Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Top Ten Myths about Iraq 2007



10. Myth: The US public no longer sees Iraq as a central issue in the 2008 presidential campaign.


In a recent ABC News/ Washington Post poll, Iraq and the economy were virtually tied among voters nationally, with nearly a quarter of voters in each case saying it was their number one issue. The economy had become more important to them than in previous months (in November only 14% said it was their most pressing concern), but Iraq still rivals it as an issue!


9. Myth: There have been steps toward religious and political reconciliation in Iraq in 2007. Fact: The government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has for the moment lost the support of the Sunni Arabs in parliament. The Sunnis in his cabinet have resigned. Even some Shiite parties have abandoned the government. Sunni Arabs, who are aware that under his government Sunnis have largely been ethnically cleansed from Baghdad, see al-Maliki as a sectarian politician uninterested in the welfare of Sunnis.

8. Myth: The US troop surge stopped the civil war that had been raging between Sunni Arabs and Shiites in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad.

Fact: The civil war in Baghdad escalated during the US troop escalation. Between January, 2007, and July, 2007, Baghdad went from 65% Shiite to 75% Shiite. UN polling among Iraqi refugees in Syria suggests that 78% are from Baghdad and that nearly a million refugees relocated to Syria from Iraq in 2007 alone. This data suggests that over 700,000 residents of Baghdad have fled this city of 6 million during the US 'surge,' or more than 10 percent of the capital's population. Among the primary effects of the 'surge' has been to turn Baghdad into an overwhelmingly Shiite city and to displace hundreds of thousands of Iraqis from the capital.


7. Myth: Iran was supplying explosively formed projectiles (a deadly form of roadside bomb) to Salafi Jihadi (radical Sunni) guerrilla groups in Iraq. Fact: Iran has not been proved to have sent weapons to any Iraqi guerrillas at all. It certainly would not send weapons to those who have a raging hostility toward Shiites. (Iran may have supplied war materiel to its client, the Supreme Islamic Council of Iraq (ISCI), which was then sold off from warehouses because of graft, going on the arms market and being bought by guerrillas and militiamen.

6. Myth: The US overthrow of the Baath regime and military occupation of Iraq has helped liberate Iraqi women. Fact: Iraqi women have suffered significant reversals of status, ability to circulate freely, and economic situation under the Bush administration.

5. Myth: Some progress has been made by the Iraqi government in meeting the "benchmarks" worked out with the Bush administration. Fact: in the words of Democratic Senator Carl Levin, "Those legislative benchmarks include approving a hydrocarbon law, approving a debaathification law, completing the work of a constitutional review committee, and holding provincial elections. Those commitments, made 1 1/2 years ago, which were to have been completed by January of 2007, have not yet been kept by the Iraqi political leaders despite the breathing space the surge has provided."

4. Myth: The Sunni Arab "Awakening Councils," who are on the US payroll, are reconciling with the Shiite government of PM Nuri al-Maliki even as they take on al-Qaeda remnants. Fact: In interviews with the Western press, Awakening Council tribesmen often speak of attacking the Shiites after they have polished off al-Qaeda. A major pollster working in Iraq observed,
' Most of the recent survey results he has seen about political reconciliation, Warshaw said, are "more about [Iraqis] reconciling with the United States within their own particular territory, like in Anbar. . . . But it doesn't say anything about how Sunni groups feel about Shiite groups in Baghdad." Warshaw added: "In Iraq, I just don't hear statements that come from any of the Sunni, Shiite or Kurdish groups that say 'We recognize that we need to share power with the others, that we can't truly dominate.' " ' '
The polling shows that "the Iraqi government has still made no significant progress toward its fundamental goal of national reconciliation."

3. Myth: The Iraqi north is relatively quiet and a site of economic growth. Fact: The subterranean battle among Kurds, Turkmen and Arabs for control of the oil-rich Kirkuk province makes the Iraqi north a political mine field. Kurdistan now also hosts the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) guerrillas that sneak over the border and kill Turkish troops. The north is so unstable that the Iraqi north is now undergoing regular bombing raids from Turkey.

2. Myth: Iraq has been "calm" in fall of 2007 and the Iraqi public, despite some grumbling, is not eager for the US to depart. Fact: in the past 6 weeks, there have been an average of 600 attacks a month, or 20 a day, which has held steady since the beginning of November. About 600 civilians are being killed in direct political violence per month, but that number excludes deaths of soldiers and police. Across the board, Iraqis believe that their conflicts are mainly caused by the US military presence and they are eager for it to end.

1. Myth: The reduction in violence in Iraq is mostly because of the escalation in the number of US troops, or "surge."

Fact: Although violence has been reduced in Iraq, much of the reduction did not take place because of US troop activity. Guerrilla attacks in al-Anbar Province were reduced from 400 a week to 100 a week between July, 2006 and July, 2007. But there was no significant US troop escalation in al-Anbar. Likewise, attacks on British troops in Basra have declined precipitously since they were moved out to the airport away from population centers. But this change had nothing to do with US troops.

Labels:

27 Comments:

At 9:13 AM, Blogger Linda Magid said...

I appreciate this information. How do we disseminate it to the mainstream? I am frustrated when I hear "The Surge is Working!" This Surge Victory mentality is very short sighted. Even if it did contribute to fewer violent attacks, if the Iraqi government isn't taking strong action to act like a government, it makes no difference. Senator McCain is riding on the "See? I was right about the Surge" platform and given the vacuum happening right now in the Republican Primary, he could really ride that inaccurate wave. Just what we need - to be duped again into voting in a Hawk who rewrites the facts to gain popularity. Grrrr.

 
At 10:02 AM, Blogger Gene Ha said...

Unfortunately, the biggest myth about Iraq is still "Iraq attacked us on 9/11."

http://helpychalk.blogspot.com/2007/12/if-only-we-had-forgiven-iraq-for-911.html

 
At 10:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The question I continue to ask is, has the violence really diminished, or has the REPORTED violence been diminished? Reportage has NEVER been good in Iraq, for reasons beyond the control of reporters (legal and etra-legal), and the sort of mafia-like control going on in militia-dominated areas is likely to be very violent, whatever nominal authority the US has in those areas.

 
At 10:28 AM, Blogger Todd said...

Willing Suspension of Disbelief indeed.

 
At 10:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Juan, thanks for this valuable article. Just as an aside, I think "falsehood" would have been a better choice than "myth".
d.

 
At 11:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The statement that "[e]ven some Shiite parties have abandoned the government" makes it harder to use the fact that "[t]he government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has for the moment lost the support of the Sunni Arabs in parliament. The Sunnis in his cabinet have resigned" as an argument against any myth that "[t]here have been steps toward religious and political reconciliation in Iraq in 2007." Rather, the facts regarding both Shiites and Sunni Arabs suggest that Maliki's government is simply broadly unpopular.

 
At 2:08 PM, Blogger LFC said...

It looks like allowing several years of uncontrolled ethnic cleansing to occur in Baghdad is finally bringing about a "peace dividend".

To see how things have changed in a year, check out this link showing the before and after maps Gen. Patraeus didn't want us to see.

 
At 2:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"...if the Iraqi government isn't taking strong action to act like a government..."

Without - believe me! - intending any defense of the so-called "Iraqi government", let's please put the onus where it belongs. The Iraqi "government" could not act like a government even if it were inclined to do so. Maliki and his cabinet are set up and expected to act as puppets to the occupying power, and have caught on well to that task, even when it includes violating the Iraqi Constitution.

The Parliament - the only body that can to any reasonable degree be considered even sort of elected - is rather less cooperative than Maliki and his cabinet. That was not a problem, however, because on command from his American masters, Maliki has simply bypassed the Parliament.

It is not realistic to expect any "government" operating under occupation and at the behest of the occupiers to function as a real government.

 
At 2:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"the facts regarding both Shiites and Sunni Arabs suggest that Maliki's government is simply broadly unpopular."

One of the most important struggles - many would say THE most important one - is also one of the least reported (and perhaps the least noticed?). That would be the struggle between nationalists and separatists, or perhaps more accurately, between those who see their future tied to either the American neo-imperial presence in Iraq or the Iranian regime, or, at least for the moment, both.

 
At 3:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the American system, it is the job of politicians and supporting media to spin the news. Unless the system is changed, complaints like these just add to the pleasure they get from achieving results.

The stong nationalism helps them too: "so you don't want victory for America?". Nationalism is seen as a problem, not a virtue, in other advanced societies. Pride is fine, but sprortingly not as the American either-us-or-them.

 
At 5:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is sad that Juan has to delineate the top 10 Iraqi myths. Sad, indeed, that the media and the Bush loyalists can't get beyond the "We must win, we must win" attitude.

The truth is that we have already lost. Yes, Bushies . . . you Lost! Get used to hearing it and get over it.

The war was a losing proposition from the beginning as many of us knew from the get-go (so I don't feel like I lost personally - just as a country with a bunch of idiots in power). Why should or would we listen to Bush loyalists especially now?

Go read the Constitution for homework.

 
At 2:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

These are very important points chock full of data. It would be great to post citations for all the numbers. thx.

 
At 9:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, Virginia, the violence has really diminished. Here's an example of a transformed neighborhood.

But no, the violence didn't diminish solely because we added brigades. We also drastically changed our approach as Petraeus put his new tactics into effect. Those changes have been far more important than the raw numbers. He move our forces out of their mega-bases, colocating them with Iraqi forces, and pulled way back on kinetics in favor of working directly with tribal leaders.

Lots more but I'll stop with one item. The notoriously dysfunctional Shia-dominated parliament just passed a law that formalized pensions for retired Sunni government workers. Things are still a mess there, but Cole's tendentious accounting shames him.

 
At 7:22 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

i see many yanks bleating but i never see real action. sod off with the typing and do something concrete.

let's face it, you yanks caused this mess. it's about time you grew some cohones and owned up to it and faced the music.

all the rest of the world sees is an old chinese maxim... saving face. "oops we screwed up and don't want to face the moral implications of such a monumental f**k up."
the us govt sentenced a japanese officer to 15 yrs hard labour during the "WAR CRIMES" tribunal of ww2 for waterboarding us prisoners and they called it torture.
now it's an enhanced in'terror'gation technique.

come to think of it... bear stearns had a hedge fund called the "high grade structured credit "ENHANCED" leverage fund". wow. and guess what, that fund is empty. yep totally empty, just like their "high grade structured credit strategies fund". around 3 billions worth from last count.
as empty as the morality of the us goverment and its populace.


like i said before, sod off with the typing and do something concrete.

also get the heck out of everyone elses countries because your own is a bloody mess.
especially its so called democracy, now that's a joke of monumental proportions.

 
At 3:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I appreciate the information, but I am curious...How many of you posters have actually BEEN to Iraq? I am a soldier currently stationed in Iraq and can tell you that things ARE getting better.

Granted, we shouldn't be here in the first place, but we are and we have to clean up the mess we made. With that being said, maybe if we got a little more suppoert and a little less bitching, it sure could help the cause.

SGT G

 
At 10:19 AM, Blogger MDB said...

SGT G, you can be informed withouth having been there, but I spent 14 months in Ramadi and I am getting ready to go on my second tour after a 9 month break.
Things are getting better as SGT G says but it's only because the deSunnification of Baghdad is working...not the "surge". Just like with the Palestinians and Jews I wish one side would obliterate the other so we could go home.
CPT M

 
At 10:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sgt. G:

(If you really are who you say you are) I'll take your words at face value. But at least thanks for acknowledging that the U.S. never should have gone to Iraq in the first place. And to wendler: A blog named after the treasonous scumbag Karl Rove? Please. Who are you kidding?

 
At 3:16 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Great article. Would that we could see more like it in mainstream media. Just a footnote: I suspect that there will be a huge surge in hostilities starting at least six months before the November elections and esculating in October and throughout November.

 
At 9:12 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

I too would like to see some citation for this, but I'm digging it. The media coverage of Iraq is abysmal.

 
At 5:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I picked this off the CIA Factbook on Iraq:
"Coalition forces remain in Iraq under a UNSC mandate ..."
www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/iz.html

I know of no Security Council mandate; is there one?

Also, with 4 million refugees of a pop. of 27 million, the CIA states the migration rate as "0".

Regards from Orwell in 2008!

 
At 11:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous:
SC/9207

Security Council
5808th Meeting (PM)

Recognizing the request from Iraq, the Security Council today decided to extend the mandate of the multinational force in that country -- "for the last time", according to its Permanent Representative -- until 31 December 2008.

 
At 3:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't believe a single candidate that claims they will withdraw troops from Iraq when Bush will be gone.

 
At 1:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have no opinion on the subject but it is interesting how liberals refuse to acknowledge successes in Iraq. Like the Sergent said, we shouldn't be over there in the first place, but when there is progress, lets celebrate the success and do more to help it instead of bitching about how reductions in violence aren't really reductions in violence.

Anyway, its so trivial and pointless to argue about this sort of thing because no matter how much one tries, they will never see eye-to-eye with the other side. So, just stop reading Blog comments and go outside and exercise or hang out with your girlfriend or do something otherwise productive.

 
At 10:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are all just a bunch of people led by the media. The troops only know half of what's going on and aren't allowed to tell the media what they know. The media is frustrated because no one will tell them anything, so they print what sells (like always) As an Iraqi Freedom Vet myself, I find your website offensive and will do everything in my power to keep you from messing up this world just because you saw something on CNN and took it as the truth. Wake up. Please.

 
At 1:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

it is interesting to see this understinding of the US role in the ethnic cleansing in iraq. the fallout of this occupation is going to last for generations to come. and as far as history is concerned the US HAS changed the demography, geography, history, economy and polity of the region.

what would be interesting to see now would be the face of Mousul. apprently that is next in line after baghdad for US attention.

 
At 2:59 PM, Blogger John Rohan said...

As a vet myself, I have a few problems with this list of "myths". Many of them are true, but interestingly, you are cherry picking myths that cast the administration in the worst light possible.

And I take issue with two points: 1) I don't recall anyone claiming that Iran was arming Sunnis, so AFAIK that point is a straw man. And both the US and the UK have intercepted weapons smuggled from Iran, so you are absolutely wrong on that point.

For my own list of 11 myths you can look here here, although I wrote it about a year prior to this so it doesn't address the surge.

 
At 1:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for the share!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home