Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Thursday, February 15, 2007

5 US Troops Killed in Sunni Arab Areas
US Raids Office of SCIRI Leader Saghir


The US military is reporting the deaths of 6 US troops in Iraq. Four were killed by a roadside bomb in Sunni-majority Diyala Province where the US has been fighting Sunni Arab guerrillas. Another was killed "north of Baghdad" (i.e. Sunni territory). The sixth was a non-combat death. Despite the brouhaha about alleged Iranian support to Shiite militias, The five KIAs were all killed by Sunni Arabs who are hostile to Iran. This situation is the typical one in Iraq. So why isn't Bush talking about Sunni Arab insurgents instead of about Iran? (See Gareth Porter on this issue-- he shows that the recent US briefing demonstrated the opposite of what it was going for; also Best Guess.)

Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that Iraqi soldiers set up big concrete barriers around the city as part of the new security arrangements on Wednesday, causing traffic backups.

The same source says that US troops invaded the offices of Jalal al-Din Saghir, a cleric who preaches at the Buratha Mosque in northern Baghdad, and confiscated his private papers. Saghir said he believed that the Americans suspected him of being linked to Iran.

(This raid is further proof that the US is not worried about Iranian aid to the Mahdi Army, with which it has clashed, but rather to the Badr Corps, its putative ally. The Badr Corps paramilitary belongs to the Supreme Council for Islamic REvolution in Iraq, of which Saghir is a leader.)

Borzou Daragahi of the LA Times reports that Sadrist member of parliament Fattah Shaikh says he saw Muqtada al-Sadr in Najaf four days ago. The US military had reported that the Shiite nationalist cleric had left for Iran last month.

Al-Sharq al-Awsat reports in Arabic that a number of the leaders of the Sadr Movement and its paramilitary, the Mahdi Army, have relocated to Iran. Some say they are on pilgrimage to the shrine of the 8th Imam in Mashhad, eastern Iran. Others are in the Iranian seminary city of Qom or in Tehran. They appear to be lying low in this way during the security crackdown of the al-Maliki government and the US military, now underway. An eyewitness named al-Khafaji said that Mahdi Army militiamen abruptly vanished from the city squares of Najaf recently.

A source in the Iraqi Ministry of the Interior told SA that the US military has given the Ministry lists of Mahdi Army commanders considered to be guilty of murder or crimes of ethnic cleansing. Getting them off the streets is considered key to the new security plan. The names include both Sunnis and Shiites.

(But note that the Ministry of the Interior was for a long time under the control of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq and still has a big contingent from that party, so essentially the US is helping SCIRI remove its rivals among the Sadrists and Sunni Arabs.)

A British military transport plane appears to have been damaged by an explosive as it was landing in Maysan province. Its crew had to be rescued and the plane was destroyed. Maysan is a stronghold of the Mahdi Army of Muqtada al-Sadr.

Iraqis are using Google Earth to plot routes to work that avoid neighborhoods of the opposite sect of Islam, while guerrillas are using it to find their targets.

France broke up a ring of Sunni fundamentalist recruiters for volunteers to fight US forces in Iraq. Two of the French citizens were detained in Syria by the secular Baath Party. So, France and Syria just helped save the lives of US troops. If the US far right ever finds out about this, it should give them a huge ice cream headache.

Austrian rifles sold to Iran are showing up in the hands of Iraqi snipers. Iran is notorious for its black market arms smuggling (in which Ronald Reagan and Ollie North once got involved). I guess now Bush will have no option but to go to war with Austria. I hate to tell Arnie, this, but Washington has been known to intern foreign nationals in California of countries against whom we are at war . . .

Reuters reports political violence in Iraq on Wednesday:

Baghdad:


*Police found 5 bullet-ridden bodies in the street.

*Guerrillas deployed a car bomb to kill 4 and wound 10 near a hospital in the Christian Camp Sara district.

*Guerrillas in Bayaa used a car bomb to kill 2 and wound 7.

*Guerrillas fired mortar rounds at northern Rashidiya (north Baghdad), killing one and wounding 16.

*Guerrillas trying to hit a police patrol killed 1 and wounded 3 in al-Sulaikh, northern Baghdad.

*Guerrillas fought Iraqi army troops in the Yarmouk district, leaving 3 troops wounded. Also in Yarmouk, guerrillas deployed a roadside bomb, killing 1 civilian.



In Arab-Jubur, the US military used air strikes to kill 15 Iraqis it said were insurgents.

In Ramadi, a suicide car bomber killed 5 and wounded 20 when he detonated his payload at the entrance to a police station. They killed the head of the station.

In the northern city of Mosul, guerrillas used a car bomb to kill 3 and wound 20.

Militiamen killed a policeman in the southern Shiite city of Samawa, causing local authorities to impose a curfew.

McClatchy gives some more details, including that one target of the mortar strikes in Baghdad was a Shiite mosque.

KarbalaNews .net reports in Arabic that Ayatollah Muhammad Ya`qubi, the spiritual leader of the Fadila or Virtue Party, called in Najaf for Iraqis to use the occasion of the one-year anniversary of the blowing up of the Askariya Shrine in Samarra to come together to demonstrate their unity as Iraqis. He spoke against sectarian violence.

Congressman John Murtha will partner with MoveOn.org to in broadcasting a message opposing Bush's escalation of the US troop presence in Iraq.

Cable television 24 hours "news" channels in the US thought the death of Anna Nicole Smith more important than Iraq or other world news last week, devoting 15 percent of their air time to the story.

Labels:

6 Comments:

At 10:27 AM, Blogger John Koch said...

We would get more accurate information on Muqtada whereabouts if National Enguirer or the People Magazine paparazzi picked up on his trail. First, however, there would have to be a garrish scandal tidbit to convince publishers that audiences really give a hoot. Could he have been the father of Anna Nicole's child? Ah, that would spark checkout counter sales! Honestly, public awareness of the war will always be marginal unless it reaches the popular psyche in some way that does not prompt quick tune out. Maybe Murtha and Kucinich could learn from Paris Hilton and Britney.

Honestly, the US is merely trying to disgrace Moqtada or to make him declare his location to allow for target calibration. Authorities might hope he goes ape, gives a public sermon, and invites martyrdom. But perhaps his faith is not that strong. He, too, has "other priorities."

 
At 4:26 PM, Blogger Kevin Farron said...

To the Editor:

After reading John Koch’s comment, I cannot help but think about America’s obsession with celebrities. He’s right, if Moqtada was found to be Anna Nicole’s father, the general public would probably learn who he is. Koch’s opinion on public awareness of the war is also granted; happenings in the Middle East will stay unimportant until they are dumbed down and scandalized.

My idea, why not create a celebrity in Iraq? How about an Iraqi Idol? Find someone with talent and good looks and glorify them. Write, or even fabricate, emotional, personalized, easily read, story after story, scandal after scandal. Hire Janet Cooke for all I care. Create the frenzy that exists at home for hundreds of celebrities for just one Iraqi. The war relevant stories will come with little time; the friends killed, the parents out of work, no electricity, no clean water. We need the attention of the public first before they will begin to pay attention, even if it takes a little fabrication. It is not like we have never been lied to in the past.

Kevin Farron
1114 Jefferson Ave
Traverse City, MI
49684
231-499-8471

 
At 5:24 PM, Blogger Christiane said...

The spin concerning Iran seems to continue. Now a British spokesman report that the UK forces have surrounded Basra and closed the South border between Iran/Iraq. Read more here.
Extract :

The spokeswoman said the aim was "to halt smuggling and contain criminal and rogue militia operations".
She added two nearby border crossings had been closed for 72 hours, after instructions from the Iraqi government.
Sadr and key figures from his Mehdi Army, which has been identified by the US military as one of the key threats to law and order in Baghdad, have reportedly already crossed the frontier.
The operation began early today and involved British troops, Iraqi police and the Department of Border Enforcement, the BBC added.
It will continue for three days.

(Well, this is reported by a Kuwaiti newspaper).

By the way, the Independent has a great analysis of the source of power of Muqtada Al'Sadr.

 
At 7:52 PM, Blogger Da' Buffalo Amongst Wolves said...

Vindication!

I elaborated a few days back about an ancedotal Doug Feith's quip that it (the Iraq invasion) would be over in a matter of weeks, not to worry. I commented that it wasn't some crack fantasy... it sounded like they had people inside Saddam Hussein's baathist regime, not just in the early 60s as has been documented as "penetrated", but just before we invaded Iraq as well.

Professor Cole's ancedote re-iterated:

Speaking of scams, Neoconservative Douglas Feith is teaching at Georgetown. So in the run up to the 2003 war, I'm told, Douglas Feith was challenged by a State Department official who knows the Middle East about what in the world the US would do in Iraq once it won the war.

State Dept. Official: "Doug, after the smoke clears, what is the plan?"

Feith: "Think of Iraq as being like a computer. And think of Saddam as like a processor. We just take out the old processor, and put in a new one--Chalabi."

State Dept. Official: "Put in a new processor?"

Feith: "Yes! It will all be over in 6 weeks."

State Dept. Official: "You mean six months."

Feith: "No, six weeks. You'll see."

State Dept. Official: "Doug."

Feith: "Yes?"

State Dept. Official: "You're smoking crack, Doug."

Feith: "Oh, so you're disloyal to the President, are you?"

[Source]


This just showed up @ the National Security Archive, Georgetown University:

National Security Archive Update, February 14, 2007

TOP SECRET POLO STEP
Iraq War Plan Assumed Only 5,000 U.S. Troops Still There by December 2006

CentCom PowerPoint Slides Briefed to White House and Rumsfeld in 2002, Obtained by National Security Archive through Freedom of Information Act

PowerPoints Reflect Internal Debates Over Size and Timing of Invasion Force

For more information contact:
Thomas Blanton/Joyce Battle - 202/XXX-XXXX

http://www.nsarchive.org

[...]
"First, they assumed that a provisional government would be in place by 'D-Day', then that the Iraqis would stay in their garrisons and be reliable partners, and finally that the post-hostilities phase would be a matter of mere 'months'. "
[...]
.
.

It wasn't the battle plans, tactics, and strategy that fell apart on them, the WHOLE DANG THING fell apart on them because they were deluded enought to think that a 'herd of Chalabis' could just... take... over... and run the show.

 
At 8:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ramzy Baroud, today: "Palestinians can never, under any circumstances and no matter how great concessions are, meet Israeli expectations, for these expectations are crafted in so clever a way that makes it practically impossible for any Palestinian leader or government to comply. Neither late President Yasser Arafat, who wore an Israeli flag pin side by side with a Palestinian one on his Khaki jacket managed to live up to Israel’s seemingly ‘reasonable’ demands, nor did his successor, Mahmoud Abbas, who was ironically elevated in his political relevance to become the darling of Israel and Washington when Hamas swept the majority of the vote in the legislative elections of January 2006, which subsequently led to the devastating sanctions. The Israeli government labeled Abbas ‘weak’ and ‘indecisive’. He too, by the same standards, was not able to meet Israel’s conditions, why should we expect Hamas or any other to do so?"

"The practical Israeli position -- as opposed to rhetorical - is rather clear and should not involve any exaggerated analysis: let Palestinians continue to be collectively punished, succumb to internal feuds and dwell in their limitless misery to allow Israel the needed time to further consolidate its territorial schemes in the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem: locking up more Palestinian communities in Bantustan-like localities, while Jewish settlements continue to be conveniently linked up to so-called 'Israel proper' using the pretext of security and the mammoth and encroaching imprisonment wall as the means to such an end."

http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story-021507125907.htm

Co-operation with their occupier will not help the Palestinians achieve independence, and Palestinian violence only seems to justify their occupation. But active, peaceful resistance would free this long-suffering nation. For example, rotating one-month hunger strikes by tens of thousands of Palestinians, and a national renunciation of violence and refusal to co-operate with Israel, would free Palestine by the end of this year.

crawfordcandiru.blogspot.com

 
At 5:04 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

"Austrian rifles sold to Iran are showing up in the hands of Iraqi snipers. Iran is notorious for its black market arms smuggling [...]"

the sale of the rifles from Austria to Iran made headlines when it was cleared. The link to Austria is rather convenient, because it links in turn to official Iran.

where is the evidence?

it seems to me that all articles track back to the daily telegraph story by Thomas Harding
"Iraqi insurgents using Austrian rifles from Iran"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/13/wiran13.xml

or rather unspecified "US defense sources" speaking through him.

We neither have evidence that the rifles are from austria (steyr says that the patent is expired so there are knockoffs around, that they only actually sold 100 rifles - more than 100 have allegedly turned up -, and that they have not been contacted to compare serial numbers - context I have so far only seen given in the Austrian press)

Nor have we any evidence that such rifles were found at all, other than taking Thomas Harding's sources word for it.

Fortunately, Harding's journalistic integrity and grasp of international law and ethics
are stellar:

"There is now a growing mountain of evidence to go alongside the rhetoric which perhaps gives America a greater excuse to attack Iran than it did to attack Iraq in 2003"

Thomas Harding, transcribed from the audio accompanying the article
http://podcast.telegraph.co.uk/130207hardingguns.mp3

I know that greedy weapon traders and corrupt Iranian police all sound eminently plausible; however, this is from "the folks who brough you Iraq" ...

and, strictly speaking, all parties presumed innocent until at least some evidence is presented

regards
andreas

 

Post a Comment

<< Home