Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Passage of Electoral Provision Likely will Delay Elections

It is not looking good for the holding of provincial elections in Iraq this year.

First the high electoral commission warned that if enabling legislation was not passed by the end of July, it would push them back from October to Dec. 22.

Now, the contentious issue of the province of Kirkuk may have delayed them further. Kirkuk has Kurds, Arabs and Turkmen. The Kurds wish to annex it to their Kurdistan Regional Government, seeing its oil wealth as potentially key to an independent Kurdish state in the future. The annexation is opposed by Arabs and most Turkmen. It is also opposed by Turkey.

Sunni speaker of the house, Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, authorized a secret vote on what to do about Kirkuk Province (also called Tamim). S


Courtesy al-Zaman

ome had argued that Kirkuk should vote like any other province. But the parliamentarians voting on Tuesday, according to the LAT's Ned Parker, passed a "provision" that "called for a committee to be set up to review the problems in Kirkuk and take interim steps until local elections are scheduled, including apportioning power in the provincial government equally among Kurds, Arabs and Turkmens."

The secret ballot had been opposed by the Kurdish MPs, who staged a walk-out, along with some Shiite allies. When this provision was passed, they warned of blood in the streets in Kirkuk. (Actually, that development would not reflect well on the Kurds, since they would be turning to violence over a measure passed by a majority of the quorum in an elected parliament.)

It is widely expected that President Jalal Talabani with use his power of veto against the bill.

Al-Hayat writes in Arabic that the Kurdistan Alliance with 58 seats in parliament has been a key pillar of support for the al-Maliki government. Were the Kurds to be deeply angered, they could pull out of his de facto coalition, leaving him much weakened. The tiff with the Kurds comes only days after the Sunni Arab Iraqi Accord Front finally rejoined the government.

Kirkuk sees regular political violence. On Tuesday, McClatchy reports, "On Monday night, a roadside bomb targeted a police patrol in Kirkuk city. Two policemen were killed( including the deputy of Irouba police station Colonel Khabat Aziz) and 5 others were injured."

4 Comments:

At 7:33 AM, Blogger susanai said...

I just wanted to thank you for interesting writings. They are very thoughtfully set down. Thankyou again and good writings.

 
At 10:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Talabani has rejected the new election law as you expected, but the reason he has given is quite amusing:

"The president does not accept a law like this, a law that 127 deputies voted on and which does not represent even half of the parliament," a statement from Talabani's office said.

from:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080723/twl-iraq-vote-law-3cd7efd.html

The simple majority is required by the law of the land, but the gangster thinks he can change it on a whim, and he is only a symbolic figure in the Iraqi system anyway.

It is about time this anti-Iraq Iraqi President removed. A vote of no confidence is way overdue.

 
At 1:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

People ought to read Obama's latest statements on Israel here:
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2008/07/200872315256480899.html

 
At 7:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re Kurd walkout and Talibani veto of a "last chance this year' provincial election law.

The UK.news link from anonymous was informative. Thx.

Interesting that the intractable barriers to provincial elections are intra-shiite (keep the sadrists down) and arab-kurd. It has alway's seemed to me that Barzani's vision of Kurdistan was on a vector that branched away from the old Arab tormentors.

Kirkuk is the test case for Kurd expansion, and the non-Kurdish parts of its Tamin province are a wedge between Kurdish Arbil and Sulimaniyah. But Kurd hopes, plans, and claims of local majorities include parts of three other provinces.

The civil war in Mosul has been heavily driven by Kurd retribution/expansion, and the North Zone created by the US Army in 2003 seems to have favored the Kurd Militia that has been the mainstay of our local troops.

Here are some maps. There are better ones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Iraq_2003_occupation.png
http://icasualties.org/oif/ProvinceMap.aspx
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/Kurdish-inhabited_area_by_CIA_%281992%29.jpg

 

Post a Comment

<< Home