Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Iraqi Vice Premier Badly Wounded in Attack
Iranians Take British troops Captive


A Salafi Jihadi operative infiltrated the entourage of Iraqi Vice Premier Abdul Salam al-Zawba'i and detonated a belt bomb in his house on Friday, seriously injuring al-Zawba'i and hurting 17 other persons (some reports say it left 6 of his associates dead). Al-Zawba'i has been part of a recruitment effort to get Sunni Arab tribespeople to fight the Salafi Jihadis (fundamentalist radicals now referred to in the US press as "al-Qaeda," though in fact they have not pledged fealty to Usamah Bin Laden). Al-Sharq al-Awsat reports, however, that the assassin was in fact from al-Zawba'i's' tribe.

A vice premier is a high officer of state in Iraq, and this assassination attempt underlines that no one in that country is safe from the ongoing violence.

Iranian Revolutionary Guards took 15 British sailors captive on Friday, claiming that their skiffs had strayed into Iranian waters. There is speculation that the Iranian action is related to Saturday's expected vote at the United Nations Security Council on imposing sanctions on Iran because it declines to halt its uranium enrichment attempts.

Reuters reports political violence in Iraq on Friday, including the discovery of four bodies in Mosul and a bombing in East Baghdad (Sadr City) that left 7 dead and 20 wounded, according to al-Zaman.

Labels:

3 Comments:

At 3:12 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

RE: "There is speculation that the Iranian action is related to Saturday's expected vote.."

Huh? Don't you mean the US/UK action of boarding an Iranian ship is related to the expected vote? Let me explain how the military works: the Royal Marines boarded the Iranian ship on the unit commander's orders, who received his orders from the Captain of the HMS Cornwall, who takes orders from MNF-I and CentCom. The marines didn't willy-nilly decide on their own, "Hey! Let's board an Iranian ship today."

Good chance the Iranian cargo ship was stopped somewhere off the Iran-UAE coast or the Iran-Oman coast. It seems reasonable and prudent for the Captain of the Iranian cargo ship to radio the Iranian Navy as he is being boarded by armed marines of a foreign military. It is the responsibility of the Iranian Navy to come to the assistance of an Iranian merchant ship. And it is reasonable for the Iranian Navy to arrest armed marines who illegally boarded an Iranian ship. I would.

For the record, the Shatt al-Arab waterway isn't a "waterway that separates Iran from Iraq" it is a waterway that separates Iran from Kuwait, Arabia, UAE, and Oman (the Iraqi al-Faw penninsula is barely a sliver). Also for the record, Iran didn't take anybody 'hostage' as there are no ransom demands.

http://encarta.msn.com/map_701516482/Shatt_al_Arab.html

=========================

 
At 7:34 PM, Blogger IraqWatcher said...

Wrong on several counts:

Cornwall doesn’t ‘take orders’ from MNF-I, though it does (I believe) fall under CENTCOM via the naval Task Force.

The ship boarded wasn’t even Iranian.

The idea the incident took place near the Iranian-Omani coast is ridiculous – it’s miles away!

And you seem to be unable to tell the difference between the Shatt al-Arab and the Gulf.

 
At 9:22 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

RE: "For the record, the Shatt al-Arab..."

Sorry, was reading 'Shatt al-Arab' but thinking 'Persian Gulf'. Reportedly, the incident took place on or near the Shatt al-Arab river.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home