Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Pakistani Army Takes Capital of Buner, Pushing Back Taliban Advance; Obama Considering More Aid

The Pakistani military parachuted soldiers Tuesday into Buner, in the Malakand district of the North-West Frontier Province, to take on the estimated 500 militants who had made a bid to take over Buner. From all accounts, the Pakistani government of Asaf Ali Zardari does not think what happens in Buner is actually very important. But the Obama administration, alarmed at the spread of the Pakistani Taliban further into Malakand (which borders Afghanistan and so has security implications for US & NATO troops) has pressured Islamabad to intervene. LAT quotes former interior minister Tasnim Noorani to the effect that the Pakistani government will actually have to rule in Malakand if it is to succeed, since surgical military operations are unlikely to have a long-term success.

On Wednesday morning, it was announced that the Pakistani military had taken control of Dagar, the capital of Buner district. Fighting remained heavy in the area, with 70 militants claimed killed and another 350 or so still holding out in parts of the district.

The operation in Buner was launched after Pakistani intelligence intercepted a telephone call between Pakistani Taliban leader Mawlana Fazlullah and one of his commanders indicating that their plan was to feign a withdrawal from Buner and then to launch a surprise takeover. The Tehrik-i Taliban-i Pakistan (TTP) stands accused of killing or kidnapping local NWFP security personnel and kidnapping adolescent boys from villages for induction into the TTP paramilitary.

High Obama administration officials appear to have worked themselves into a frenzy about events in Malakand, and propose dealing with it by giving Islamabad more money more quickly than planned and also training Pakistani troops in counter-insurgency. Some US officials suspect duplicity on the part of the government of Pakistani President Asaf Ali Zardari. I take it that means they think the Pakistani military is sanguine about the spread of Talibanism in Malakand because the Pakistani Taliban might be useful in projecting Pakistani influence in the southern Pushtun areas of Afghanistan, which Islamabad considers its "strategic depth."



One of the reasons for which the Pakistani government has been unwilling to conduct major military operations against the militants in Swat Valley and Buner may be the risk of massive population displacement, which in turn could be more destabilizing than a few Taliban. Even in the fighting in the past few days to push the Pakistani Taliban out of parts of Malakand, 30,000 civilians were displaced from their homes. Some 300,000 were displaced by the Bajaur campaign last fall and into winter 2009. And altogether the UNO is estimating that 600,000 are now displaced by fighting in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and the North-West Frontier Province (and are so destitute that they need food aid), and Pakistani authorities believe it may be as much as a million. There are only 3.5 million persons in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, and another say 17 million in the NWFP. My guess is that a good ten to fifteen percent of all the inhabitants of FATA are now internally displaced persons and many seem to be vulnerable.

The insecurity in the FATA areas is badly affecting the nearby capital of the North-West Frontier Province, Peshawar, which has seen militant attacks on its infrastructure and where the population now rushes home at nightfall.

The connection between the Pakistani Taliban advance in Malakand areas like Dir and the security of US troops fighting next door in the Kunar Province of Afghanistan is underlined by this CBS video:



Riz Khan covers the rise of the Pakistan Taliban in the North-West, noting that British PM Gordon Brown recently expressed anxiety that Pakistani Talibanism forms a threat to the security of London.



End/ (Not Continued)

4 Comments:

At 4:07 AM, Blogger Stephane MOT said...

Islamabad lost the hand when they allowed Taliban to implement shariah in the area. Backpedaling there is politically difficult, and solving the crisis militarily impossible.

From here, it looks as if sandwiching Talibans is bound to fail. They can never be caught between the rock (neither the US nor Afghans can control the border) and a hard place (PAK central gvt too soft, corrupt, or infiltrated).

The key is winning the hearts of the population, but they are already flocking out.

 
At 12:30 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

I hope you (and the other readers) are also looking at China Matters, http://chinamatters.blogspot.com/. The anonymous author is exceedingly well-informed about Pakistan as well as China.

 
At 2:50 PM, Blogger MonsieurGonzo said...

About three-quarters of supplies for NATO/American forces in Afghanistan, mainly food and fuel, are ferried via a singular supply route through western Pakistan. ref : “Gen. David H. Petraeus, the head of the U.S. Central Command, said [in January, 2009] during a visit to the region that "alternate routes outside Pakistan had been found," but he provided no details and gave no timetable for their use. The supply question has taken on added urgency with the planned deployment of up to 30,000 extra American troops in the Afghan theater in the next 18 months [as well as the increasing number of "Taliban" attacks on our obviously quite vulnerable singular, land-based line -of- supply].

 
At 7:09 AM, Blogger Richard Parker said...

Imagine 60,000 US troops holed up in Afghanistan without food, fuel or bullets?

It's an interesting thought - how many helicopters would be needed to rescue them all?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home