Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Cole Interview on CNN Monday

Cole on CNN.

YOUR WORLD TODAY Aired January 29, 2007 - 12:00 ET

JIM CLANCY, CNN INTERNATIONAL ANCHOR: Now, from the raging battle outside Iraq, to the political posturing by Washington and Tehran, what's really at stake? Earlier, we spoke with Juan Cole, professor of modern Middle East history at the University of Michigan, first asking him about that cult that was allegedly aiming to reshape religious and political history.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JUAN COLE, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: The Iranians are coming into Iraq for development aid. They've pledged a billion dollars, there are going to be joint refineries. And the U.S. announcement that it would kill or capture anyone that it thought was an intelligence agent has the potential for roiling relationships between the two.

CLANCY: Now, the U.S., Washington, clearly upset with Iran's nuclear program, but it's important to remember here there's a complete difference between Iran and other countries in the Middle East, and that's say it's not only because it's Shia, and these are Iranians and the other countries are Arabs. It's because if you go to the street in Iran, you will find people that are very supportive of Americans, want good relationships, while leadership is very anti- American.

This is the opposite what you find in other Arab countries. How important is it for Washington to take that into account as they go ahead with what appears to be confrontational policy?

COLE: Well, the Iranian public is very pro-American, and it's one of the few publics in the Middle East, I think, that would reform, if it could, in a way that was friendly to U.S. interests. If the United States goes into a frontal confrontation with Iran, however, it will push the Iranian public away. The Iranians are very nationalistic and they don't want to be dominated by the U.S.

CLANCY: Let's go back and focus though on the situation in Iraq. This short-term troop increase appears to be a last-ditch effort to improve security in the country.

What chance does this mission have and the overall mission in Iraq?

COLE: Well, I think it's very difficult for the United States to establish security in Iraq now. We simply don't have enough troops to do proper counterinsurgency. And the country really is now mobilized politically.

As we have just seen, you know, the Shiite south was considered to be relatively calm. Then out of nowhere you get this millenarian movement that thinks the promised one of Islam is about to come, and invades Najaf, so the country is really in a great deal of chaos. And securing a few neighbors in Baghdad just isn't going to do it.

CLANCY: What would do it? Will anything do it? Does anyone have an answer?

COLE: Well, I think the big Iraqi political leaders, who are usually communal leaders as well, need craft a national pact, a compromise that they can all live with and convince each other to put away their arms. This is the kind of thing that ended the Lebanese civil war in 1989. That's the only thing really that would work in Iraq.

CLANCY: We don't see much leadership there in Baghdad. Often the elected leaders wait until someone form outside the country comes in with these ideas.

Does Iraq have a leadership problem?

COLE: Well, there are big communal leaders -- Abdul Aziz al- Hakim of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the Kurdish leaders. The problem is that they're not willing to compromise with one other.

They're pushing for their maximum goals. And I think the U.S. could do the most good by just knocking some heads together and getting them to compromise.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

CLANCY: Some advice there for Washington coming from Juan Cole, a professor of modern Middle East history at the University of Michigan.

5 Comments:

At 11:29 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

The subject is guesome, but this interview is really good news!

 
At 11:58 PM, Blogger Chris said...

The only heads the U.S. has any business knocking together are American (and perhaps British).

 
At 2:49 AM, Blogger karlof1 said...

From the pressure CNN puts its interviewees under and the games it plays with them (for an example, see Gail Dines' article here http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0119-21.htm), I can understand how it's likely your "voice" is quite different from your blog, articles and books. At least, that's my impression from the transcript.

I agree with Peter McLennan; the war was lost from the outset by its fundamental illegality, and the only chance Cheney et al had of victory for their true goals was to vastly accelerate the policy of slow genocide undertaken by Clinton/Gore and then continue with the roll-up of Syria and afterwards Iran. But since they swallowed their propaganda whole and as there were quite clearly no WMDs, they lost any credibility they had with the professional military commanders and combat troops, lost the initiative and without it started being engulfed by the quicksand of Iraqi national resistence. As their fellow neocons have said, they weren't ruthless enough. I know it's grotesque, but that's the plain truth of the matter based on the plans laid out in their documents, which are no different from Hitler's Mein Kampf.

What we need now is ruthlessness from Democrats and those Republicans with morals to cut funding and end for all time the attempt at US "Full Spectrum Dominance" of the planet and its peoples, while ensuring the war criminals are prosecuted.

 
At 4:04 AM, Blogger Christiane said...

The US should just stop medling in Iraq and let the Iraqi negotiate a compromise. As long as the US troops and counselors ar in Iraq, they will only cause greater chaos.

The best placed leaders to negotiate a compromise is Muktada Al'Sadr. His nationalism, his will to keep Iraq together makes it a potential broker between all groups; in particular, he seems to be the only political group able to reach out to the Sunnis fighters and supporters. But given his position concerning a time table for a rapid US withdrawal it's of course not the choice of the US who are trying to smear him by all means.

This stubborn politic of the US will cause a shameful retreat, like the one from Vietnam. US will survive it, but it will also be the end of US superpower in the world. Guess what, many nations have survived it too, like Spain, France and the UK.

 
At 11:37 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Professor,

The CSM article said that you were skeptical of the economic/political origins of millenarianism. I'm curious to get more details about that throw-away line in the article, as such religious revolts are something I enjoy learning about (and may study further in the future.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home