Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Over 100 Killed in Iraq, 100 Wounded
Mahdi Army Clashes in Diwaniyah
Bombings Rock Turkey


Two more US troops were announced dead on Monday, bringing the total dead among GIs for the weekend to 9.

Vice President Richard Bruce Cheney doesn't get it, as usual. The reason to draw down US ground troops in Iraq is that for the most part their presence in such numbers is counter-productive. Look at the fighting in Diwaniyah. All the US did was send helicopters to circle around. We don't need US or Coalition troops in Diwaniyah. And, why would we care who controls Diwaniyah, anyway? What Americans had even heard of it four years ago? It certainly is not a security threat to the United States.

As for this tag line that the the US was not in Iraq on Sept. 11, so Iraq cannot be generating terror, how stupid does he think we are? September 11 came indirectly out of the Reagan administration's use of Muslim fascists or mujahidin to fight socialism in Afghanistan. The lesson to draw is that unleashing large numbers of unconventional guerrilla forces and giving them billions of dollars and CIA training is a bad idea, and might well produce blowback. Afghanistan generated the last wave of terror. Now Iraq is generating a new generation of terror. Madrid and London came in response to it. Cheney's tag line is misleading and foolish.

The Independent estimates that over 100 Iraqis were killed on Monday in political violence. Dozens died in the fighting in Diwaniyah, along with the other violent deaths reported by Reuters, and the 14 dead bodies that showed up in Baghdad according to the LA Times. Al-Hayat estimated that 100 were wounded, as well.

Guerrillas also targeted the Ministry of the Interior with a car bomb, killing at least 16 and perhaps as many as 26 (-al-Hayat) and wounding dozens. The attack was likely an attempt to kill Interior Minister Jawad al-Bulani, who was to meet with provincial police chiefs on Monday.

Diwaniyah is run politically by the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, and likely its police and security forces have been heavily infiltrated by the Iran-trained Badr Corps, the paramilitary of SCIRI (as the NYT also suggests.) So a lot of the struggle is probably actually best thought of as Mahdi Army on Badr Corps faction fighting. Although SCIRI and allies won the provincial elections of January, 2005, since then the Sadr movement has been gaining adherents and influence in this and other southern Shiite provinces. New provincial elections were scheduled but have never been held, in part for fear that the Sadrists would sweep to power in provincial statehouses.

The Associated Press explains how the fighting in Diwaniyah began on Saturday, with Shiite militia attacks on Polish troops in the area. AP says that the Mahdi Army controlled wide swathes of the city on Monday evening.


' The clashes in Diwaniyah began Saturday night after a rocket attack on a Polish-run base earlier in the day, and then resumed Sunday night, said Lt. Col. Dariusz Kacperczyk, a Polish military spokesman.

Sheikh Abdul-Razaq al-Nidawi, the manager of Sadr's office in Diwaniyah, told the Associated Press that trouble had been brewing since Saturday night when the army arrested an Sadr supporter from the Jumhouri neighborhood.

On Sunday, the army raided the same place and "a gunfight erupted between them and the Mahdi Army," Nidawi said.

Army Capt. Fatik Aied said gunbattles broke out at about 11 p.m. Sunday south of Diwaniyah, when Iraqi soldiers conducted raids in three neighborhoods to flush out militiamen and seize weapons.

Nidawi said "a big force of the army raided Jumhouri, Sadr and Askouri neighborhoods and clashes broke out (again) between the army and the Mahdi Army." He said the raids took place early Monday. '


Al-Zaman reports that for the past three days, Diwaniyah had turned into an arena for street battles. On Monday, 20 Iraqi soldiers were killed and 50 Mahdi Army militiamen (followers of Shiite nationalist cleric Muqtada al-Sadr), and 70 persons were wounded. The battles evolved quickly after Iraqi security forces imprisoned an official of the Sadr Movement. The government and the Mahdi Army have concluded an unofficial truce. An Iraqi government spokesman said that 20 Iraqi troops and 40 Mahdi Army militiamen were killed in clashes that began Sunday night in Diwaniyah.

A captain who asked to remain anonymous told al-Zaman, "The clashes broke out after the Coalition forces incarcerated a prominent leader of the Sadr movement, who had in his possession quanities of medium weapons and bombs, and was linked to Saturday's assassinations after an attack in the Jumhuri District [downtown Diwaniyah]." The captain said that on Sunday, negotiations took place between the Coalition forces and the Sadr Movement concerning the release of the Sadrist leader, but they failed. That is what led to the clashes between the Mahdi Army and Iraqi security forces." He added, that a number of Mahdi militiamen came to the province from neighboring ones, to participate in the battle.

[The "Coalition" forces were apparently the Poles.]

Sahib al-Amiri, the head of a Sadrist foundation in Najaf, denied that the Mahdi Army had been involved in the fighting, though he said that they played a role in ending it. He maintained that it was others, outside Sadr's circle, who were responsible for the violence. He accused American military forces of "supporting these sorts of actions, for the purpose of extending the period of their presence in Iraq."

Prime Minister Nuri al-Malki had pledged on Aug. 17 that Qadisiyah province, of which Diwaniyah is the capital, would soon witness a handover from Coalition to Iraqi troops such as has already happened in Muthanna.

The governor of Qadisiyah, Khalil Jalil Hamzah, left for Najaf to negotiate with Muqtada al-Sadr after talks with his representatives in Diwaniyah failed.

A security source in Diwaniyah told al-Zaman, "Large numbers of reinforcements from the Iraqi army arrived at the city, and they secured most of its districts aside from the districts of al-Nahdah and that of al-Wahdah, where the militia remains dominant."

An Iraqi government source alleged to al-Zaman that "The Mahdi Army executed a number of Iraqi troops after having captured them." He added that the militia controlled 7 of the city's districts,a nd that they were establishing barricades and checkpoints, and were setting roadside bombs.

Abdul Mun'im Abu Tabikh, a member of Qadisiyah's elected governing council, alleged, "What happened was an attempt by the government to finish off undisciplined elements that are attempting to undermine security in the city and to continue to carry arms openly, on the part of some disreputable members of the Sadr Movement who refused to acknowledge the commands of Sayyid Muqtada al-Sadr to turn their energies toward preaching and guidance alone." This behavior led the government, he said to send in the army against them, especially those that were openly carrying arms. He said that there is a curfew in the city, given that the clashes are continuing.

Eyewitnesses reported an exodus from the city of dozens of families, who took refuge in surrounding villages. Shops are closed througout Qadisiyah, and both water and electricity have been cut off since Sunday evening.

The explosion at a leaking oil pipeline near Diwaniyah that killed 16 persons who came to collect petroleum from it would have been bad news enough all on its own. Instead, a mere deadly accident flew under the news radar. The tragedy came because of the severe fuel crisis in Iraq, which drives people to try to collect oil in dangerous ways.

Meanwhile, bombings rocked Turkey on Monday. A radical Kurdish group claimed credit, indicating it was trying to sabotage one of Turkey's major industry's, tourism.

The bombings are encouraging Turkey to step up its shelling of northern Iraq, where US-backed Kurdish politicians are harboring the terrorist PKK or Kurdish Workers' Party.

Bombings stretched from Istanbul to southern Iraq on Monday, in a new arc of crisis. This isn't going very well.

6 Comments:

At 4:14 PM, Blogger Jaraparilla said...

Juan,

Bravo for citing the Reagan administration's role in creating today's Islamic fundamentalist terrorists.

But I am disappointed to see you adopting the term "fascists" to describe such people. This is an old Karl Rove talking point: anyone who criticizes or opposes Bush is a "Fascist". Once again, it's a case of turning your greatest weakness into an attack: the real Fascists are in Washington.

 
At 8:00 PM, Blogger John Koch said...

Regarding Cheney, a well-intentioned politician, of either US party, "Ok. But if he's wrong, please give me an alternative position I can defend to the voters and not bring even worse disgrace and violence."

In other words, if the only solution is to leave Iraq, please indicate how.

 
At 8:36 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

I have long maintained that the only realistic long-term allies for the US in Iraq are the Kurds... The CIA has been working to rebuild ties with the Kurdish groups ever since the bloody letdown in 1991, when Bush Sr. refused to back up his promise of aiding a Kurdish revolt against Saddam... That, of course, is not the first time the Kurds have been let down by the US...

In the 1950s the Kurds were put in touch with Israel by the CIA and were encouraged to make trouble for Saddam in the post-1973 war era in order to weaken Iraq’s ability to aid an isolated Syrian regime… But the Kurds were stabbed in the back by Kissinger's Iran-Iraq initiative that allowed for an accord between the Shah and Saddam, freeing up Iraq to slaughter the Kurds in 1975...

Anyway, the only real threat to American ties with the Kurds is the question of Turkey's response to Kurdish militia activity... If the Turks continue to bomb Kurdish bases in Iraq, the US will soon be forced to determine which friend it wants to keep over the other.

 
At 8:59 PM, Blogger Jaraparilla said...

"Fascism" is a sorely abused word. When parents ground their teenage kids, they are called Fascists. The shop-owner who won't sell cigarettes to minors is called a Fascist. Rumsfeld is taking the nonsense even further, talking about a “New Type Of Fascism”.

So what is "Fascism" really?

There is absolutely NO reasonable definition of the word "Fascism" - a right-wing authoritarian doctrine characterized by militant nationalism and control of government by business interests - that can logically be applied to Al Quaeda, the insurgents in Iraq, or any other Bush opponents.

As Franklin Delano Roosevelt said to Congress in 1938:

The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling power. Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.

Roosevelt fought the Nazis in WWII. He knew a thing or two about Fascism.

And let's not forget that Prescott Bush, W's grandfather, was on the Fascist side, along with a whole host of US millionaires who had invested heavily in post-WWI Germany and who strongly opposed US intervention in WWII because they placed profiteering ahead of morality (and still do).

The stark, screaming, totally unpalatable truth is that BUSH & CO ARE THE FASCISTS!!!

And as Brendan O'Neill at antiwar.com points out, Today's 'Islamic Fascists' Were Yesterday's Friends.

 
At 12:26 AM, Blogger Jaraparilla said...

The the White House and the State Department are ignoring BBC requests for clarification of the term "Islamofascist".

US Muslim leaders say the term "offends the vast majority of moderate Muslims", "casts a shadow upon Islam" and "bolsters the argument that there is a clash of civilisations between Islam and the West".

Daniel Benjamin of the Center for Strategic and International Studies says, "There is no sense in which jihadists embrace fascist ideology as it was developed by Mussolini or anyone else who was associated with the term. This is an epithet, a way of arousing strong emotion and tarnishing one's opponent, but it doesn't tell us anything about the content of their beliefs.".

Zeinab Chami, a Muslim community activist in Dearborn, Michigan, says the administration has seized upon a new term to frighten people.

"I think the word terrorism has lost its edge. They are looking for something with a little more oomph."

Via the BBC.

 
At 1:06 AM, Blogger James-Speaks said...

Richard Bruce Cheney, unfortunately, thinks we are very stupid and he is willing to demonize anyone with a brain.

"WASHINGTON/RENO, Nevada (Reuters) - Vice President Dick Cheney, seizing on Democratic calls to pull troops out of Iraq, on Monday linked early withdrawal to the possibility of terrorist attacks in the United States."

Uh, if you don 't vote for Katherine Harris, there might be terror attacks. Uh, if you don't vote for Joe Lieberman, there might be terror attacks. Grrrr grrr. Uh, if you insist on knowing who sat in on the energy meetings, there might be terror attacks. If you don't pass retroactive laws protecting us for our unlawful prisons, there might be terror attacks.

Yup, pretty damned stupid, he thinks we are.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home