Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

24 Killed,90 wounded;
Qadiriya Shrine Damaged in Blast


Reuters reports that 33 bodies were found in the streets of Baghdad on Monday. Karrada took mortar fire, which left 8 dead and 35 wounded. McClatchy reports that on Sunday night, guerrillas had taken 40 persons hostage in Salahuddin Province, in a bid to counter the operation of a new anti-Salafi tribal council. There were other bombings, shootings and assorted mayhem in Baghdad, Mosul and some other places.

But one above all took the cake. Guerrillas detonated a huge bomb in front of the shrine of Abdul Qadir al-Gilani (Jilani, Kilani) in central Baghdad on Monday, killing (according to Reuters, above) some 24 persons and wounding 90 according to late reports. The bombing damaged the dome and the base of the minaret of the mosque attached to the shrine.

Shaikh Abdul Qadir al-Gilani (d. 1166 A.D.) was a great mystic who founded the vast Qadiriya Sufi order.

An Ottoman mystic, Shaikh Muzaffer Ozak Efendi, later wrote of him,


' "The venerable 'Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani passed on to the Realm of Divine Beauty in A.H. 561/ 1166 C.E., and his blessed mausoleum in Baghdaad is still a place of pious visitation. He is noted for his extraordinary spiritual experiences and exploits, as well as his memorable sayings and wise teachings. It is rightly said of him that 'he was born in love, grew in perfection, and met his Lord in the perfection of love.' May the All-Glorious Lord bring us in contact with his lofty spiritual influence!" '


The Qadiri Sufi order is very important in Iraq, Nigeria, Senegal, Morocco, Turkey, Pakistan and India, among other places.

The shrine was likely attacked by radical Sunni Salafis, with several objects in mind. First, Salafis hate Sufi shrines (see below). Second, the Salafi Jihadis in Iraq are trying to mobilize all Iraqi Sunnis behind them, and do not want rivals from among the Sufi orders and tribal shaikhs. Third, the Salafi Jihadis want to throw Iraq into ever greater chaos, such that they strike at all national symbols. Fourth, they are probably hoping that at least some Sunni Arabs will blame Shiite militiamen for the attack, or will blame the Shiite government for not preventing it, so that the bombing has the effect of heightening sectarian tensions further. The guerrilla attack on the Shiite Askariya Shrine in Samarra in February, 2006, set off an orgy of sectarian violence, and was the most successful single act of terrorism the guerrillas have ever carried out.

One saving grace is that Sufis are oriented toward symbolic meaning, and physical places are therefore not central to their worship. One famous medieval Sufi, al-Hallaj, famously thought that it was better to visit God in your heart truly than to undertake a perfunctory pilgrimage to Mecca. (The orthodox were outraged.) It is a little unlikely, therefore, that there will be a backlash from this bombing in Nigeria or Senegal or India. For Iraqi Sunnis, likewise, it seems a little unlikely to produce further violence, since the imam himself blamed the radical Salafis (takfiris), themselves Sunni.

Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that Muhammad al-Isawi, the prayer leader and preacher at the mosque attached to the shrine, said, "I send condolences not only to myself but to all Iraqis for what befell this mosque for everyone, for Sunni and Shiite, for Turkmen and Kurd. Who venefits from blowing it up? We must be patient and resigned and deny any opportunity to the enemies, the Takfiri terrorists." [Takfiris are radical Salafis who declare Sufis and other non-Salafis to be non-Muslims and deserving of death.] He added, "They have idled the charitable works in the mosque, which provides food to widows, orphans and the needy; it also contains a library, to which seekers after knowledge resort. It was, truly, a cowardly act."


There are lots of strands of Sunni Islam. Many of them are better thought of as tendencies than as sects in their own right. If we make an analogy to Christianity, so there are scriptural literalists (fundamentalists), and there are mystics seeking union with God, and there is everything in between.

The mystics organized into orders or brotherhoods (tariqa) are called Sufis. (The etymology of 'Sufi' is disputed. Some say it refers to the early mystics' preference for woollen (suf) cloaks. Others say it is derived from the Greek Sophia or wisdom.) The mystics typically get together on a Thursday night (or other occasion) at the mosque and sit in a circle and chant spiritual verses and listen to the teachings of their spiritual master or shaikh (in Persian, pir). Some Sufi meetings, with their chanting and rhythmic dancing, resemble Pentacostal services in Christianity. When the shaikh died, often a shrine grew up around his tomb, which was thought a center of blessings and people would come there to touch it and be cured of infertility and other woes.

Sufism was so successful as an organized movement from about the 1100s that it took over Islam, and there were very few Muslims who were not in some sense Sufis in the period 1200 through about 1850. From the mid-1700s, Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab in Arabia began attacking Sufism. The attacks were taken up and refined by the Salafis (revivalists) of the late 19th and early 20th century. It began being argued, under Wahhabi and Salafi influence, that it was wrong to attend at shrines, wrong to seek the intercession of saints, wrong to chant and to dance for God. Modern Wahhabism (mostly a Saudi Arabian phenomenon) and Salafism (much more widespread) have a "Protestant" character to them, emphasizing puritanism and the casting down of all images (iconoclasm) and saints' shrines.

Sufism has rapidly declined in much of the Muslim world. The Sufi orders still have a central place in society and even politics in Senegal. The Sufis of Morocco are not inconsiderable. But they no longer are in the mainstream in Egypt and are minor affairs in Palestine, Syria and Jordan. The Sufis of the Hijaz in western Arabia are said to be having a bit of a revival, but Wahhabism has reduced them to a shadow of their former selves. Aside from Morocco, Iraq may have been the Arab country with the biggest Sufi presence, both among Sunni Arabs and among Kurds (a lot of Kurds in Iraq, Iran and Turkey are Sufis and some are Qadiris).

Some of the Sufi orders, including branches of the Qadiriya, have at one time or another joined the Sunni Arab insurgency (a major guerrilla leader at Falluja was a Qadiri shaikh). Other branches of the Qadiriya have, however, been quietists and avoided politics (the shrine keeper is in that category, another reason that the shrine may have been hit).

There is a whole web site on al-Gilani and his order by an adherent.

Labels:

8 Comments:

At 7:03 AM, Blogger Brian Ulrich said...

I've read that Barzani's party has close links to a Sufi order, though I forget which. Is it the Qadiris, and if so, could the Kurds also be a major target of this?

 
At 3:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The article refers to salafis as sunnis, which is definately not true. Saudis and their like should stop being called sunni. Many traditional sunni scholars have written against salafis and considered them out of the fold of the ahle sunnah wal jamaat.

 
At 4:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

When I was in Iraq, the Gailani complex was more considered a Sunni shrine than a Sufi one.

While there's no denying shifts in attitude take place, it would be good to have more evidence. The remarks of the prayer leader are important evidence, but in the immediate aftermath of the bombing are more likely to represent existing prejudices than real knowledge.

What one can say about the bombing, is that it seems to have been a typical attack upon people; and the damage to the shrine was, as they say, "collateral".

Could have been Sadrists, Badrists or Salafis.

Quite different from the Samarra bombing, which was a professional attack upon a building, with no deaths or injuries.

 
At 4:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Al-Qadir bombing has become a whodunnit.

Iraqi cleric accuses US of bombing shrine

Related

These Mongols Came From the West

--
Imam accuses the Americans of the Bombing Al-Qadir Sufi shrine

 
At 12:07 AM, Blogger Hans Wall said...

Professor Cole,
A case of Salafist terror against Sufism is the Taliban persecution of the Afghan Sufi orders. Since Sufi pirs are known to play an important role as mediators in tribal conflicts the attack could also target the ongoing mediation process between Sunni and Shia in Iraq. An insiders view of Sufism in Iraq can be found at Sufi Journeys website. Kurdistan seems to play more the role of a safe haven.

 
At 7:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sufi orders are still quite influential in Kurdistan. A commenter above asked about the Barzani family - actually they are historically Naqshabandi, but the Qadriyyah sufi order is very strong in Erbil, Kirkuk and even in Koisanjaq, where Jalal Talabani's family originates. Talabani is not especially religious, but his roots are in the more liberal, heterodox sufi perspective that is common in Kurdistan. Even though many Kurds do not ascribe to sufi identity, the social networks that inform politics in Kurdistan have in many cases a sufi background.

Blowing up this shrine will be seen as an outrage by the vast majority of Kurds.

 
At 12:56 AM, Blogger bhattathiri said...

Excellant blog.Gilani's Management has become a part and parcel of everyday life, be it at home, in the office or factory and in Government. In all organizations, where a group of human beings assemble for a common purpose irrespective of caste, creed, and religion, management principles come into play through the management of resources, finance and planning, priorities, policies and practice. Management is a systematic way of carrying out activities in any field of human effort. Management need to focus more on leadership skills, e.g., establishing vision and goals, communicating the vision and goals, and guiding others to accomplish them. It also assert that leadership must be more facilitative, participative and empowering in how visions and goals are established and carried out. Some people assert that this really isn't a change in the management functions, rather it's re-emphasizing certain aspects of management.

 
At 4:59 PM, Blogger 'Abd al-Karim said...

Hans Wall said:

"A case of Salafist terror against Sufism is the Taliban persecution of the Afghan Sufi orders."

The Taliban were not Salafis, they were in fact Sufis. Mullah Omar is a Shaykh of the Nashbandi Mujaddidi Tariqah and was devoted to the Deobandi Hanafi interpretation of Islam, which, while sharing some similarities with Salafism, is vastly different. The Sufis that the Taliban persecuted were of the rival "Barelvi" interpretation of the Hanafi madhhab. The Taliban also persecuted the Ahle Hadees, the Salafis of South Asia.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home