogant. "Just How Stupid Are We?" not only implies he is more intelligent than us but to disagree with him means we are just plain stupid. As has been mentioned he propagates myths about the Middle East through his own editorial decisions. If he is truly more intelligent than me then he should at least work to properly inform his audience. Does his failure to better inform his audience make him worse than ignorant Americans?

His statistics are well known and difficult to fully comprehend. We all know that it is frighteningly difficult to have an intelligent conversation with our fellow citizens but to lump together people who lack a basic understanding of geography with the 911 truth movement is ludicrous. I do not need an Ivy League degree or advanced degree to understand that 9-11 was a new Reichstags.

 
At 4:46 PM, Blogger adam1285 said...

I'm not sure if you agree with this elitist rhetoric, Dr. Cole, but this guy shenkman ignores the systematic deception both in the media, government and intelligence agencies in the the US that prepped the public to support the invasion in Iraq. Despite that deception, on the eve of the invasion the largest global anti-war movement had emerged protesting the US' aggression.

Blaming the majority of American citizens for initially supporting the invasion on stupidity is like saying that poverty is a result of individual failure, it ignores the structural and societal influences that shape such conditions.

 
At 5:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, there are individual Americans who are very smart, but as a collective we often act rather stupidly. That's the real point and there's no debating it. We don't know things, we make stupid mistakes as a result of not knowing things, and we don't even realize they're mistakes because myths are so much easier to digest than complex, factual realities. If you haven't read the article (http://www.propublica.org/feature/alhurra-middle-east-hearts-and-minds-622) about what a trainwreck our efforts to have a pro-American radio station and television network in the Middle East have been, do so. It's an individual case study in how ignorance in Americans translates into American stupidity.

 
At 6:11 PM, Blogger MonsieurGonzo said...

Approximately 2 out of 3 Americans, and a majority of the American electorate have opposed the "War" = Occupation of IRAQ since at least mid-2006. Yet we remain Over There, in situ: though American politics has changed, the American policy has not.

imho, the question is not : "How stupid are Americans?"

Rather, the question is : "How un-democratic, really, can the American government be?"

We already know that the military occupation of IRAQ cannot be sustained... just as Herr Speer informed Hitler in 1942: "we simply do not have enough gold" = currency value left in the USD to sustain War. The War Economy isn't working. The "it's all about the OIL" deal, whether it was ever real or not, is now historically moot: The OIL deal didn't pencil, Professor. After all, The U.S. Military is the Largest Purchaser of OIL in the World:

This passive narrative, that "The high price of oil is a result of China and India," etc., and this PEAK OIL propaganda (that entirely ignores the commodity = currency destruction inherent by-product of the western War Machine) is rubbish, imho: There is no evidence of any slack supply, nor are there long queues at western petrol pumps, etc. What we are really witnessing is not simply the history writ of a commodity -on- credit bubble; nor is it some Malthusian dis-equillibrium of supply and demand. Rather, imho it is the collapse of USD = western currency as a result of the cost of commodity extraction by militant, neo-colonial mechanism.

So what does it mean, how "stupid" = naive or self-delusional are Americans being when they accept at face value this 'CHANGE' message mantra that Senator Obama espouses... as if He, or We, the People have any real 'CHOICE'?

i submit that Americans are an impotent, not simply an ignorant peoples. By all accounts our historical mythos: THAT WE HAVE A 'CHOICE', by our voice... that "We are a non-militant Democracy"... is this not our most consistent self-delusion déjà vu, Professor?

 
At 6:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree totally with Adam1285. Shenkman tries to shift the blame from the government and the media to the American people. The American people were not demanding the internment of Japanese Americans; that demand came from the U.S. military, the federal government, and probably some real estate interests who spotted an opportunity to seize homes, businesses, and farms. The corporate media did little to discourage people from believing that Saddam Hussein was tied to 9/11 and Fox News actively promoted the nonexistent link. The media also used the favorite totalitarian trick of endless repetition, constantly showing Saddam Hussein firing his shotgun and airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center. Those clips were so relentless, some people might have favored the invasion just so they wouldn't have to see them again. And as for conspiracy theories, when the government routinely lies, who wouldn't be susceptible to conspiracies. Wouldn't any reasonable person wonder why Bush was so complacent after reading a daily brief titled, "Bin Laden Determined to Attack in U.S."? The true wonder is that 70 percent of Americans are demanding an end to the occupation of Iraq despite repeated misinformation from the media and the White House.

 
At 11:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes Americans are ignorant and stupid. The basics of Muslim societies that I learned in junior high school (I'm 56) plus reading the papers made the fantasy we were being fed totally implausible.

However, the mass media made no effort to bring different opinions or historical facts (British failures, Russian failures) to our attention pre-war. There was no critical thinking or dispassionate discussion of the realities, only the slogans.

The mass media has yet to acknowledge its part in parroting the Bush lies.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home