US pours millions into anti-Taliban militias in Afghanistan
US pours millions into anti-Taliban militias in Afghanistan | World news | The Guardian
Didn't Reagan already try this in the 1980s?
End/ (Not Continued)
Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion
Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute
US pours millions into anti-Taliban militias in Afghanistan | World news | The Guardian
Didn't Reagan already try this in the 1980s?
End/ (Not Continued)
posted by Juan Cole @ 11/23/2009 01:41:00 AM
| |
---|
| |
---|
Muslim Denunciations of al-Qaeda and Terrorism
Suggested Books about the Middle East
Michigan War Studies Review. Many excellent resources.
Individual items can be linked to through the permalink in the time of posting at the end.
Write your political representatives via Congress.org.
ARCHIVES
The feed address is http://www.juancole.com/ rss.xml
Awards
Winner, October 5, 2007, Scott Nearing Award for Courageous Scholarship (Awarded by the Graduate Students of the Political Science Department, University of Pennsylvania).
Winner, 2005 James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism, Hunter College.
Winner, 2004 Koufax Award for Best Expert Blog
Winner, 2004 Koufax Award for Best
Posting
6 Comments:
Yes, Reagan did try that in the 80's, but since when does the US Gov't learn from history? Only great leaders respect history.
I know the history of US involvement in Afganistan has been on bad or pooly implented tactic or another, but isn't this the same general idea that has brought a semblance of stability to Iraq? Right now every possible action involves risk, including withdrawal.
Dear Professor Cole
The big difference is the Taliban don't have helicopters so giving people Stinger won't work this time.
This and Aram Roston's article in the Nation, "How the US Funds the Taliban" is being picked up by every credible news outlet... The war profiteers, both the corrupt US and Afghan, appear to be the only ones interested in continuing the latest episode of the GREAT GAME. Unfortunately, we're broke and printing money so it can continue.
The generals are complicit in the BIG LIE, historically telling every president that with more money, troops and time everything will be wonderful and we can WIN.
Paul: "...isn't this the same general idea that has brought a semblance of stability to Iraq?...."
No. Geez Paul, where have you been?? Iraq was STABLE before the US arrived to take control. Iraq had health care, enough food for everyone, relatively non-porous borders, a professional middle class, high literacy, institutions of higher education that functioned, sewers that worked, clean water, and electricity. Even FOREIGNERS could safely and comfortably and reliably travel there because Iraq possessed those amenities. The US military DESTROYED OR DEGRADED all those amenities of modern life. Saddam Hussein didn't do that. The Taliban didn't do that. Al Quaeda didn't do that. The Russians didn't do that. The Chinese didn't do that. The Communists didn't do that. American did that. Deal with it.
Geez James!
That was then, this isn't. We have to deal with the situation as it is NOW. Buying off your enemies is a tried and true tactic. It DID work in Iraq and it could work in Afghanistan. Getting the Afghanis to fight for us and control their local affairs beats bombing the shit out of them and killing more of them and us.
Post a Comment
<< Home