Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Thursday, November 29, 2007

13 Wounded, including 7 US Troops, in Baquba Bombing
Biden says Surge Success 'a Fantasy'
Da'wa splits, Some eye Jaafari as Leader

7 US troops were wounded along with 5 Iraqi civilians when a female suicide bomber detonated her payload in Baquba. The attack took place on Tuesday but was not announced until Wednesday.

Senator Joe Biden says that the idea that the US troop escalation or 'surge' is "working" in Iraq is a "fantasy" because there is no evidence that it has produced political progress or reconciliation.

A lot of the reduction in violence has been produced by artificial measures like forbidding vehicular traffic in certain areas or building big blast walls around neighborhoods, isolating them and destroying their retailers. These steps are good insofar as they prevent attacks. But they would only really be successful in the medium to long term if they contributed to a political settlement. The problem is that such measures are not sustainable. You got the big bombing in the pet market last Friday because the US military started letting people drive there again, creating an opening for a car bomber. So reducing violence is praiseworthy, however it is done. But if people are going to talk about "success," they have to show a sort of political progress such that when the cars start circulating again or the blast walls come down, you don't revert to civil war. The "surge" troops are already beginning to come home. Will the violence just return in their wake?

Biden is asking the right question. Even Republicans like Lindsay Graham and Saxby Chambliss seem to agree with his premise. But their apparent confidence that they can just change the Iraqi government at will is probably misplaced. Or at least there is no guarantee they will get something better if they do.

The Americans already helped unseat the elected prime minister, Ibrahim Jaafari. Speaking of whom, Al-Sharq al-Awsat reports in Arabic that various splinter groups of the Da'wa Party and offshoots of the Supreme Islamic Council of Iraq, unhappy that Jaafari was unseated, are attempting to convince him to act as their leader and to challenge al-Maliki as prime minister. Under the Iraqi constitution, 55 members of parliament can call a vote of no confidence against the prime minister. Al-Maliki is certainly vulnerable to such a maneuver.

The US has bribed 6,000 tribesmen to help guard the northern city of Hawija from Salafi Jihadi infiltration into northern Iraq. If I read the report correctly, they are receiving $275 a month for patrolling. That would be $1,650,000 a month or $19,800,000 a year for Hawija. Since the US was spending several billion dollars a month to keep tens of thousands of US soldiers in Iraq to do the same thing, it sounds like a bargain to me.

Labels:

7 Comments:

At 9:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

When the pro-war Americans talk of winning it, do they mean declaring victory and leaving, or do they think that they can then stay in Iraq in peace having broken the Iraqis? The difference between the two is night and day.

This is a genuine question.

 
At 2:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

RE: "...The ceremony to pledge the 6,000 new fighters was presided over by a dozen sheiks — each draped in black robes trimmed with gold braiding — who signed the contract on behalf of tribesmen at a small U.S. outpost in north-central Iraq."

In addition to the $275 monthly for each tribesman, you can bet the dozen sheiks in back robes are also becoming multi-milionaires for their roles in this. Basically, he US is developing client warlords not necessarily loyal to the US or the Iraqi central government. This will work as long as the money flows.

 
At 3:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"it sounds like a bargain to me" - it is a bargain, while it lasts. It would have been an even better bargain, and probably sustainable, if they had just started paying the Iraqi army right from the start.

As to anonymous above - the pro-war crowd claim they are winning when violence goes up, claim they are winning when violence goes down, and I suppose would claim they are winning when violence stays the same.

They declare victory over and over, and they NEVER INTEND TO LEAVE since the real "victory" is control of the energy resources in the area. And, on that criteria, the war and occupation is still a draw. They are not able to exploit the oil, but neither is anyone else, least of all the Iraqis.
- dancewater

 
At 3:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

McCain's lame 'bomb iran' joke is not as disturbing as the broad Democratic acceptance of the premise that it could be in our national interest and legal mandate to 'keep it on the table'.

Where in our 'no other powers' foundation contract does it say that the executive has the legal right to wage wars of choice, using paper money secured by debt, bonds issued to foreign powers (China being the largest) that will make debt-slaves of our grandchildren? That the executive can raise private armies whose officers and men can be headquartered and recruited abroad, to serve at executive descretion outside the laws of the United States?

What in God's name has happened to the notion of Constitutional due process, a People's House that is watchful over an executive of sharply limited power?

We don't have 'activist judges' finding that the founders intended these new amazing Presidential super-powers. We have a confused WH ex cathedra WH declaration of a 'unitary executive' doctrine, and an ongoing demonstration they can ignore, make, or break laws at will.

Where are these famous checks and balances? Is this what 12 semesters of public school civics and history has conditioned our voters and our leaders to accept?

 
At 7:32 PM, Blogger Ajaz Haque said...

The whole debate was a yawn. I think this format is no good when candidates are trying to be holier than thou. Isn't the idea of a debate for the candidates to speak their minds - not in this format. Everyoone is trying to cover his behind.

McCain looked pathetic comparing anti-war sentiment to pro hitler sentiment. He is a respectable man and should get out of the race to stay that way.

 
At 9:48 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Been a year since the Iraq Study Group issued its report and slightly less than that since the Bush administration rejected their recommendations - Or did they?

The surge. The Annapolis conference. The efforts to reach out to Iran and at Annapolis to Syria. The massive program of employing Sunni insurgents. The Mahdi army stand down.

Could it be that the Bush Administration in its own way, in its own time and without saying so is actually trying to implement the ISG recommendations?

 
At 4:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you, Dr. Cole,
for yet another accidental endorsement of the "Model Communities" approach:

"The US has bribed 6,000 tribesmen ... they are receiving $275 a month for patrolling. ... it sounds like a bargain to me."

................

And 2 Anonymous posters above are on the cusp of a breakthrough.

Trying to be cute,
they imply that disaster must follow when the US money runs out.

But US money can be replaced with Iraqi oil revenue,
if this "Model Communities" stuff incentivizes the warlords of discrete fiefdoms
to each protect those portions of oil infrastructure within their zones of control.

For so long,
folks wanted to deny the reality that the only cadre of Iraqi leaders that could stabilize and secure the country
were the authentic indigenous local leaders of neighborhoods and villages.

Now tiring of the top-down approaches that could never succeed,
many are willing to try the only approach that ever had a chance of working.

It's encouraging.

If key advisors at State and DoD would just present the bad news to their respective Secretaries,
that staying the course will not get us any closer to our objectives,

and that "Model Communities" will,
then President Bush could loudly claim his "Return on Success"
and get us out of there.
.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home