Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, July 23, 2007

Turkish Muslim Party Wins Landslide
US Raids Umm al-Qura Mosque
Sistani said in Peril



In neighboring Turkey, the Islamically tinged AK Party won nearly 47% of the vote on Sunday, which will allow it, after a multiplier is applied, to rule with a comfortable margin without needing a coalition party. It has been suggested that the recent sabre rattling coming out of Turkey toward the Kurds in Iraq was a matter of posturing for the sake of garnering votes in the election. I suppose we are about to find out. One danger to Turkish stability, as the FT notes, is that if PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan grows too arrogant and rash as a result of his popular victory, he may respond so forcefully to the situation in Kurdistan that he accidentally produces an unnecesary crisis.

The US military raided the Umm al-Qura mosque complex in Baghdad, HQ of the Association of Muslim Scholars, and arrested 18 persons they accused of being in the guerrilla movement, including the son of the mosque's preacher. The AMS condemned the raid, as did, outside Iraq, the Arab League.

US ambassador in Iraq Ryan Crocker is asking that all Iraqi US government employees be given immigrant visas to the United States up front, according to WaPo.

It seems fairly clear that the educated middle classes are fleeing Iraq in droves and that the US government now faces a shortage of qualified translators and other employees necessary to the US enterprise in that country.

This cable from the Baghdad embassy suggests that things are very, very bad.

The NYT profiles Muqtada al-Sadr and the way he has been able to pose both as an insider and an outsider to the government at once (i.e. he knows the same tricks as Karl Rove, Bush's campaign adviser). This report suggests that the Sadr Movement is attracting southern Shiites in droves and is providing services to the poor. (Muqtada al-Sadr's father used to do that, too). The only thing I disagree with is the assertion or implication that Muqtada al-Sadr launched an anti-US military insurgency, simultaneously with or in imitation of the Sunni Arab insurgents. Muqtada did form a militia, the Mahdi Army, in summer, 2003, but it was highly disciplined and he strictly forbade it to attack US troops. It did not. The fighting between the US military and Sadr's military came only after then civil administrator Paul Bremer and Gen. Rick Sanchez suddenly announced that they intended to "kill or capture" Muqtada al-Sadr. Only then did his movement turn violent in any significant way, in self-defense.

Police in the Shiite holy city of Najaf are questioning the safety of Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani in the wake of the assassination of one of his aides in his compound, just yards away from the grand ayatollah. Radical Sunni groups have vowed several times on the internet to kill Sistani. His death might well throw Iraq into fatal turmoil.


Army Maj. Gen. Benjamin Mixon is advocating that Ninevah Province
hold provincial elections and that then US forces be withdrawn from it, leaving security duties to Iraqi army and police. He maintains that the Iraqi security forces are already operating independently there for the most part. Hear, hear! Give that man a medal and do what he says. Foreign military forces have withdrawn from 6 of Iraq's provinces (3 Kurdish-- Dohuk, Sulaymaniyah, Irbil-- and 3 Shiite--Dhi Qar, Maysan and Muthanna). Iraq has 18 provinces, so there are only 12 to go. Mosul, Najaf and Karbala are good candidates for the next 3. If the Shiite military and police cannot or will not defend security in Najaf and Karbala, they are not any good and never will be. Those provinces contain cities that mean a great deal to them.

Reuters reports that 16 bodies were found in Baghdad on Sunday.

McClatchy adds, "Around 12:30 p.m. A suicide truck bomb targeted a tribal leader house in Al Taji in Jurf Al Milah. 5 were killed and 12 were injured . . ."

Also, "Six men were killed (most of them are Kurds) and 4 other citizens were injured in the last 24 hours in Mosul is separated attacks. . ."

and

"Gunmen attacked three trucks carrying watermelon on the main road from Khanqeen to Buhruz. 6 men were killed in the attack."

Labels:

3 Comments:

At 10:54 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Dr. Cole,

If you would kindly provide a link to the FT piece you mention, it would be easier to see if I'm misinterpreting their analysis or your reference to it; however, from the looks of it they've got it backwards:

"[I]f Erdogan grows too arrogant (...) he may respond so forcefully to the situation in Kurdistan"

would be meaningful only if the opposition to Erdogan were somehow holding him back from taking forceful action towards PKK; you know, mandate and all.

Au contraire, Erdogan has been obediently following US and EU advice in the region despite calls for action in Turkey, which he considers opposition. Now that the election has turned up a landslide, one should expect his government to remain as sedate as they have in the past 4 years.

Sincerely,

Real Genius

 
At 11:48 PM, Blogger James said...

I was more than a little bit surprised to see you list Mosul (the province) as a good candidate for the next set of provinces for US troops to turn over security to Iraqi forces. It's a)Iraq's 3rd largest city, and b)isn't it in a state of seemingly-perpetual cyclical turmoil? It seems only yesterday that the Mainstream Media was trumpeting Mosul along with Kirkuk as the next "tinderbox". Pardon me, sir, but if that's still the case, what makes you suggest that?

A related question: Have you heard anything about how things are going in those 6 provinces where the coalition has pulled out? I don't mean meaningless numbers of "attacks" or "terrorist activity", etc., but rather does anyone have an idea of what forms politics are taking there, of how the various forces that were once battling the US/MNF and eachother are now functioning and interacting within (or apart from?) the structures of government? It would seem that those are places that might offer some limited perspective on Petraeus's and Crocker's repeated assertions of a bloodbath if US troops pull out at all.

cheers,
Long-Time Reader/First-Time Commenter

 
At 3:31 AM, Blogger Blue Girl, Red State said...

Sunday's election in Turkey was interesting. The ruling party, with it's roots in political Islam holds enough seats (340 of 550) to govern without forming a coalition - but not enough to make changes to the Constitution.

The rising nationalism concerns me, and I hope Erdoğan does not get swept up by it and opt to escalate tensions to crisis levels.

The Turks have every reason to be more than a little prickly about the whole PKK situation. The United States claims to be in Iraq to fight terrorists - but they give heinous, bloodthirsty criminal terrorists from the PKk safe haven in Iraq's Kurdish area. Kurdish terrorism has claimed the lives of over 35,000 people over the past two decades. Ten September 11's. Adding insult to injury, Turkey is our ally, and we give safe harbor to terrorists that kill their soldiers and citizens. Very hypocritical. Did I say hypocritical? I meant par for the course. My thoughts here, for what they are worth - with a cool graph.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home