Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Saturday, August 30, 2008

OSC: Russia- Iran Alliance?

The USG Open Source Center translates an article from the Russian press proposing a strategic alliance between Russia and Iran.


Pundit on Possible Russia-Iran Alliance To Counter 'Unfriendly' US Moves
Article by Radzhab Safarov, General Director of the Russian Center for Iranian Studies: "Iranian Trump Card. Russia Can Take Control of Persian Gulf"
Vremya Novostey
Friday, August 29, 2008
Document Type: OSC Translated Text

The recognition of South Ossetia's and Abkhazia's independence by Russia is a timely step to protect these republics from new Georgian aggression. However, taking into account the United States' plans to expedite Georgia's and Ukraine's accession to the NATO military-political bloc, the situation near the Russian border remains alarming. At the same time Moscow has a lot of possibilities to take balanced counter measures to the United States' and entire NATO's unfriendly plans. In particular, Russia can rely on those countries that effectively oppose the United States' and their satellites' expansion. Only collective efforts can help to create a situation which would, if not eliminate then at least reduce the risk of the Cold War's transformation into local and global conflicts.

For instance, Moscow could strengthen its military-technical ties with Syria and launch negotiations on the reestablishment of its military presence in Cuba. However, the most serious step which the United States and especially Israel fear (incidentally, Israel supplied arms to Georgia) is hypothetical revision of Russia's foreign policy with regard to Iran. A strategic alliance presuming the signing of a new large-scale military political treaty with Iran could change the entire geopolitical picture of the contemporary world.

New allied relations may result in the deployment of at least two military bases in strategic regions of Iran. One military base could be deployed in the north of the country in the Iranian province of Eastern Azerbaijan and the other one in the south, on the Island of Qeshm in the Persian Gulf. Due to the base in Iran's Eastern Azerbaijan Russia would be able to monitor military activities in the Republic of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey and share this information with Iran.

The deployment of a military base on the Island of Qeshm would allow Russia to monitor the United States' and NATO's activities in the Persian Gulf zone, Iraq and other Arab states. With the help of special equipment Russia could effectively monitor whois sailing toward this sea bottleneck, from where, and with what cargo on board to enter the World Ocean or to return.

For the first time ever Russia will have a possibility to stop suspicious vessels and ships and inspect their cargo, which the Americans have been cynically doing in that zone for many decades. In exchange for the deployment of its military bases Russia could help the Iranians to deploy modern air defense and missile defense systems along the perimeter of its borders. Tehran, for instance, needs Russia's modern S-400 SAMs.

The Iranian leadership paid close attention to reports stating that the Georgian Government's secret resolution gave the United States and Israel a carte blanche to use Georgian territory and local military bases for delivering missile and bomb strikes against Iranian facilities in the event of need. Another neighbor, Turkey, is not only a NATO member, but also a powerful regional opponent and economic rival of Iran. In addition to this, the Republic of Azerbaijan has become the West's key partner on the issue of transportation of Caspian energy resources to world markets. The Iranians are also concerned at Baku's plans to give Western (above all American) capital access to the so-called Azerbaijani sector of the Caspian Sea, which is fraught with new conflicts, because the legal status of the Caspian Sea has not been defined to date.

Russia and Iran can also accelerate the process of setting up a cartel of leading gas producers, which journalists have already dubbed the "gas OPEC." Russia and Iran occupy first and second place in the world respectively in terms of natural gas reserves. They jointly possess more than 60 percent of the world's gas deposits. Therefore, even small coordination in the elaboration of a single pricing policy may force one-half of the world, at least virtually entire Europe, to moderate its ambitions and treat gas exporters in a friendlier manner.

While moving toward allied relations, Russia can develop cooperation with Iran in virtually all areas, including nuclear power engineering. Russia can earn tens of billions of dollars on the construction of nuclear power plants in Iran alone. Tehran can receive not only economic, but also political support from Russia in the development of its own atomic energy sector.

In addition to this,in view of the imminent breakup of the CIS from which Georgia already pulled out, Russia could accelerate the process of accepting Iran as an equal member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). By accepting Iran, one of the key countries of the Islamic world, the organization could change fundamentally both in terms of its potential and in terms of its regional role. Meanwhile, as an SCO member Iran will find itself under the collective umbrella of this organization, including under the protection of such nuclear states as Russia and China. This will lay foundations for a powerful Russia-Iran-China axis,which the United States and its allies fear so much.

(Description of Source: Moscow Vremya Novostey in Russian -- Liberal, small-circulation paper that sometimes criticizes the government)

16 Comments:

At 12:37 AM, Blogger Lana said...

It's said that NATO has 2 routes into Afghanistan, and one of them goes through Russia. According to the Asian Times (atimes.com), the Taliban and al qaeda have targeted the two major roads through Pakistan. And there have been reports in US papers about increasing destruction of NATO supplies.

You know this figures into things.

Although it's not the custom in the USA to connect dots, we should remember that all this accelerating foreign tension is happening while the financial system is unraveling. I imagine our political elites are very aware of this.

 
At 2:56 AM, Blogger Richard Parker said...

Oh dear oh dear. Juan's comment today shows just how the whole Terror War nonsense is falling apart.

Bush&Co had enough stupidity and hubris to let this happen.

Now USAmerica, when you crawl back into your shell, and let the rest of us do without your 'Liberty, Freedom & Democracy' crap, the world may improve a bit.

 
At 3:05 AM, Blogger karlof1 said...

Interesting suggestions from a "pundit" writing in a newspaper that "sometimes criticizes the government." (I wonder how Open Source would describe the Washington Post, New York Times, National Review, etc.?)

Iran would only allow another country to set up military bases in its territory under extreme duress--perhaps. Iran and Russia do not have really close relations, like those of allies; and Iran has very good historic reasons to mistrust Russia. The ongoing lack of completion of the Bushehr nuclear power station is a very big thorn in relations as is Iran's lack of rapid entry into the SCO. Plus, there is the question of monetary expense for out-of-country miltary establishments. Better to provide the Iranians with the tools and training.

The formation of a NatGas cartel is a very big possibility; but even that has limitations as the marketing and transport of NatGas is very different from oil and finished petroleum products. Further, the amounts of NatGas available for export while currently quite large will dwindle rather than expand over time and after a generation there will only be enough left to provide for internal consumption for perhaps another generation. Yes, by 2050 its most likely there will no longer be any overseas fossil fuel exports and very few made overland. So, if a cartel was organized, it would only function for 15-20 years.

Virtually no pundit takes into consideration the fact that exportable amounts of oil and NatGas will be exhasuted in 20-25 years at current usage rates. Is it worth the threat of global war--likely nuclear war--for resources that will last such a short time? I think it utter folly to the nth degree. The only person who's doing something about solving the question about future enrgy sources is T. Boone Pickens the oil now wind tycoon.

 
At 3:21 AM, Blogger eurofrank said...

Dear professor Cole

An important question to ask is whether the Russians or Chinese have the skills to increase output from Iranian Gas and Oil fields.

A recent Chatham house papaer drew a picture of internationaloil majors with skills excluded from nationalmarkets in favour of National Oil Companies which lack the skills and consequently prodcution declines.

 
At 3:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In this article, Safarov sounds like a Russian neo-con. While the scenario described is a remote possibility, there are many more likely ones too.

The current divisions of pro-US Arabs and anti-US Iran will soo be over. The US will almost certainly be downsized in the Gulf with other nations moving in. Not only Russia, but China and France too.

Tdemise of Iran's own neo-con and their stupid imperial dreams is a strong possibility. This will lead to healthy cooperation between Iran and its neighbors based on trade rather than force amking outside interference pointless.

Russia's grown-ups do not want a return to the Soviet's global reach with its disastorous end. Putin and others want a multi-polar world based on free-trade and growth.

The demise of the USA creates a classic vacuum which some want to fill in classic spheres of influence, but the world is a very different place now. Only the Americans seem to be strongly stuck in the past. But they no longer have the means to make their ideology-based confrontations work.

 
At 11:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Third route is from Iran to Afganistan.

India built a road from Zaranj-Deleram
with MOU from Iran. And ships all its aide to Afganistan from a port in Iran.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1080716/jsp/frontpage/story_9556171.jsp

http://www.hinduonnet.com/2003/01/26/stories/2003012604420800.htm

 
At 1:26 PM, Blogger karlof1 said...

I should ammend my comment to say that T.Boone Pickens is one of the few people in the US trying to erect new souces of electrical power supplies. As far as countries go, the Germans and Dutch have a big lead on everyone else, and the French are in good position, too. To understand the impact a NatGas cartel might have, here is a very informative item detailing the European gas market.

 
At 2:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Iran has a long history of pitting Russa off against the West to maintain its independance.

However, Russian military bases on its Persian Gulf Island is going way too far, though.

Iran did not create a revolution to throw out the criminal American only to hand the country over to the criminal Russians.

 
At 3:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is, military cooperation is one thing but foreign military bases on key Iranian Persian Gulf Islands would be unacceptable.

Iran does not want to become dependent on Russia but rather to pit the Russians and Westerners against each other.

 
At 7:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't fall for it eurofrank.

Scholarly or Sophistry? A take on Chatham house’s “Ethiopia and Eritrea: Allergic to Persuasion”

Perhaps some answers can be gleaned from the opinions of Arnold J. Toynbee, the former Director of Studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), a.ka, Chatham House.

I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands....” (Arnold J. Toynbee, Former Director of Studies, Royal Institute of International Affairs)

 
At 8:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Karof1 says: "The only person who's doing something about solving the question about future enrgy sources is T. Boone Pickens the oil now wind tycoon."

Actually, there is a second... Barack Obama.

 
At 9:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The chances of Iran agreeing to Russian military bases on its soil is nil.

Behnam

 
At 1:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is, military cooperation is one thing but foreign military bases on key Iranian Persian Gulf Islands would be unacceptable.

The chances of Iran agreeing to Russian military bases on its soil is nil.

I would agree with both comments. However, in order to train Iranian troops it's quite plausible that the Iranian government would permit sizable groups of Russian military or quasi-military engineers and technicians to reside within close proximity of newly delivered Russian air defence systems. Those personnel would serve as a substitute for an army corps or naval squadron. If Russian technicians were killed and injured during an attack on Iran the Russians would have a legitimate case for military action and retaliation launched from bases within Russia.

 
At 2:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like it wasn't such a good idea for NATO to support Georgia's surprise attack and mass murder of 2100 Ossetian civilians and 8 Russian peacekeepers.

I guess it's time to sit back and count the unintended consequences.

 
At 2:22 PM, Blogger omop said...

If 9/11 changed EVERYTHING in the US then it should be becoming quite obvious that 08/08/08 changed EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD.

Am always amazed and amused by the certitude of most commentators whose knowledge of the Middle East especially is gleaned principally and primarely from what the AEI, the NYT or the WSJ publishes.

The only safe and reasonable comment to make is that the US establishment better recognize that henceforth the world is not what it used to be pre 08/08/08.

All relationships and/or beliefs as to who is friend and who is foe are up in the air. And the time to start accepting the reality of such changes is now. So is the time to do some heavy thinking.

 
At 6:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I totally agree to Richards point. Macroanalytically there is no problem that can by solved by any war, except of keeping the war industrie alive in order to chase the compound interest and make money. Sad enough.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home