Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Iraqi Establishment Rejects US Senate Resolution
Al-Maliki: A Disaster for Iraq and the Region

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Friday rejected the US Senate resolution calling for a soft partition of Iraq. Reuters reports:


' "They should stand by Iraq to solidify its unity and its sovereignty," Maliki told Iraqi state television . . ."They shouldn't be proposing its division. That could be a disaster not just for Iraq but for the region." Maliki also called on the Iraqi parliament to meet and respond formally to the non-binding resolution, passed by the Senate on Wednesday, which called for the creation of "a federal system of government and ... federal regions". '


Al-Sharq al-Awsat reports in Arabic that Abdul Mahdi al-Karbala'i, the representative of Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani in the Shiite shrine city of Karbala south of the capital, called the Senate resolution "a step toward the breakup of Iraq." He said Iraqis of all religions and ethnicities should live at peace in a united country. He also called on the Arab states, especially the Arab countries neighboring Iraq, to prevent any such partition. He said, "It is a mistake to imagine that such a plan will lead to a reduction in chaos in Iraq; rather, on the contrary, it will lead to an increase in the butchery and a deepening of the crisis of this country, and the spreading of increased chaos, even to neighboring states."

I don't think Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani likes the Senate plan very much.

The Sunni Association of Muslim Scholars also denounced the plan, but said it came as no surprise, since the break-up of Iraq had been the motive for the US invasion of that country in the first place. The AMS said that the resolution issued from a well-known wing of the present American administration and from the Zionist lobby.

On the other hand, the office of the Kurdistan Regional Government's president, Massoud Barzani, issued a statement welcoming the resolution. It insisted that loose federalism does not equal partition, but rather voluntary unity.

Al-Sharq al-Awsat reports in Arabic that Iraqi Vice President Adil Abdul Mahdi appears to have rethought his initial rejection of the Senate resolution. He said in Cairo that one model for Iraq might be the United Arab Emirates, a loose association of fairly autonomous sheikhdoms. Likewise, Sawt al-Iraq says in Arabic, As'ad Sultan Abu Kalal, the governor of Najaf province, called for the implementation of loose federalism as the best system for Iraq.

The same report says that Sunni cleric Harith al-Dhari accused Prime Minister al-Maliki of having all along plotted to break up Iraq. (That Sunni leaders see him this way may explain al-Maliki's eagerness to distance himself from the US senate.)

The Gulf Cooperation Council, grouping six Persian Gulf oil states, also denounced the resolution, as did the Arab League and Yemen.

Kurdistan authorities denounced an agreement between Baghdad and Ankara to fight terrorism, which targets the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), to whom Iraqi Kurdish authorities have given safe haven.

On how Bush hasn't after all liberated Iraqi women, maybe.

In fact, Sam Dagher of the CMS reports on how Basra has become increasingly Talibanized under the rule of Shiite militias, as the British troops have withdrawn from the city.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is driving the US toward a war against Iran, and authored the draft for the Kyl-Lieberman resolution passed overwhelmingly by the US senate.

Reuters reports civil war violence on Thursday and Friday. Major incidents on Friday:

'MOSUL - A truck bomb wounded 20 people and destroyed an overpass in Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad, police said.

(McClatchy says: "- Around 2 p.m. a truck bomb destroyed a bridge in Al Shifaa area in Mosul. The bombing flattened the bridge and caused several injuries among civilians in the nearby houses especially, Iraqi police said."]

BAGHDAD - A U.S. air raid killed at least eight people in the Al Saha neighbourhood of Doura district in southern Baghdad, police and medical sources said. . .

[McClatchy adds:

Baghdad

- Around 2 a.m. U.S. military used aerial fire targeting a building in Al Doura area south Baghdad, Iraqi police said. The aerial fire targeted building number 139 in Al Siha district. 10 people were killed and 7 others were injured according to the Iraqi police sources. No U.S. military response was available by the time of publication of this report.

- Around 11 a.m. a mortar shell slammed in Al Ubaidi neighborhood. Two people were injured.

- Police found 5 dead bodies throughout Baghdad. . .


The Mosul bombing came on the heels of destructive suicide bombings on Wednesday. Mosul is in Ninevah Province, one of the provinces the US had hoped to withdraw from by now (this sort of insecurity has postponed that move until next summer.)

Some 130 Iraqis were killed or wounded on Thursday and Friday.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At 6:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kurdistan would actually lose out under the Biden proposal. They already enjoy all the privileges of that system, plus they have a big say in the federal system too.

If the other regions get the same independence, Kurdistan can be excluded from the income of the other regions. Right now, nearly 100% of the Kurdistan budget comes from Baghdad.

The supposedly red-hot Kurdish economy does not actually produce. The rest of Iraq pays for all the public buildings, which are built by outsiders, as well as the enormous sums the corrupt officials make, which they buy luxury imports and big mansions with. All of that, as well as the pay for public services would come to a halt.

 
At 7:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So the British leave Basra and the fundamentalists will try to take over the city. Will they succeed?
So the Us leaves Iraq and the fundamentalists will try to take over the key cities. Will they succeed?
I am smart enough to know that I as an average American citizen really has no real understanding pertaining to the complexities of the situation in Iraq.
I do feel real guilt as an American as to what we have done to Iraq.
I think the logic of the soft partioning of Iraq is that when
the US troops leave Iraq many Americans have the fear of the unknown consequences. A partioning of the country lessens the fear of genocide after our departure.
Does this call for a soft partition come across as arrogant? Absolutely! It also illustrates the fear of the unknown consequences of our departure.
The level of discourse about Iraq
within this country is fairly poor in my view.
We invaded a country -
We ripped it open -
It explodes and implodes -
Now what?

 
At 6:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Joe Biden's contribution to the Iraq war debate may be that of unheeded prophet. I'm betting the time will come when his resolution will be seen as a forecast of Things To Come, because a partition of sorts is what's going to happen. Will he be honored in his own country then?

 
At 11:19 PM, Blogger sherm said...

Unfortunately for the Iraqis the US will not settle for a final solution that meets that countries needs. The US will use its military power and wealth to attempt to mold the country into a subserviant form that is supportive of "American interests". (I'm sure CHENEY/bush dream of Musharraf style coup.)

If recent history is any judge, this effort will fail the "subserviant" objective, but support the barely hidden objective of staying in Iraq indefinitely.

Now that most of the Democratic candidates are backing away from a pledge to get us out of Iran soon, soon being earlier than 2013, there is no hope except that we be expelled.

We're on the Stairway to Hell flight, after flight, after flight, after.........

 
At 11:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In response to Senator Biden, maybe the Iraqi Parliament could pass a non binding motion to partition the United States.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home