Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, February 18, 2008

Sadrist/ Badr Truce Breaks Down;
Parliament Rejects Smaller Cabinet

It is awfully suspicious that as soon as a firm date was set for new provincial elections in Iraq (October 1), the truce broke down between the paramilitary of Muqtada al-Sadr and that of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim. This according to Nassar al-Rubaie, the leader of the Sadrist bloc in parliament. The Sadrists say that the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), led by al-Hakim, was supposed to form joint councils in the provinces to resolve disputes, but never did. A lot of the fighting in the south, as at Karbala last fall or at Diwaniyah is actually between Mahdi Army militiamen and Iraqi police recruited from the Badr Corps paramilitary of ISCI.

There is a good chance of the Sadrists taking much of the south in the provincial elections if they are fair, and Muqtada may not want to be bound by agreements with a party that he will seek to toss out of office. ISCI now has Diyala, Baghdad, Hilla, Qadisiyah (Diwaniyah), Najaf, Karbala, Dhi Qar, and Muthanna. Maysan with its capital at Amara is controlled by the Sadrists. The southern oil province of Basra is controlled by the Islamic Virtue Party, an offshoot of the Sadr Movement that rejects Muqtada in favor of Ayatollah Muhammad Ya`qubi.

Al-Zaman reports in Arabic that Hadi al-Amiri, the leader of the Badr Corps, affirms that the truce with the Mahdi Army still stands from his point of view. He told al-Zaman, "Those who have the right to announce a collapse of the agreement are al-Hakim and Muqtada al-Sadr, in their capacities as the signers of it." He said that the agreement was signed by two leaders, not by two parties and that therefore al-Rubaie (as a parliamentarian) has no say in it. He concluded, "The problem of the Sadrists is with the law, not with the Supreme Council." He said that the Sadrists are protesting arrests made of Mahdi Army commanders in Karbala and Diwaniyah, but that these were ordered by the Prime Minister, Nuri al-Maliki, for the purpose of restoring security and establishing a rule of law for all. Both the provinces of Karbala and Diwaniyah are ruled by the Supreme Council, so al-Amiri seems to be eager to exonerate them of charges they have moved against the Sadrists. Instead, he said the arrests were ordered by al-Maliki, the head of the Islamic Call (al-Da`wa) Party.

For his part, al-Rubaie said that he was just stating the obvious, which was that the Badr-Sadr agreement was simply not active. Al-Amiri complained that al-Rubaie has made such statements before, only to have to back off them fairly quickly.

Meanwhile, al-Zaman reports in Arabic that a plan by Nuri al-Maliki to give some key ministries to technocrats and to cut his cabinet down to 22 ministers has foundered. Parties who actually won elections and sit in parliament don't want to give up control of important ministries to unelected technocrats.

Leila Fadel of McClatchy reports that the Kurdistan Regional Authority is placing restrictions on where Arab Iraqis can live in the Kurdish-dominated north.

See recent postings at our collective blog on Global Affairs. One of them is by Gershon Shafir and it looks at the Gaza issue. The other is by Farideh Farhi and deals with the uncertainties of Iran's upcoming elections, and the crackdown on candidates by the hardliners.

At the Napoleon's Egypt blog, a new letter by Gen. Berthier on the siege of Acre.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At 5:51 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Iraqis are playing games with the planned government reshuffle, mainly for a US audience.

Governments cannot function properly without the rule-of-law, the rest is just fiddling. Assume for a second that the new ministers will have amazing competence and patriotism. Who would obey their orders? The current senior managers have militia backing and keep guns in their offices to “settle arguments”, would any real technocrat dare upsetting them?

The Iraqi professionals are either dead or living abroad as refugees. Who will manage and execute the mythical plans and reconstruction? The Green Zone scum recently announced a "plan" to solve the refugees problem: they are sending a senior politician to tell them to return (the Badr death-squads must be running out of potential victims.)

Maliki is responding to the new 3+1 'Executive Council': Iraq's President and his two VPs + Maliki. This is a plot to diminish his authority, but he swiftly sent them a letter saying that he would like a drastically slimmed-down cabinet (22 ministers instead of the current 36) and to be all talented and whiter-than-white technocrats. He actually does not want that, because he relentlessly plants dim members of his Da'wa party at high places, but the 3+1 system will take the blame for rejecting his request.

The new Minister of Agriculture is a good example of what we will end up with. He has some background in the subject, therefore he was touted as a technocrat. But he is a Shiite fundamentalist with very strong ties to Iran, which is why he was given the job. He announced on his first day in office a ten-year plan for self-sufficiency in all crops and animals. No mention of how he will force the Iraqi farmers or give them incentives for farming what is not best suited for them, or WHY? After spending a little more time he came up with an more brilliant idea: he will take water to the Iraqi deserts to grow date-palms for their fruit there. Now, it takes ten years to the first harvest of dates, and the extremely fertile Iraqi irrigated farmland is dying from salinity and water mismanagement for the first time in 5 thousand years: wouldn't it be better ....!

 
At 9:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Be interesting to have your comment on The door to Iraq's oil opens wide Juan Cole.

The way I read it the author is saying the Iraq war's been "won" by the international Oil patch. That the technocrats are going to deliver Iraq's oil into the hands of the oil patch very soon, without consultation with the parliament or with anyone else.

 
At 11:57 AM, Blogger MonsieurGonzo said...

Azzaman : “U.S. troops erect walls in Mosul as inhabitants flee” :

U.S. and Iraqi troops are carrying out military operations in heavily populated areas of the northern city of Mosul to flush out insurgents.

And in their bid they are separating and isolating residential quarters with security barriers and walls making movement rather difficult.

Some quarters like Yarmouk, Thawar and Siha are completed isolated.

The city, Iraq’s second largest with nearly three million people, has turned into a major stronghold for the Iraqi branch of Qaeda and anti-U.S. rebels.

But provincial officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, say the Qaeda and other groups opposing U.S. occupation have either fled or merged with the population.

With no guarantees given that the [American, et al] troops would not repeat the mistake committed in other rebel cities in the subjugation of which the U.S. employed warplanes and heavy artillery, tens of thousands of residents are fleeing to safer areas.”

The grotesque model of the ghetto as ersatz Green Zone now appears to be an established tactic and "transferrable" feature of Occupation policy. As historians we can now clearly see that the most concrete and enduring legacy of ‘The American Occupation of IRAQ, 2003- ’, will be walls.

ignorant of history even as they wander through it, American commanders fail to see that what ever is carved or cast in stone in the Middle East, even when time worn to rubble, tends to persist in perpetuity :-/

 
At 12:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Iraq oil law stalled, no end to impasse in sight

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/18/AR2008021800716.html

A law that could shape Iraq's future by clearing the way for investment in its oil fields is deadlocked by a battle for control of the reserves and no end to the impasse is in sight.

The bill is also meant to share revenue equitably from the world's third largest oil reserves, thus helping bridge the deep divides between Iraq's Shi'ites, Sunni Arabs and Kurds.

The one thing all sides agree on is the law is vital to securing foreign investment to boost Iraq's oil output and rebuild its shattered economy after five years of insurgency and sectarian fighting that has killed tens of thousands of people.

But the law remains stalled by bitter rows between Baghdad and the largely autonomous Kurdistan region in the north over who will control the fields and how revenue will be shared.

Iraq, currently producing some 2.3 million barrels per day, is seeking major investment to tap its reserves and boost output. It holds 115 billion barrels of proven crude oil reserves, surpassed only by Saudi Arabia and Iran.

US officials say the main reason foreign oil majors have avoided Iraq is the lack of the law, not security concerns.

In the absence of the law, Baghdad has opened the door to foreign oil firms by offering a role in servicing existing oil infrastructure. Over 70 companies met the deadline on Monday for submitting documents to qualify to compete in service contract tenders.

 
At 6:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The one thing all sides agree on is the law is vital to securing foreign investment to boost Iraq's oil output and rebuild its shattered economy after five years of insurgency and sectarian fighting that has killed tens of thousands of people.

You must work for ExxonMobil, Anonymous. There's plenty of oil found already in Iraq and the Iraqi oil sector is perfectly capable of developing its own resources. The only thing "foreign investment" does is justify the rape of the Iraqi oil fields.

In the absence of the law, Baghdad has opened the door to foreign oil firms by offering a role in servicing existing oil infrastructure. Over 70 companies met the deadline on Monday for submitting documents to qualify to compete in service contract tenders.

Which is what I was asking Juan about above. Please see the link at Asia Times Online and comment.

As far as the "walls and barriers" go... have you forgotten who's running this show? Same folks who've been running the West Bank and Gaza for the last forty years. Iraq is merely the US' "occupied territories", and McCain, Obama, and Clinton are all A-OK with that. McCain's good for a hundred years.

America and all of us Americans have slipped right down the slippery slope into War Criminal status.

And no one seems to care.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home