Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, June 29, 2009

Sunday's Protest March Broken Up;
Rafsanjani Defers to Khamenei

The phase of mass protest in the aftermath of the controversial election results of June 12 has drawn to a close for the moment. Movement activists can no longer put tens of thousands of protesters in the street because the security forces are too well organized and too loyal to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to allow it. Opposition leader Mir Hosain Mousavi has been increasingly indecisive on tactics even if he has been steadfast in demanding a rematch with incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

AP reports that the march for Mir Hosain Mousavi on Shariati Street by some 3,000 activists was violently repressed by the security forces, despite its having been a legal procession in part commemorating the killing in 1981 of revolutionary founding father Mohammad Beheshti (see below). Police used tear gas and clubs to disperse the marchers, attacking them and in some case breaking bones. The demonstrators had been chanting "where's my vote?" and some were wearing green, the symbolic color of the Mousavi movement. They also by their chants tied Mir Hosain Mousavi to Imam Hosain, the grandson of the Prophet Muhmmad, who was killed by the repressive Umayyad government in 680 CE. The implication is that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is the equivalent of the Umayyad Caliph Yazid, who is despised by Shiite Muslims as the author of the martyrdom of Imam Hosain.

Opposition leader Mehdi Karroubi himself had joined in the march on Sunday.

The European Union condemned Iran for detaining 8 Iranian employees of the British Embassy on charges that they were involved in fomenting the post-election protests-- charges that the British government vehemently denied.

Reuters reports that late Sunday some of the embassy personnel were released.

In a bad sign for Mousavi, his ally former president Akbar Hashimi Rafsanjani appeared to desert him on Sunday. The USG Open Source Center translates from official Iranian radio:

'FYI -- Iran: Rafsanjani Cites 'Complicated Plots,' Calls for 'Solidarity'
Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Document Type: OSC Summary

Tehran Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1 in Persian at 1630 GMT on 28 June broadcast its scheduled newscast, which included an item on remarks by Ayatollah Hashemi-Rafsanjani, Chairman of the Expediency Council, in a meeting the families of the "martyrs" of the 7 Tir incident, that is 28 June 1981, when the head of Judiciary and some other officials were killed in a bomb blast.

Rafsanjani referred to the recent incidents after the results of the presidential elections, saying: "The incidents were the results of complicated plots by obscure sources with the aim of creating separation and differences between the people and the system. And with the aim of making the people distrust the Islamic system."
He said Ayatollah Khamene'i's expedience in extending the deadline by the Guardian Council for a better study of the issues and providing convincing explanations and clearing any doubts was a very valuable measure. He added: "In my opinion, the recent order by the leadership was one of the very valuable decisions he made. That is he asked the Guardian Council to extend the legal time, which was over, to study the complaints. And a group was appointed to help the Guardian Council with this regard."

Rafsanjani said: "We should all make a step with cooperation and solidarity to remove the obstacles and solve the problems." He also said: "We should always end the election results with solidarity. If every election would result in discord - we have an election once a year - and there would be hatred and fighting, then there will be nothing left." . .

(Description of Source: Tehran Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1 in Persian -- state-run television) '


Rafsanjani has clearly decided to defer to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on handling the outcome of the elections, and has come out as critical of the crowd politics and occasional turbulence they produced. As a multi-billionaire and man of the establishment, he may well have been frightened that the massive street rallies for Mousavi a week ago signalled a danger to the status quo, which he is attempting to preserve. From Rafsanjani's point of view, Khamenei, Ahmadinejad and others have been making a slow-motion coup, reducing the sigificance and openness of the of the system by excluding the reformists from running for office. Wanting to go back to 1997 is not the same as wanting a revolution.

On the other hand, Grand Ayatollah Bayyat Zanjani issued a statement defending the right of the protesters to rally peacefully and condemning the violent crackdown on them. There are nearly 30 grand ayotallahs in the Shiite world, the majority of them resident in the holy city of Qom in Iran. Despite their lack of political power, they could be influential in determing how the public remembers the election and what aspirations Iranians have for the future.

The real victors of a successful squelching of the protest movement would be the Revolutionary Guards, who have been making a hard line slow-motion coup for some time.

Dilip Hiro explains the background of the current events and concludes that Iran's regime has moved in an authoritarian direction, raising questions about whether a fundamentalist Muslim movement is compatible with democracy.

Middle East Report has a substantial overview of the Iran crisis and its historical roots.

End/ (Not Continued)

12 Comments:

At 4:59 AM, Blogger gdamiani said...

It was obvious from the famous Friday speech of the Supreme Leader that Akbar Hashimi Rafsanjani had deserted Mousavi. I don't understand how nobody of our experts have spotted it at the time. Grand Ayat Allah Khameini took care to name him and nearly "sanctified" him. From that day on the so called opposition movement was doomed, Grand Ayat Allah Khameini had outmanoeuvred them. It was blatantly obvious for who wanted to see

 
At 10:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2009/06/good-demonstrators-versus-bad.html

June 29, 2009

Good Demonstrators versus Bad Demonstrators

Just look at how demonstrators (in Honduras) are portrayed when they don't fit the foreign policy agenda of the US empire: "Hundreds of pro-Zelaya * protesters, some of them masked and wielding sticks, set up barricades in the center of the capital, Tegucigalpa, and sealed off road access to the presidential palace." ** This is a popular movement that wishes to preserve democracy. Why is it not getting the twitter and attention? And the demonstrators in Honduras are not chanting Allahu Akbar and are not calling for the return to the teachings of Khomeini.

* Deposed President Manuel Zelaya

** http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31594944/ns/world_news-americas/

-- As'ad AbuKhalil

 
At 11:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Juan Cole,

Caution: Rafsanjani was talking to families of 73 Islamic Republic Party members killed by the People's Mujahedin of Iran on 28th of June 1981 called 7th of Tir (Hafte Tir). His words:

"The incidents were the results of complicated plots by obscure sources with the aim of creating separation and differences between the people and the system. And with the aim of making the people distrust the Islamic system."

refer to 1981, not 2009's election or opposition. The source, "Tehran Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network" (a state run propaganda machine) presented Rafsanjani's words out of context and the USG Open Source Center's translating wizards took the bait.

Furthermore, Rafsanjani compliment to the "leadership":

"In my opinion, the recent order by the leadership was one of the very valuable decisions he made. That is he asked the Guardian Council to extend the legal time, which was over, to study the complaints. And a group was appointed to help the Guardian Council with this regard."

is typical, good Iranian logic. There is little statistical doubt June 12th election wasn't hijacked so why not compliment the "leadership" for allowing more time to examine complaints when everybody knows the election was a fraud.

Rafsanjani cannot risk his place as Chairman of Iran's Assembly of Experts (or Expediency Council), given the assembly is the only possible way of legally removing Khamenei without sparking blood bath, which comparatively speaking might well make 1979's Islamic revolution look like a walk in the park.

James Sexton

 
At 12:34 PM, Anonymous Neil B said...

" ...raising questions about whether a fundamentalist Muslim movement is compatible with democracy."

Er, I suppose that a fundamentalist Muslim movement would not be compatible with democracy. Am I right?

 
At 1:50 PM, Anonymous lidia said...

anyone still "naive" enough to believe in USA "support" for democrcy in the non-white states should look no futher than Honduras. There IS a coup, a real one, against democratically elected president, so what USA said? Oh, they call to "both sides" to respect democracy. How nice of them, really. Of course, the protesters against the military coup there are NOT called heroes by the same imperialist media that support without question a western-friendly riot in Iran.

 
At 2:10 PM, Anonymous Sulayman said...

Bayat (not "Bayyat") Zanjani is a mujtahid, though not one of the "nearly 30 grand ayatullahs in the Shi'ite world."

The term ayatullah is quite fluid; if you use it to refer to any mujtahid (doctor of Islamic law), there are hundreds in the Shi'ite world. If you are referring to the most senior scholars according to traditional Shi'ite measures, Bayat Zanjani would not figure on the list.

So it's inaccurate to say his views will influence the public's memory of the election, at least as far as their memory of the senior clerics' response to it is concerned.

If anything, Bayat Zanjani's statements will serve to document the variety of opinion that exists within the seminary of Qum, not to represent the opinion of its senior clerics.

 
At 7:27 PM, Blogger Gifted one said...

Col. Pat Lang at the SST blog writes this, "The war parties in the US and Israel have taken up a new propaganda theme. They are now saying that a "military coup" by the IRGC and other "radicals" has taken place and that the resulting regime is no longer under the influence and control of the Shia 'ulema. The new theme insists that the new "coup junta" symbolically headed by Khamenei is even more dangerous and more likely to rashly use nuclear weapons as an expression of their lunacy."

I agree with him. I wonder if your analysis isn't providing cover for neocon, regime change nutters Prof. Cole. Or maybe you now advocate regime change in Tehran? I just want to be clear about your analytical endgame.

 
At 7:47 PM, Blogger Ian said...

i read one report that massive amounts of money are being trasferred out of the iranian banks to international banks by the elite on both sides of the battle, as if something big is about to go down forcing one side to leave town

 
At 8:57 PM, Anonymous Mari said...

Maybe we should be asking ourselves if our unregulated fundamentalist Capitalistic government, which works hand in hand with the major media conglomerates to brainwash the American people, compatible with Democracy?

 
At 11:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Juan I think you're misinterpreting this instance. Rafsanjani's wife and daughter were both at the Ghobi mosque rally and his daughter in particular has been known to stoke the flames of the revolutionists - I think that is very telling. He himself can't issue strong rhetoric denouncing the regime because he risks losing his political positions but that doesn't mean that he won't act in the future.

what he needs to back up his action is strong support from the clerical establishment. this has been steadily building as the regime cracks down on protesters and imprisons more and more - it seems every day a new Ayatollah is issuing a statement condemning the elections or the regime's response. The backing of the clerics is the only punch behind anything Rafsanjani might do.

He has limited opportunities to act and he seems to be biding his time. There have been some reliable Iranian Twitterers who remind readers that much of the military respects Rafsanjani greatly, perhaps he is waiting for more splits to emerge.

I just think it is entirely too premature to declare that he has "abandoned" Mousavi and the reformers...

 
At 5:07 PM, Anonymous Mar said...

Eric Walberg's take on Iran:

June was a busy month for two of Washington’s real ‘Axis of Evil’. Venezuela’s Chavez completed his nationalisation of oil and Iran’s Ahmedinejad stemmed a Western-backed colour revolution, leaving both bad boys in place, muses Eric Walberg



http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/search/label/eric%20walberg

 
At 9:06 PM, Anonymous Mari said...

Obama faces a Persian rebuff
By M K Bhadrakumar

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KG01Ak03.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home