Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Dadullah Claim on UBL "Unreliable"

The USG Open Source Center has translated the transcript of a Pakistani television interview program that casts doubt on the claim by Mulla Dadullah that Usamah Bin Laden planned out the attack on Bagram, and is also behind the guerrillas in Iraq.






Taliban Commander Claim on UBL
Geo News TV
Thursday, April 26, 2007

Program: "Today With Kamran Khan"

Karachi Geo News television in Urdu at 1800 GMT on 25 April relays live from its Karachi studio regularly scheduled "Today with Kamran Khan" program. Noted Pakistan journalist Kamran Khan reviews, discusses, and analyzes major day-to-day developments with government ministers and officials, opposition leaders and noted analysts . . .

Segment V

Kamran Khan says the "most reliable" Taliban Commander Mulla Dadullah has made a "startling revelation" in an Al-Jazeera TV interview that the suicide attack at the Bagram airbase in Afghanistan targeted US Vice President Dick Cheney and it was "planned and supervised by Usama Bin Ladin himself." Khan says this is for the first time in last few years that the report has come about Usama Bin Ladin's operational activity from a "credible source" as Mullah Dadullah is considered close to Al-Qa'ida and he is the top most commander of Taliban.

Kamran Khan establishes telephonic contact in Peshawar with Rahimullah Yusufzai, prominent Afghan affairs analyst, and asks him how "//credible//" is Mulla Dadullah's claim. Yusufzai says when the Bagram suicide attack took place, a Taliban spokesman had then claimed that "the Taliban have carried out the suicide attack." Yusufzai adds that the Taliban at that time did not say that the attack was carried out by Al-Qa'ida or supervised by Usama Bin Ladin. Yusufzai says the attack took place about 2 months ago and Dadullah's claim has come after a long period. Yusufzai thinks that if the attack was supervised by Usama Bin Ladin, he would have claimed it "right away" because it was a big success that the Bagram airbase was attacked, which caused a "big //embarrassment//" to the United States. Continuing, Yusufzai says Dadullah himself has now become a "controversial" figure among the Taliban ranks because of his recent activities, including "beheading" people. Yusufzai says so it is not right to describe Dadullah as "credible" and "important" Taliban leader. Yusufzai believes that Dadullah has made the claim under a "//strategy//" to "//mislead//" the United States and the NATO. Yusufzai thinks that Usama Bin Ladin is "alive, but non-functional and it is not possible for him to plan or supervise Al-Qa'ida activities." Yusufzai says according to his information, Al-Qa'ida does not have enough volunteers and cadres that it could plan attacks like one on Bagram airbase. Yusufzai adds that most of the suicide attacks in Afghanistan are being carried out by Taliban.

(Description of Source: Karachi Geo News TV in Urdu -- 24-hour satellite news TV channel owned by Pakistan's Jang publishing group).

Labels:

3 Comments:

At 5:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

'Yusufzai thinks that if the attack was supervised by Usama Bin Ladin, he would have claimed it "right away" because it was a big success that the Bagram airbase was attacked, which caused a "big //embarrassment//" to the United States. '

I've often wonder if, following that logic, bin Laden ever actually claimed credit for the attacks on the WTC of September 11th 2001 (not counting the various obviously fake discredited video tapes that were current for a while). But is there any clear, unambiguous claiming of credit by Bin Laden or Al Qaeda that is widely accepted? If so, what? If not, why not?

 
At 9:21 AM, Blogger Billy Glad said...

Mr. al-Maliki must feel under incredible pressure from the Democratic Congress and anti-occupation forces in America to show progress. I can't think of another reason why he would withhold casualty figures from the UN.

 
At 12:51 PM, Blogger Da' Buffalo Amongst Wolves said...

The latest Iraq to join the Refugee ranks is:

Riverbend, the blogstress of Baghdad.

"I remember Baghdad before the war- one could live anywhere. We didn't know what our neighbors were- we didn't care. No one asked about religion or sect. No one bothered with what was considered a trivial topic: are you Sunni or Shia? You only asked something like that if you were uncouth and backward. Our lives revolve around it now. Our existence depends on hiding it or highlighting it- depending on the group of masked men who stop you or raid your home in the middle of the night.

On a personal note, we've finally decided to leave. I guess I've known we would be leaving for a while now. We discussed it as a family dozens of times. At first, someone would suggest it tentatively because, it was just a preposterous idea- leaving ones home and extended family- leaving ones country- and to what? To where?

Since last summer, we had been discussing it more and more. It was only a matter of time before what began as a suggestion- a last case scenario- soon took on solidity and developed into a plan. For the last couple of months, it has only been a matter of logistics. Plane or car? Jordan or Syria? Will we all leave together as a family? Or will it be only my brother and I at first?

After Jordan or Syria- where then? Obviously, either of those countries is going to be a transit to something else. They are both overflowing with Iraqi refugees, and every single Iraqi living in either country is complaining of the fact that work is difficult to come by, and getting a residency is even more difficult. There is also the little problem of being turned back at the border. Thousands of Iraqis aren't being let into Syria or Jordan- and there are no definite criteria for entry, the decision is based on the whim of the border patrol guard checking your passport."

In full [Here]


Usama bin laden, nor AQ, nor Saddam Hussein, nor any other 'regional players' caused her to become a displaced person. America's MURDEROUS FOREIGN POLICY dictates caused that.

People like Usama bin-laden and the other fundamentalist/mercenary creeps would have been insignificant ciphers in the universe without U.S. 'assistance', funding, and indeed parallel policies. (Like the necon/bin-laden axis-of-hate relationship with Saudi Arabia)

My sentiments are fully displayed [Here]

 

Post a Comment

<< Home