Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, June 22, 2008

The Real State of Iraq

American television loves natural disasters. The Burmese cyclones that may have carried off as many as 200,000 people offered the cameras high drama.



The floods in Wisconsin, Iowa and Missouri along the Mississippi River, which have wiped out thousands of homes, have been carefully detailed hour by hour.



But American television is little interested in the massive disaster blithely visited upon Iraq by Washington. Oh, there is the occasional human interest story. Angelina Jolie's visit sparked a headline or two. Briefly.



By now, summer of 2008, excess deaths from violence in Iraq since March of 2003 must be at least a million. This conclusion can be reached more than one way. There is not much controversy about it in the scientific community. Some 310,000 of those were probably killed by US troops or by the US Air Force, with the bulk dying in bombing raids by US fighter jets and helicopter gunships on densely populated city and town quarters.

In absolute numbers, that would be like bombing to death everyone in Pittsburgh, Pa. Or Cincinnati, Oh.

Only, the US is 11 times more populous than Iraq, so 310,000 Iraqi corpses would equal 3.4 million dead Americans. So proportionally it would be like firebombing to death everyone in Chicago.

The one million number includes not just war-related deaths but all killings beyond what you would have expected from the 2000-2002 baseline. That is, if tribal feuds got out of hand and killed a lot of people because the Baath police were demobilized or disarmed and so no longer intervened, those deaths go into the mix. All the Sunnis killed in the north of Hilla Province (the 'triangle of death') when Shiite clans displaced from the area by Saddam came back up to reclaim their farms would be included. The kidnap victims killed when the ransom did not arrive in time would be included. And, of course, the sectarian, ethnic and militia violence, even if Iraqi on Iraqi, would count. And it hasn't been just hot spots like Baghdad, Basra, Mosul and Kirkuk. The rate of excess violent death has been pretty standard across Arab Iraq.

As for the Iraqis killed by Americans, like the 24 civilians in Haditha, the survivors are not going to be pro-American any time soon. The US can always find politicians to come out and say nice things on a visit to the Rose Garden. But the people. I don't think the people are saying nice things in Arabic behind our backs.

The wars of Iraq-- the Iran-Iraq War, the repressions of the Kurds and the Shiites, the Gulf War, and the American Calamity, may have left behind as many as 3 million widows. Having lost their family's breadwinner, many are destitute.

Although it is very good news that the number of Iraqis killed in political violence fell in May to 532 according to official sources, the number was twice that in March and April. And,it should be remembered that independent observers have busted the Pentagon for grossly under-reporting attacks and casualties. If someone shows up dead and they aren't sure exactly why, it isn't counted as political violence, just as an ordinary murder. Attacks per day are measured by whether the mortar shell scratches any US equipment when it explodes. If not, it didn't happen. McClatchy estimated a year and a half ago that attacks were being underestimated by a factor of 10.

By the way, isn't is a little odd that the death rate fell in the month of the Great Mosul Campaign? I conclude that either it can't have been much of a campaign or someone is cooking the death statistics.

But over 500 a month dead in political violence is appalling enough. The Srebenica massacre in 1995 killed 8,000. At the average rate of death in Iraq this winter and spring, a similar massacre will have been racked up in 2008. In the Northern Ireland troubles over 30 years, about 3,000 people died, and it was widely considered a bad situation. That death toll is still being achieved every 6 months in Iraq according to the official May statistics.

And, of course, by the rule of 11,that death toll would be like nearly 6,000 Americans dying in political violence every month, or 72,000 a year. (Note that this 72,000 figure would only be political deaths, since it does not include criminal homicides). The annual total murder rate in the US is about 16,000, including political violence, what little there is. The US is one of the most violent societies on earth, and Iraq in May makes it look like a pacifist convention.

In these situations, typically 3 persons are wounded for every one killed. In Iraq, I suspect it is higher, because US bombings and guerrilla bombings are such a big part of the violence. But let us be conservative.

That would mean 3 million Iraqi wounded in the past five years.



Equivalent to 33 million Americans wounded, that is, the entire state of California crippled or in bandages.

As for the displaced (i.e. homeless), they amount to a startling 5 million persons. There were 1.8 million internally displaced in January of 2007, and by December it had risen to 2.4 million. There are 2.3 million externally displaced, 2 million of them in Jordan and Syria.



In fact 5 million displaced persons is almost the entire population of nearby countries such as Jordan or Israel! 5 million is about the number of Jews in Israel, for instance. In absolute numbers, that is how many Iraqis are living in some other country or some other province, having lost their homes.

Some 1.4 million Iraqis are stuck in Syria, many becoming increasingly penniless. Another 500,000 to 800,000 have been displaced to Jordan, which has now closed its borders to them. Please read this excellent piece of reporting, which points out that the US has done diddly squat for these millions of people upon whom it has visited a world class catastrophe, neither allotting meaningful amounts of aid nor admitting more than a token number as immigrants. Sweden has admitted 40,000 Iraqis, nearly 4 times what the US even plans to. Please write the Senate and the Congress and demand that something be done for these, our victims.

40% of Iraq's middle class is outside the country.

Very few of the refugees abroad have returned, only a few thousand. Only 12% of the returnees say they are going back because they think it is safe now, according to UN border polls.

The refusal of the refugees to return makes me suspicious of the good news stories about security improvements in Iraq. There is an Arabic proverb that "The people of a house know best what is in the house."

2 Shiite brothers who returned home to Baquba an hour northeast of Baghdad were just kidnapped and killed by Sunnis.

5 million displaced Iraqis would be like 55 million displaced Americans, or the equivalent of everybody in California and New York combined

American commentators peculiarly lack a social dimension to their analyses. So if PM Nuri al-Maliki sends some troops up to Mosul and the guerrillas there lie low for a while, that is "progress" and "good news." Well, maybe it is, I don't know.

I do know that the apocalypse that the United States has unleashed upon Iraq is among the greatest catastrophes to befall any country in the past 50 years. It is a much worse disaster over time than the Burmese cyclone or the Mississippi floods.

You won't see it on television very much these days.

Even if it gets better, it won't get better very fast for all those millions wounded, widowed, orphaned, and displaced; as for the 1 million dead, as they say in Arabic, God have mercy on them (Allah yarhamhum). Maybe it will get better sooner for the politicians in the Green Zone. They are the sort of people that the think tanks in Washington seem to care about.

McClatchy reports political violence in Iraq on Saturday:


' Baghdad

- Around 1 p.m. a bomb planted in the car of the office manager of the Iraqi minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research exploded in Al Tobchi neighborhood injuring three including the minister's office manager.

- Around 4 p.m. a bomb planted in a civilian car exploded in Al Nidhal Street injuring two Iraqi employees of a local LG Company branch.

- Around 5 p.m. a bomb planted in a police vehicle exploded in Al Andalus square injuring two policemen.

- Police found two dead bodies throughout Baghdad; one in Al Baladiyat, one in Mansour.

Diyala

- Police found the bodies of two brothers, Ali and Mohamed Zaid, in Al Tahrir neighborhood in Baquba . . .

Kirkuk

- Around 8 a.m. a car exploded in central Kirkuk injuring the two passengers in the car. Police said they suspect the two passengers were planning a car bomb attack. The two suspects are under investigation, police said.'

Labels:

49 Comments:

At 6:02 AM, Blogger El Cid said...

I noticed that you wrote a long column with all kinds of numbers and facts and stuff.

Wouldn't it have been easier and more patriotic to have just written "The Surge Is Working" over and over and over?

That seems to be enough for a lot of people.

 
At 6:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well said. I said from the outset that they just want to turn Iraq into a big parking lot for their oil tankers and at this rate, that is exactly what they are achieving. Where is the outrage of the fabled "world community" when you need it? If Saddam had presided over a disaster of this magnitude, even I would have been pro-war!!!

 
At 6:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The mad, murdering mayhem visited upon Iraq by the NeoCons, Cheney and Bush the Clueless will come to light one day, and it will be the shame of us all.

The complicity of the media in keeping this atrocity under wraps will also come to light - but by then it will be too late for the hundreds of thousands of civilian dead and the millions of displaced.

What we will be able to savor is the revenge visited upon us by those who have had their family members tortured, murdered and obliterated by the U.S. If the goal of this foray into the Middle East really was to spread freedom and democracy, in a "fight against terrorism," then it can only be judged a total failure: we have created innumerable terrorists, and we have not spread freedom nor democracy.

 
At 7:09 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is more:

A million widows and five million orphans with no support.

The most corrupt system in the world.

The highest unemployment rate in the world at 60%, even higher than the Gazan, despite enormous human and natural resources.

But the American people want to believe the crap they are being fed. It maintains the illusion that they are civilised or even caring!

The solution, however, is in the hands of the Iraqis,not the cowardly Americans.

 
At 8:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I do know that the apocalypse that the United States has unleashed upon Iraq is among the greatest catastrophes to befall any country in the past 50 years. It is a much worse disaster over time than the Burmese cyclone or the Mississippi floods.

Others can say such things Juan Cole, but ears prick up when you speak.

There are anti-War candidates, although unbelievably ending this "greatest catastrophe to befall any country in the past 50 years" is on everyone's back burner!

Ralph Nader has pledged to have all American troops home by 20 June 2009. Ralph Nader is no Barak Obama. He is a man of integrity.

I must vote for a candidate who will end the war. I am unwilling to remain a war criminal.

 
At 9:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's curious how a military which for years famously had no idea how many civilians were being killed in Iraq ("we don't do body counts") can suddenly produce accurate numbers to show how dramatically they are declining. Am I the only person to find this strange?

I'll believe the situation has improved in Iraq when I see reporters transmitting that fact while not being protected by a platoon of Marines.

 
At 9:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"American television loves natural disasters. The Burmese cyclones that may have carried off as many as 200,000 people offered the cameras high drama."

American television loves dramatic breaking news. It likes the emotion of natural disasters-- the pain of loss-- but only for a time. Soon enough it becomes old news and leaves the screen to make room for the next breaking news. American TV loved the Iraq war back in the good old shock & awe days. A phosporous bomb looks great on TV. They loved the explosions, the retired generals, the checkpoint killings. But Iraq no longer brings in the viewers, thus no longer brings in the ad revenues. Ad revenues determine access to the TV distribution system. That's what make the internet revolutionary-- so far. Lots of people can broadcast a message.

 
At 9:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most excellent post, Professor Cole.

Enough to make one weep with frustration, despair, anger and hatred.

But all is well in the end as now the usa has the Oil under Iraqi soil firmly in its grip.

And that is really what the War Criminal Invasion and Occupation was all about, isn't it?

We all knew it was once cheney held those secret energy meetings with ken ( enron ) lay back in 2000, complete with maps of Iraq.

And with gasoline at $4 / gallon, most amerikan sheeple have lost their consciences, and what's a few dead / displaced brown muslim folk if the price of gasoline does not rise further or actually drops?

Happy Days Are Here Again.

 
At 9:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am reading Richard Engel's "War Journal: My Five Years in Iraq." His evaluation of what's going on there is the most revealing and surprising account I've read. If it is true, and I have no reason to doubt it, we're still being lied to, a military solution is merely a pipedream and the U.S. is in for a huuuuge humiliation, as were the British in 1920. If you read the book, I'd love to hear your take on it.

Reno Bailey
Charlotte, NC

 
At 11:49 AM, Blogger Scott Harrop said...

Good observation about the US corporate media prefers focusing in endless depth on the destruction along the rivers here (in part exacerbated by unwise river-works) but little coverage of the ongoing carnage in Iraq -- or the neocon efforts to start a war with Iran. We may anticipate the connection that eventually will be made (but probably only in off-the-reservation news sources) that the US is quite short on the skilled manpower that will be needed to shore up (if you will) the river "fortifications." For example, the Army Corps of Engineers is stretched to the max & the related National Guard engineering units that specialize in "horizontal construction" have been rotated so frequently into Iraq that they're gutted and demoralized. I should know -- my son's Virginia engineering unit is slated to go back to Iraq this fall (less than 3 years after their last tour -- so much for the 5 year "promise" from Gates) And guess what they're being told will be their top duty ? (when not clearing mines and ied's) to build "earthenwork fortifications" -- around cities and villages.... (e.g. -- strategic hamlets redux -- except with bigger walls made from sand....) Meanwhile, will the media make the connection that there's a considerable national shortage of Army National Guard Engineers and their equipment -- given that they're over "there" on a fool's errand.

 
At 12:10 PM, Blogger Santa Rosa New School Aikido said...

Our government should be doing more to help the suffering of this nation and it's so important that we citizens do what we can to make this support manifest.

We can also help as individuals. 100% of your donation to the Iraqi Red Cross is devoted to providing food, medical supplies, tents, blankets and cooking equipment to displaced Iraqis, families headed by widows, and others who are struggling.

The volunteer workers of the IRC go where no other aid organizations dare. Scores of workers have been murdered, others kidnapped. Their offices in Baghdad have been bombed, their ambulances have been strafed by U.S. copters and snipers, and by various militias. They serve the people of Iraq, as many of them as they can reach.

If you are so moved, you can make a donation through this link: http://www.redcross.int/en/default.asp
(please specify Iraq Humanitarian Response when asked where to direct your contribution).

Thank you for today's post, Juan. You bring things vividly into perspective.

 
At 12:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Cole,
This is the best "perspective" I have ever read.
Our endless reporting of 4000 dead American's just doesn't stir the senses of most people. But, when we add the approximately 30,000 wounded Americans, plus the likelyhood that several hundreds thousand more have PTSD, it becomes more real.
But, when you add "enemy" figures AND all the innocent casualty figures, it takes on holocaust proportions.
But, what I really liked was your "equivalency" reporting. Those numbers really hit home with me. The 33 million injured figure is like the entire populations of Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, both Dakotas, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas and Nebraska...being wounded.
Of course it would be far worse for us, since our wounded would be mostly white.
Keep up the great work.
Terry

 
At 1:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Cole,

I felt your piece of about two years ago offering equivalents to the Iraqi war toll in terms of the California population to be one of the best letters to America anywhere about the human cost of this war. The human cost of war is, after all, the single most important result of war. Your piece of today ranks in importance with that posting. Even more than the “clear and present danger” of Hussein’s purported possession and intent to somehow use WMD’s to attack the US, the ultimate bedrock of the Bush administration’s drive toward war with Iraq was a propaganda driven, bulked-up public outrage at the genocidal crimes of Saddam Hussein. The numbers cited at that time supporting the view of Hussein as a genocidal maniac were most often 300,000 to 400,000 Iraqis killed by Hussein during his 25 year reign. These numbers have never been appreciably improved, and will forever be very vague. The highest figure of approximately 5 millions, gleaned from the Iraqi government’s own figures, and orders from the Kurdish campaign including the detention of all males from 15 to 70, indicates that 400,000 may well only be a fraction of the total.

The genocide figures from Hussein’s reign continue to have relevance today. I just reviewed every photo in the ninety-seven pages of Iraqi mass grave photographs found at:
http://www.9neesan.com/massgraves/
Among them I found a photo of Donald Rumsfeld surveying a mass grave scene. The US had supplied Hussein with weapons and WMD precursors and technology, in which Rumsfeld had a direct role, knew about Saddam Hussein’s Kurdish genocide as it was happening, and continued to consider Hussein as an ally. There is a reasonable possibility that Rumsfeld was surveying the gravesite of people whose deaths he enabled.

The genocide coin has two faces. Google the images of the destruction of Fallujah, completed in the quest to eradicate a few thousand “terrorists”, who were mostly anti-occupation insurgents, to view the other face. If America took Hussein’s genocide seriously—and it did in sufficient measure to support his eventual execution—then it cannot possibly ignore the role of the Bush administration in the results you detail in today’s posting. Genocide resulting from America’s imposed and self-defeating destruction of Iraqi military and police national peace-keeping forces, and from the economic and physical destruction of the Iraqi culture on a witch hunt for fabricated WMDs and terrorists, is still genocide. The figures you cite indicate are the responsibility of the principals of the Bush administration. Americans can chose to do nothing about this, but only if they can maintain the illusion that the rest of the world does not clearly see what the Bush administration has wrought.

 
At 1:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Establishment media and the Establishment political parties are components of the disinfo matrix. They run errands for the so-called government of the United States. The favorite technique of the Establishment media is to repeat common distractions endlessly:

Ethyl: Gee Henry, aren't those floods terrible?

Henry: Yes they are.

Ethyl: And isn't that too bad about Tim Russert?

Henry: Yes it is.

Moderately aware person: Henry and Ethyl, what do you think about the accusations Sibel Edmonds made against both the United States and israeli governments?

Ethyl: Huh?

Henry: I don't know what you're talking about.

The End.

.

 
At 1:52 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

"By now, summer of 2008, excess deaths from violence in Iraq since March of 2003 must be at least a million. This conclusion can be reached more than one way. There is not much controversy about it in the scientific community."

Who are you trying to fool? You discredit yourself.

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMsa0707782
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~jewell/LancetNov061.pdf
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~jewell/lancet061.pdf
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/01/28/2003346700
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/analysis/beyond/reality-checks/
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/lib.nsf/db900sid/PANA-7DZCL8/$file/cred_jun2007.pdf?openelement
http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/databomb/index.htm
etc. etc. etc. etc.

"But over 500 a month dead in political violence...."

Gee, only 32 times lower than the monthly average of your "million" (said to be all or almost all violenct deaths by your "more than one" sources). Someone should tell Petraeus about this miraculous development.

 
At 2:17 PM, Blogger Juan Cole said...

O, ptaglia:

You cannot refute epidemiological surveys with passive information collection from wire services. In such conflicts, the press typically only reports about 20% of actual deaths from political violence.

The 531 figure for May is understated, as I suggested. I called it the 'official' figure and deployed it for heuristic purposes, pointing out that even if we accepted it, it would not make Iraq paradise.

I don't know what is worse, what the US has done to Iraq or the ways in which Republican propagandists have effectively covered up one of history's great crimes.

I'm comfortable with my own credibility, thank you.

 
At 2:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lets not forget the 600,000 dead children as a result of pre-invasion sanctions. Sec of State Albight said their deaths were "worth it"

 
At 2:34 PM, Blogger Chuck Cliff said...

Indeed, your credibility is not only well established but is quite credible, Prof. Cole.

Again and again, many thanks for your efforts to continue to water this oasis of information which not not only includes excellent essays by yourself and others, but excellent links for those who might wish to go further on their own.

 
At 2:58 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

"In such conflicts, the press typically only reports about 20% of actual deaths from political violence."

No it doesn't Juan. That is a complete fabrication which you lifted from the "Lancet study" (one of many factual fabrications in the "study"):
http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Standards.pdf
(see section 3.8).

Likewise, your disgusting description of journalists and others putting their lives on the line and dying to collect so-called "passive information" is also nothing but a fraudulent rhetorical fabrication from the Lancet study. Try to find a description of conflict journalism claiming it is "passive" prior to the Lancet study. You won't find one. And for good reason. It is a completely illogical rhetorical fraud invented by the Lancet study.

Furthermore, if you would see the first link I posted, it is a peer-reviewed household survey by the WHO, which concludes that the Lancet greatly exaggerated violent deaths (the 2004 UNDP survey shows the same thing). Furthermore, all of the links show - not just "controversy" - but wide *disbelief* in the figures you pretend are facts.

Furthermore, your sources "ORB" and "Just Foreign Policy" are not "epidemiological studies". The first is an opinion polling firm who gives no details about their methods and who had never once done a mortality estimate prior to the one you cite. The second is a website which cherry-picks one of the two Lancet studies and builds nonsensical extrapolations on top of it.

Again, who are you trying to fool?

"I'm comfortable with my own credibility".

If true, that is a crying shame. You discredit yourself by promoting fraudulent claims.

 
At 3:05 PM, Blogger Juan Cole said...

So then there has been no genocide in Darfur. Les Burnham's *student* estimated that one with the same methods.

I've seen lots of Iraqi deaths reported in the Arabic press that never get mentioned in the wire services. Indeed, the wire services only report political deaths, not deaths stemming from lack of order, which can also be laid at the door of the US invasion.

Passive reporting gives us only a fraction of what is going on.

 
At 3:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Cole what source are you using to say that US forces are only responsible for 310,000 or 1/3 of the war related deaths? I fail to see that figure used in any of the three links you provided.

 
At 4:20 PM, Blogger Juan Cole said...

anonymous 3:43:

Take another look at the second Lancet study. Respondents blamed Coalition forces for 31% of deaths.

 
At 4:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I suppose we, the "American People," should thank Bush and Cheney for helping us to discover our true dark cultural character, our true nature.

If there were an ounce of decency in our character there would be millions of us in the streets in opposition (as I was in San Francisco in February, 2003).

 
At 4:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Juan,

May God bless you! It is through you and the like of you, the great sons and daughters of America, that I maintain some hope that we are still humans and have not become monsters. I am everyday reminded of Vishnu's saying "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds".

Perhaps you wish also to devote some space to the irreparable damage that has been caused, and is being caused every day of the year, to the historical monuments and the national heritage of Iraq. I have understood that there are armed gangs who just roam the country and dig out the national heritage of the country, subsequently to sell on the black market. No records are held of the locations where these artefacts are dug, so that the history of ancient Mesopotamia is being destroyed as I am writing these words. It is said that to destroy a nation, first the history of that nation, their collective memory, should be destroyed. It appears therefore that not only the living Iraqi people are suffering the consequences of this war of choice, but the future generations of that nation will have left nothing of their ancient history to fall back on.

With my most cordial regards, BF.

 
At 6:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In this sad chain of commentary on the 6 years of apocalypse in Iraq, I am encouraged by the number and quality of responses.

God help us understand that war is not a movie, that combatant deaths are just the 'newsworthy' and 'heroic' edge of the war mortality iceberg. That bombs are never smarter than the choice to go to war, that infant dysentary, hunger and food poisoning, robbery and highway mayhem are the most frequent killers, and most often visited on the weakest citizens and refugees.

I would add what seems a quibble, in the face of more than a million in Iraq war mortality. The "4000 plus some" US KIA's, repeated ad nauseum, is pretty severe under-reporting in itself. More than 1000 US contractor deaths have been reported under Dept of Labor rules. If you also add in coalition military and non-US contractor deaths, the occupation has probably lost well upwards of 6000 killed in Iraq.

If the smallest part of our war mortality cost, the part that DoD is willing to admit tallying, if that is understated by 50%, consider the 30 and 60:1 kinetic kill ratios that super-modern American and Isreali style armies aspire to. That's the kind of attrition needed to make waging war 'cost effective'.

Coalition arms killed maybe 100,000 Iraqi Shiite and Kurd conscripts in 1990, at a cost of less than 200 KIA's. Why is it unthinkable that we would kill 300,000, in 6 years of far less controlled urban combat, at a cost of more than 4000 American KIA's? The way we train for war says that is what we were trying to do, with the millions of real bullets fired from American guns in Iraqi cities and villages.

And as has been discussed above, documented thru scientific sampling in the study links Prof. Cole provides, the suffering and dying continues after the 'conflict zone' is 'pacified'. In epidemiological terms, the loss of a breadwinner often puts a poor family in danger for at least a generation.

The toll in Iraq has been much worse than either the mainstream 'news', or our Democratic leadership has been willing to own up to. I'm sure the Juan Cole's hate being right about the dying.

The dark side voices are working overtime to fill the bandwidth with their 'surge is working' narrative.

Will we learn from this disaster we created, document the costs, for the next generation? Or will we listen to the folks that say they would repeat these choices, maybe tomorrow?

 
At 7:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

More than five years after the invasion of Iraq -- just in case you were still waiting ..........

http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/print/174947/Tomgram%253A%2520%2520Finally%252C%2520the%2520Oil...

Finally, the Oil...

 
At 8:03 PM, Blogger Chris said...

Since the Rand study revealed the prevalence of Traumatic Brain Injury from proximity to explosions that are among the "invisible war wounds" plagueing returning soldiers who appear to be uninjured we can assume that many civilians are also suffering from this affliction.
The despair in Gaza is exacerbated by constant attacks and the use of sonic booms as a weapon of collective terrorization. No doubt the residents of Sderot are suffering from the trauma of being on the front lines of the conflict as well.
I hope that ceasefire holds.

 
At 8:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Haditha victims' kin outraged as USA Marines face no penalty for massacre of innocent civilians

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/41817.html

 
At 9:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

My only attempt at a blog on a respectable site concerned this very topic. You (unlike me) have ably hammered the MSM and it's veritable sanitization of the airwaves and print. In the Viet Nam era, it was tough to blink away the war because we SAW it everywhere, among other things. I doubt there was an evening when it wasn't SHOWN.
Let's SEE what's going on.
Those of us who cry about it already won't be any more agitated and Joe Blow needs the man behind the curtain to step on out.

 
At 9:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not to get lost in numbers, but I see that the second survey says 31% of those were attributed to the Coalition, 24% to others, 46% unknown. The causes of violent deaths were gunshot (56%), car bomb (13%), other explosion/ordnance (14%), air strike (13%), accident (2%), unknown (2%). As of 2006.

Given that 46% of deaths are unknown, wouldn't that increase the maximum range of US deaths to 77% (although unlikely, it does mean that the maximum range of US deaths is higher than 31%)? I think it should be emphasized that the 310,000 figure is an extrapolation based on the assumption that the causes of violence did not change at all between the surveys. Since the 31% claim is from 2006, whereas the over a million deaths claim is from 2003-March 2007? I would also be curious what category "special contractor" falls into? Are they US forces?

 
At 2:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/business/media/23logan.html?hp&pagewanted=print

June 23, 2008

Reporters Say Networks Put Wars on Back Burner
By BRIAN STELTER

Getting a story on the evening news isn't easy for any correspondent. And for reporters in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is especially hard, according to Lara Logan, the chief foreign correspondent for CBS News. So she has devised a solution when she is talking to the network.

"Generally what I say is, 'I'm holding the armor-piercing R.P.G.,' " she said last week in an appearance on "The Daily Show," referring to the initials for rocket-propelled grenade. " 'It's aimed at the bureau chief, and if you don't put my story on the air, I'm going to pull the trigger.' "

Ms. Logan let a sly just-kidding smile sneak through as she spoke, but her point was serious. Five years into the war in Iraq and nearly seven years into the war in Afghanistan, getting news of the conflicts onto television is harder than ever.

"If I were to watch the news that you hear here in the United States, I would just blow my brains out because it would drive me nuts," Ms. Logan said.

According to data compiled by Andrew Tyndall, a television consultant who monitors the three network evening newscasts, coverage of Iraq has been "massively scaled back this year." Almost halfway into 2008, the three newscasts have shown 181 weekday minutes of Iraq coverage, compared with 1,157 minutes for all of 2007. The "CBS Evening News" has devoted the fewest minutes to Iraq, 51, versus 55 minutes on ABC's "World News" and 74 minutes on "NBC Nightly News." (The average evening newscast is 22 minutes long.)

CBS News no longer stations a single full-time correspondent in Iraq, where some 150,000 United States troops are deployed.

Paul Friedman, a senior vice president at CBS News, said the news division does not get reports from Iraq on television "with enough frequency to justify keeping a very, very large bureau in Baghdad." He said CBS correspondents can "get in there very quickly when a story merits it." ...

 
At 2:54 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's important to remember that the vast majority of Americans disapprove of what the President is doing in Iraq. They were lied into this war, and the more they find out about what is happening there, the more they want to bring the troops home.

 
At 9:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear, Mr. Cole.

Today i have posted this excelent article of yours in First place in the reddit.com newssite. I am proud to help you spread your truth. This is the title i chose that brought so many attention: "The Real State of Iraq: American television is little interested in the massive disaster inflicted upon Iraq by Washington. If You Are, Read this."

http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/

User: DougBolivar

Douglas Maioli

 
At 9:35 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is terrible, as any loss of humane life is but...
Since Americans are not interested in loss of life anywhere on the planet except in their own backyard I can say just one thing:
Some day all these people who did it in Iraq: killers, torturers, organizers etc. will come back home to USA. Do you think they'll have respect form your life and liberty after this?

 
At 10:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is a number that could potentially, be the largest of all.

If my family members or friends had been "unfairly" killed, you can bet me and my brothers and friends would be plotting revenge.
Meaning, the seeds of misdeeds would bear exponential fruit.

 
At 11:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What I find really interesting is that everyone here seems to want to blame the US military, but it's not the US military that is blowing up cars, putting mines in roads, etc. Where's the outrage against the other side?

Hypocrits, all of you!

 
At 11:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for the rundown and critique of MSM performance. It has been abysmal- in the corporate media of course, but also at many so-called "alternative" sites.

It is very difficult to get credible info from the ground. Even outlets like IPS have been running weekly "updates" for years bylined out of Baghdad, Baquba, Fallujah etc. by a 'reporter' named Dahr Jamail. But when confronted, Jamail admitted he has not stepped foot inside Iraq in OVER THREE YEARS!

This is outrageous for those of us who really do report/visit Iraq and other war zones IN PERSON. Not to mention the disrespect for the readers and most of all the suffering Iraqi journalists.

Why is there no demand for journalistic integrity on the Left? If an MSM reporter did this, that reporter would be shunned. Is the alternative press less accountable?

 
At 11:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why are reporters like IPS's Dahr Jamail weekly bylining themselves out of Iraqi cities (for years now) when he has not been to Iraq(by his own admission) in OVER THREE YEARS? Why is this tolerated? Small wonder the world dismisses the alternative press.

It is a sad day when the 'moral' peaceniks are no more honest than the warmongers!

 
At 11:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Neocons, the complicit USA media, and their career driven idiotic puppet--Bush, should be tried for these crimes, just like the Nazi were tried in the Nuremberg Trials.

 
At 11:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like your writing mostly, but I don't think your analogous statistics by means of percentage-wise comparison are helpful. In fact they are misleading and only serve to weaken your argument. What seems to happen is that you trivialize the truth through exaggeration. Can the numbers not speak for themselves?

Your use of the word "real" in the title further damages your argument. We live in an age of hyper-reality. Ideas are mediated and controlled and the truth is a twisted complex of layers and multiplicative perspectives.

As for the comments, I can't believe that people are bickering about the values of the casualty estimates. Sure it is useful to have precise estimates of casualties in war, both civilian and military, Iraqi, coalition.

Credibility or precision are not the problems here. The president has no credibility. The congress has little, the mainstream media has not much to speak of either. Blogs and those writing them never had any credibility in the first place and will problem not have much in the future. The statistics are what they are, part science and part political rhetoric.

The problem as I see it right now is fighting a war whose costs and casualties are often hidden from the people supplying lives, labor, and material resources. Even when those costs and casualties are exposed there is a kind of general sense of powerlessness and apathy that prevents most people from doing much more than frowning about it after they read a blog or hear something on the news.

 
At 12:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

+ +++++++THANK YOU JUAN COLE+++++ + The GREATEST crime of the NEW Millenium needs to be EXPOSED.......As the NO BID OIL contracts arrive, perhaps its time to look at the genesis of this CRIME... 911 (Oh I forgot, bush says we shouldn't think it was a conspiracy) and how it follows a similar situation in HISTORY, The Reichtag fire, then the Emabling Act.......911, then the Patriot act.. Invassion of Poland==Invassion of Afghanistan...Thank You Juan!!!!!!!

 
At 12:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the US, revolutions are old hat. The warmongers feel a sense of entitlement to our civilization, and the complainers urging change don't put forth the effort to get it.

So most people are so apathetic by disenfranchisement, it's like 'f this place' I'm going to enjoy my little, insular life. And that's fine I guess.

People are dying, yes. Too bad. I did not make that choice, nor did I vote for who did, nor twice like the majority of thoughtless pepole in america. We can do nothing about it, since we've tried. we are free from all accountability. The blood is on their hands, but the mess is ours (and our children's) to clean up. Thanks a lot.

The rest of you from other countries don't have the influence we have here. You have a little tiny do-nothing country when others need help so shut the f up about our involvement in world affairs! Thanks a lot!

 
At 6:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ptarmigan (or whatever) is right!

Cole's casualty estimates are propaganda and ptarmigan's are...oh wait...he didn't offer any.

I'm sure the Iraqi "government" keeps estimates, right?

How about the Pentagon?

What *are* some reliable sources for such data?

I bet only a few thousand people died. And they were just asking for it hanging out around 9/11 terrorists.

And who cares really. Iraq is a totally awesome democratic paradise and me and ptarmigan can't wait for another fun, good time war of democracy and liberation!

Bombs away! Go USA!

 
At 8:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i cannot agree more with you , very wrong politics made america
looks very bad around the world

 
At 11:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

We claim to be fighting a war against "terror" yet by killing and displacing millions of innocent we are merely creating "terrorists" daily. In other words, if you weren't an anti-American/freedom fighter in Muslim, you are now. Heck, I can only put myself in their shoes, if someone killed my entire family and ruined my society, I would damn well be "terrorist" or freedom fighter. We, unfortunately, are creating lifelong enemies.

 
At 1:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you Juan Cole. Keep in mind that up to 50% of Americans may still believe Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11. If these numbers hold true (since we're talking about numbers) than up to half of the responses you get here may be by idiots. Ptarmigan, et al, what number of innocent deaths are acceptable in an illegal occupation of a sovereign nation? Are you pretty happy with the U. S. government, right now? Are you looking for truth, or an alibi for sitting on your hands while war crimes go on in your name? Please get out of the way while someone tries to do something productive. Do you see yourself as helping the cause for truth? Funny place to start. I can think of better ways to spend money than oppressing other people. Unfortunately, it seems my fellow Americans can't see gray, black or white. They just don't see at all.

 
At 11:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It all reminds me of the fall of the Roman Empire. Bush playing chess with Cheney as America and other parts of the world he has invaded burn to the ground.
If he doesn't go down in history as the worst and most murderous world leader in the history of the world I will be very surprised, unfortunately, it will all be reported as usual, long after the fact, thanks to a corrupt US media.

 
At 12:56 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

America may profit from the oil in Iraq, but we have lost our most prized posession --- our soul. A country without a soul is a country without light, without a vison, and without hope. How did WE let this happen and why do we allow it to continue?

 
At 7:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the U.S. pulled all of the troops out by October 1, would the killing and bombing stop? Or would it increase?

Do you have that much faith in the Sunnis, Shias, and Kurds to get along? They have a common enemy in the U.S. right now and they still can't stop fighting each other.

What do you suggest be done now that we are already there, and have been there for five years?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home