Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Ahmadinejad Slams Obama;
70 Professors Arrested;
Wednesday Protest Violently Attacked

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who stands accused of stealing the recent election in Iran, lashed out at Barack Obama on Thursday. He demanded an apology from the White House for what he termed interference in Iranian affairs, and said Obama had started talking like George W. Bush. He said that Obama's current stance was not a promising basis for going forward with direct talks, a clumsy threat to refuse to cooperate with Washington in any way.

Obama, of course, has not in fact interfered in Iranian domestic politics, for which he has been slammed by hawks who apparently want an invasion. All he did was to object to regime violence toward peaceful protesters and regime abrogation of the right to peaceable assembly.

The BBC is reporting that a victory celebration by the Iranian elite to which 290 MPs were invited ended up being poorly attended, with only 105 showing up.

Ahmadinejad's attempt to shift the blame for the crisis to Obama is an appeal to his base, which I would estimate at 20% of the population, who live for conspiracy theories. But if he were really a politician instead of just being a martinet he would be trying to craft a discourse that would attract the center and mollify the reformists. He is incapable, obviously, of achieving such broad appeal, and no doubt deeply envies Obama's widespread popularity, even inside Iran.

The LAT reports that 70 professors have been arrested in Iran for meeting with Mir Hosain Mousavi, the opposition leader who alleges that the vote in the recent presidential election was rigged. The report in Persian is here. They are members of the Islamic Association of University Teachers.

Hundreds of rock-throwing demonstrators tried to gather in downtown Tehran on Wednesday afternoon, but they met a phalanx of determined security forces who dispersed them by main force. Some 1,000 protesters were said to have gathered near the parliament building before allegedly being attacked.

Opposition leader Mir Hosain Mousavi's web site denied that he was under house arrest, as some observers had alleged, but acknowledged that he was under surveillance. He vowed to continue to attend peaceful rallies. His wife, Zahra Rahnevard, said at the web site that Iran had descended into "martial law."

Patrick Martin at the Globe and Mail wonders if the mass protest movement is petering out in Iran. He raises the question of whether the process of a successful crackdown on the reformists will leave Iran more militarized and more rightwing than ever before. Chilling.

Then there were two. Mohsen Rezaie, one of four candidates for president in the recent elections, has withdrawn his objections to the vote tally, which alleged that Rezaie got less than a million votes and that incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gained almost 63%. Rezaie, a former commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, is, like Ahmadinejad, a hard liner. But he had joined his two reformist rivals in questioning the official vote tallies. He said he was withdrawing his complaint because "political, social and security situation has entered a sensitive and decisive phase, which is more important than the election . . . I feel it is my duty... taking into account my pledge as a soldier of the revolution, the leader and the people, to inform you that I renounce following up on my complaints."

I stressed last week that the outcome in Iran would depend in some large part on whether the security forces split. Neil MacFarquhar has been doing good analysis at the NYT on the new leader of the Revolutionary Guards, Muhammad Ali Jafari, a counterinsurgency specialist; and the way in which Ahmadinejad packed these security forces' leadership with his men.

End/ (Not Continued)

18 Comments:

At 6:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The conflict seems to have moved from street demonstrations to behind-the-scenes polarization among the political/religious elite.

This is good. The masses have already registerd their disgust with the regime, and there is no need for more suffering of unarmed civilians at the hands of state butchers.

The masses have no plans for what happens next anyway. Total chaos will be bad for everyone, so perhaps gradual change is the best solution, provided that future changes are credibly promised.

 
At 6:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was kind of hoping the Iranians would achieve a revolution like the Russians did that overthrew the USSR.

Ronald Wilson Reagan (666) did NOT defeat the USSR, the Russian people did...bless them.

davr

 
At 8:44 AM, Blogger Satya said...

Professor Cole, I was wondering your take on this story claiming that according to unconfirmed reports, Rafsanjani has enough support in the assembly of experts to remove Khamanei from power. The article suggests that the debate is whether to eliminate the position of Supreme Leader entirely, or just to replace it or redefine its role. The article doesn't specify it's sources and it sounds too good to be true. What would a Constitutional action against Khamanei look like?

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/20090624/refsanjani-khamenei-iran-iranian-protests.htm

 
At 9:23 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

no matter what the outcome the persian youth won ....they won the heart of the world.

 
At 11:04 AM, Blogger Naj said...

Juan, there is a type in the name of JafAri. Correction will help search engines.

Also, the Kalameh newspaper is now raided and closed, its staff ALL arrested. Mousavi's issued a statement. He keeps calling people to calm and to not agitate the basijis so to avoid foreign opportunism which aims to undermine his movement. I think it is important that you write a piece on Mousavi's adamant stance AGAINST foreign meddling and his insistence on CALM.

 
At 11:12 AM, Blogger gdamiani said...

There is a lot of wishful thinking and glaring omissions in the reporting.

The Islamic revolution happened not because of the 40 days mourning ceremony but because of the bazaari (in other word the Iranian that work) going on strike. The faith of the Shah was sealed at this moment and only at this moment when the military and the bazzari (the business people) became two pillars of the revolution, it is not the case this time and has never been. This protest was only confined to a specific segment of the population which is not enough to overthrow a government.

Strangely enough nobody wants to admit it or even report it in the West that the call for a general strike by the "opposition" was an utter and total flop. It is glaringly obvious that this movement is mostly an urban youth protest... and for those who wish to engage in flowery comment may I remind them that even the 1968 European youth won the heart of the world to what effect ?

 
At 12:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
I was afflicted with such high hopes.

"It is finish-ed."
-----Messiah, G. F. Handel.

"Don't let it be forgot
That once there was a spot,
For one brief, shining moment
That was known as Camelot."
-----Camelot, A. J. Lerner.

a student of theater on stages large and small
.

 
At 1:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2009/06/in-one-week-tell-cnn-to-twitter-this.html

June 25, 2009

In One Week: Tell CNN to Twitter This

"Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) Continue Systematic Attacks against Palestinian Civilians and Property in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and Continue to Impose a Total Siege of the Gaza Strip

- Five Palestinian civilians, including a journalist, and an international human rights defender were wounded. - IOF conducted 19 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank. - IOF arrested 22 Palestinian civilians, including two children, in the West Bank. - IOF have continued to impose a total siege on the OPT and have isolated the Gaza Strip from the outside world. - IOF troops positioned at military checkpoints have continued to harass Palestinian civilians. - IOF have continued measures aimed at establishing a Jewish majority in occupied east Jerusalem. - IOF forced two Palestinian civilians to demolish their homes, and issued demolition orders against several homes. - IOF have continued settlement activities in the West Bank and Israeli settlers have continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property."

http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900SID/PSLG-7TCFZY?OpenDocument&RSS20=02-P

-- As'ad AbuKhalil

 
At 2:54 PM, Blogger MonsieurGonzo said...

Glenn Greenwald : “The "Neda video," torture, and the truth-revealing power of images ...reveals to us a largely un-reported exchange between the President and that venerable Presidential reporter, Helen Thomas during Mr. Obama's recent "Iran Statement" press conference : “[commenting on the "Neda Video"] "anybody who sees it knows that there's something fundamentally unjust" about the violence; and paying homage to "certain international norms of freedom of speech, freedom of expression" -- Helen Thomas, who hadn't been called on, interrupted to ask Mr. Obama to reconcile those statements about the Iranian images with his efforts at home to suppress America's own torture photos ("Then why won't you allow the photos --"). The President quickly cut her off with these remarks: Hold on a second, Helen. That's a different question! (Laughter)

Eric Margolis : “Iran: Electronic Warfare Versus the Islamic Republic ...tweaks our naiveté by exploring the West's illusions of "the innocence of raw information" and the presumption that "we have a universal human right" = freedom to Tweet : “...we have been watching an intensifying western propaganda campaign against Iran, mounted by the US and British governments. We almost exclusively hear highly colored commentary and analysis that comes from bitterly anti-regime Iranian exiles, 'experts' with an ax to grind, and US neocons yearning for war with Iran. Wishful thinking and cheerleading has largely supplanted news reporting in the American and British media. In viewing the Muslim world, Westerners keep listening to those who make a profession of telling them what they want to hear, rather than the facts. We are at it again in Iran... While the majority of protests we see in Tehran are genuine and spontaneous, Western intelligence agencies and media are playing a key role in sustaining the uprising and providing communications, including the newest electronic method, via Twitter. These are covert techniques developed by US intelligence during recent "flower" revolutions in Ukraine and Georgia that brought pro-US governments to power; and are not seen by régimes Over There or Over Here as being so "innocent", thus.

 
At 3:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Obama, of course, has not in fact interfered in Iranian domestic politics,"

When Cole writes about Obama not interfering he ignores the Iran Democracy Fund.

It is true that Obama has not renewed the program.

"no money has been earmarked for such programs in the administration’s fiscal 2010 foreign operations budget request."

http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_Democracy_Iran/2009/06/19/227155.html

However, the program to influence Iranian elections will simply not be renewed AFTER the elections are over.

It's a little like saying that people stopped donating money to Obama after he was elected president.

Since most of that money was promised and is still in the process of being paid out, it's ridiculous to say the US is not interfering with their elections when the program (despite not being renewed) is still in effect.

 
At 3:42 PM, Anonymous lidia said...

davr

I am NOT going post there about Iran, but as a former citisen of the USSR I could STATE that the MAJORITY of USSR citisens did NOT wanted to ruin it. Gorbachev and Eltzin are hated in Russia and are seemed as Western agents. Putin, on the other hand, is popular partly because he is seemed as a person who mended a bit what Gorbachev and Eltzin had broke.So please, before posting about such matters (not mentioning Iran) could somebody please LOOK at facts and NOT at Western prop?

On the other hand, it was very silly of me ask such impossible things from prof. Cole loyal readers.

 
At 4:39 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

manije: They won martyrdom, retaining forever an image free of the disillusion that comes with time and age. That has 'value' in every society that isn't entirely wiped out: if this regime were aiming to eradicate a truly distinct group, it might have prospect for lasting 'success', but instead it's killing, disabling, disabling and suppressing political dissidents within its own group. Based on the reported history of Iran back over a century, it's hard to find a decade, let alone a generation, free of uprising. If I was speaking with Professor Cole, I'd asked whether he thinks what might be different since the Islamic Revolution came in is that the regime of each moment is working within some consciousness of something like ten-year cycles.

 
At 6:34 PM, Blogger Gifted one said...

Iran is now "militarized and rightwing"?
Just the other day we read of how Iran hasn't fought a war of aggression in decades, and now this...
Surely Prof you meant Israel?

 
At 7:45 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

The bitter end of the Iranian reform movement

Now it becomes clear that, after some thought, the Israelis have completely written off the Iranian reformists.

This is the only explanation for the massive pro-reformist rhetoric in the Israeli and US neocon media. But media campaign is not all that matters.

Now Liberman joined his chief and accused Obama of abandoning the Iranian reform movement.

Needless to say, the neocon pro-reform enthusiasm is exactly what Ahmadinejad and Basij keep in mind when they track the Western reaction to their policies.

So, Liberman knows for sure that by praising the Iranian reformers, he effectively seals their political death sentence.

By the way, there is absolutely nothing special about Ahmadinejad's anti-Obama rhetoric. Reading presstv.ir, it is easy to notice how close Khomeinist and Likudist political languages are!

 
At 11:46 PM, Blogger Blå rev said...

To Davr regarding what the majority of the citizens of the Soviet union wanted:
I'm travelling in Lithuania now, and those who are old enough to remember would laugh at your assertion. Gorbatsjov and Yeltsin were only expressions of the will of the majority of population who were fed up. If they hate Gorbatsjov today, it is because he tried to slow or stop their revolution. In fact, most of them think Ronald Reagan was the man of the hour.

 
At 9:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Roger well spoken coming from a ..what American/British technocrat.

What do you surmise happened in USSR, you did not live during Gorby/Yelstin time as Davr did. I am not Russian, as someone from Ex-Yug I know the power of money-handlers/NGOs/Westernized meddling.

Yelstin was a drunk and he was a tool of Sachs and the other NYC bankers. He used Russia for personal profit and gain, this picture is repeated in geogaphic scenarios all over the world for quite some time.

 
At 12:09 PM, Anonymous drew3000 said...

Thanks Juan, for continuing to get some decent analysis out. There seems to be a lot of backstabbing on this issue among the U.S. left, and you're getting some of it. Respect the thick skin.

I appreciate the look at Iran that doesn't always include the notion that the people protesting are 3 million agetns of the U.S./Israeli apparatus, and may actually be genuinly disturbed with what's going on in their country.

Keep on keepin' on

 
At 1:42 PM, Anonymous lidia said...

It was NOT davr, but my answer to him/her. I wonder, from WHOM Roger got his info. I AM laughing at supposing that for the majority of USSR citisens Reagan was ANYTHING but the man who "joked" publicly about ordering of nuking their country (and them)

Anon 9:48 AM, exactly my point

 

Post a Comment

<< Home