Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Negroponte, Lebanon and al-Qaeda

US intelligence chief John Negroponte says he is worried about al-Qaeda getting a foothold in Lebanon. Reuters quotes him as saying,


' "He [Ayman al-Zawahiri] talked about the priority attached to being successful in Iraq so it could then be used as a platform to extend their activities into the Levant, meaning Jordan, Syria and Lebanon," Negroponte told Reuters and the International Herald Tribune in an interview on Friday.

"It's not clear to me whether or not they've got a basis for successful activity in Lebanon, since the stronger Muslim sect in Lebanon is Shia. But I wouldn't rule that out. And there's been some evidence of al Qaeda activity in Lebanon . . . " '


Radical Salafi Jihadis are rare in Lebanon, where the Sunni population is probably about 20 percent of the 3.8 million population (i.e. 760,000 persons). Ziad Jarrah, one of the 19 hijackers on Sept. 11, was Lebanese. There have been a handful of religious radicals among the Palestinians in the camps, one of whom appears to have assassinated former Prime Minister Rafiq al-Hariri after having fought the Americans in Iraq. Sunnis who attacked the Danish embassy in Beirut over the caricatures of the Prophet may have included some Salafi Jihadis, though that was probably a relatively spontaneous act of an urban crowd.

But for the most part, Sunnis in Lebanon are urban and urbane, have nearly universal literacy, and many are professionals. (Prime Minister Fuad Siniora is an example of that community.) Also, there aren't actually very many of them, maybe half a million adults, and they are in a political system dominated in different ways by Christians and Shiites.

How would you avoid the radicalization of the Lebanese Sunnis, if that was really a high priority?

Uh, like, don't let the Israelis bomb the country intensively for over a month, destroying its infrastructure and setting back its economy twenty years. And don't openly block a ceasefire if you are America.

Just a guess, that kind of thing could make people angry and unemployed and more easily recruited into al-Qaeda.

Getting out of Iraq and halting the assaults on Sunni Arabs there would help. Lebanese Sunnis tend to empathize with Iraqi Sunnis, and operations like Fallujah angered them.

Then, settling the Palestinian-Israeli conflict on terms that are just to the Palestinians would also be important in halting radicalization.

I don't see any sign whatsoever that the Bush administration is practically committed to acting in ways that forestall the radicalization of the Levant. This is a political question, and the politics of it are not being done right.

2 Comments:

At 12:06 PM, Blogger karlof1 said...

"I don't see any sign whatsoever that the Bush administration is practically committed to acting in ways that forestall the radicalization of the Levant."

It's my impression that they WANT to radicalize the region and thus maintain the enemy they've engineered so they can have endless rationales for our presence in the ME. Remember, it's now "extremism" and "extremists" our neverending war is supposedly against. Of course, it just happens to be convenient that the extremeists we're cultivating are in the same regions as oil.

 
At 11:56 PM, Blogger Jim Cowan said...

It struck me upon reading of the near inevitability of a nuclear strike on Iran that the US administration is counting on Russia as being eminently more civilised than is the US.
No longer a Super-Power Russia nevertheless has an imposing arsenal of nuclear weapons.The US by attacking a Russian ally is taking a chance that Russia will see the world-wide implications of entering a nuclear war and will hold off.
Russia then is morally superior to the US and the US will take full advantage. China will just wait for the US to eventually disappear up its own "ass"".

 

Post a Comment

<< Home