Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Basra and a Mahdi Army Resurgence?

AP reports that Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani is concerned about a wave of assassinations and killings in the southern port city of Basra:


' A spokesman for Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq's top Shiite cleric, called on the Iraqi government to stop violence he said was increasingly plaguing southern Iraq and warned the inaction could further alienate Iraqis from the political process.

Sheik Abdul-Mahdi al-Karbalai said 200 people were killed in the past three months in the city of Basra alone, in addition to kidnappings, and he accused the government of failing to hold the attackers accountable or to stop oil smuggling operations.

Al-Karbalai's figures could not be independently verified, but his complaint was a sign of growing frustration over rampant clashes and violence in the mainly Shiite south largely blamed on rival militia factions.'


Aljazeera reported this week that the Mahdi Army of Muqtada al-Sadr had routed the Basra police force and taken over the center of the city. These allegations are exaggerated, but it is possible that the Mahdi Army is growing in power in this key southern port through which most of Iraq's oil exports flow. The report said:

' The militia took over the city in clashes with the Iraqi police and reports say that the fighting was still going on. According to Al Jazeera, during the clashes, the local police chief, Muhammad Qaji, was forced to flee the city and the militants took control of the city's main power centres and deployed their men along Basra's main streets. Currently, at least four people are dead - three Iraqi soldiers and a militant - and at least 10 are injured. The men of the Mahdi army have also reportedly captured 50 police officers. The most violent clashes were in the city's central district of al-Andalus district. '


In contrast, AFP reported the police side of the story, in which there was a little trouble but they had it under control. (Though the police case that the skirmishes were minor is undermined by their apparent need to exaggerate the number of foreign residents they had arrested, by giving the figures from way back last June to present.)

Millenarian Shiites in Basra believe that the US and British forces are creating chaos in Iraq in order to distract Shiites from the Second Coming of their Promised One.

AP also reports that the Mahdi Army is reconsidering its truce with the rival Badr Corps, another major Shiite paramilitary. The Sadrists complain that the truce has yielded no tangible benefit to them.

The Mahdi Army is also considering ending its truce with the US military, having been angered by American raids on the militia's leaders.

---

At the Global Affairs group blog, Farideh Farhi on the significance of Bush's new sanctions on Iran; and Barnett Rubin on Afghanistan.

At the Napoleon's Egypt blog, Gen. Bonaparte issues orders for the organization of Egypt's provinces, appointing provincial governing councils, police chiefs and tax collectors.

Labels:

3 Comments:

At 8:27 AM, Blogger David Wearing said...

The violence in Basra of course makes a mockery of British claims to be 'standing down as Iraqis stand up' to the security challenges.

The reality is that as Iraqis have stood up against the British and, tragically, against each other, the British have retreated into their remotest base to pray for the day when the master in Washington allows them to leave.

Thus we have the worst of both worlds. The unwanted presence of a foreign army undermining and destabilising the south rather than at least giving the minimal benefit of security (albeit illegitimate security) that such a force claims to try and provide.

Its by neither working as an effective nation-builder in Iraq (not that it ever had the right to) nor simply leaving as the Iraqis want it to, that Britain has helped precipitate the current crisis in the south.

 
At 10:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

“………Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistan is concerned about a wave of assassinations and killings in the southern port city of Basra…….”



Well.. Mr.Cole..Sorry, but it will prove to be a fact that you will be reporting this same news in the year 2807, if you are from planet Nibiru and can live 3600 years like Amen/Marduk is. Don’t expect Iraqi’s to evolve anytime sooner, my hunch feeling is that it is "evolved genetics" and they will never continue the evolutionary path on a different strand. Admittedly racist remark, but real fact that can be proved by going back in Greater Iraq history 11,000 earth years.

 
At 4:11 PM, Blogger Chris said...

Grand Ayatollah al Sistani may be indirectly comparing the situation in Basra to Diyala province where a US military commander said most Shiite's now look to his clerical leadership instead of Muqtada al Sadr. One purpose of the US military's CLC (Concerned Local Citizen) program is to wean Shiite's away from the Sadrist militia, and it's not surprising Muqtada al Sadr strongly opposes that.

Al Sistani also sent a clerical representative to a major tribal awakening in Taji, in Diyala, at the end of August. However most US media and analysts if they even acknowledge the CLC program say it only applies to Sunni's. However the US military commander for Diyala recently said there are now an equal number of Shiite and Sunni tribes under the CLC program, plus one mixed tribe which has historically included both Sunni and Shiite. The CLC leaders co-ordinate with neighboring CLC's, with the US military managing tribal disputes where necessary - which in Diyala is apparently fairly often.

Also related to Diyala the Prime Minister recently approved something like 6,000 additional local police for Diyala, a key objective of the US military there since the first permanent withdrawal of US "surge" forces is to be from Diyala. However apparently the Interior Ministry failed to go along since most new members of the local police would come from the CLC program - one of the major reasons they join is to join the Iraqi security forces.

That caused Army Major General Benjamin Mixon, who until this week commanded MNF-North which includes Diyala, to severely criticize the Interior Ministry for "sectarian divides" and "sectarian decision-making". This was very unusual for the US military, but the transcript it's clear tensions over the Interior and Defense Ministry are boiling over. This was an extract from the transcript of his press conference:
--------------------------------------------------------

GEN. MIXON: ... But the problem we're dealing with now is what appears to be still sectarian divides in the Ministry of Interior that is responsible for the support to the police. There's still a lot of work to be done down there to do away with the sectarian decision-making that occurs in the ministry of interior in Baghdad.

Q Some examples of that? What are the problems that that's causing for you? What's not being done that needs to be done?

GEN. MIXON: Well, the hiring of police, for example, in Diyala -- we've been trying to get an additional 6,000 police hired in Diyala for the last several months. It has been approved by the prime minister, but it appears to us that there's some foot-dragging going on in the ministry of interior that needs to be stopped. We need to hire a balanced force so that we can improve the security situation in Diyala. That's the most glaring example I can point out to you.

Q Very briefly, are those mainly or entirely Sunni police officers that you're looking to hire?


GEN. MIXON: No, we're looking to balance the force in Diyala, so it would be a combination of Sunni, Shi'a, and we do have Kurds that also live in Diyala. So we'd like to achieve a better balance particularly by neighborhood.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home