Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, July 30, 2006

The Qana Massacre, Part II

Israeli war planes scored a direct hit on a building in the Shiite village of Qana where destitute farming folk, including old people, women and children, had taken refuge in the basement from Israeli bombing raids. At least 60 are dead, as bodies are pulled from the rubble. 19 children are confirmed dead and another 11 are thought still to be in the basement. The Israelis say they had pamphleted the region demanding that all civilians leave, and high Israeli officials have openly said that anyone who remains is fair game (low civilianity index, and maybe low humanianity index, too). The Israelis don't say, however, how desperately poor hardscrabble farmers including the aged and infirm and children are supposed to travel to Beirut over the roads and bridges that the Israelis have bombed out, and on what they are supposed to live when they get there.

The Israelis had launched 80 air raids on the village of Qana overnight, with large numbers of buildings flattened, according to CNN.

The Israelis appear to be engaged in a concerted campaign of ethnic cleansing in the Shiite towns and villages of southern Lebanon, and are indiscriminately bombing all buildings in the area south of the Litani River. They have chased hundreds of thousands of residents out, and are destroying the property they left behind in a systematic way, rather as they destroy the houses belonging to the family members related to suicide bombers. In other words, the Israelis are engaged in collective punishment on a vast scale. They maintain that rocket launching sites are embedded in these villages. But since Hizbullah keeps firing large numbers of rockets, it does not actually appear to be the case that the Israelis are hitting the rocket launchers. They are demonstrably hitting civilian houses and apartment buildings in a methodical way. There is no independent evidence that this civilian building in Qana was used for any military purpose. Prime Minister Fouad Siniora has called for an international investigation and an immediate ceasefire, and he summarily sent Condi Rice away until she brings such a proposal.

Thousands of Lebanese in Beirut demonstrated in response and invaded the UN HQ in the capital. They also chanted against the United States ambassador in Lebanon, Jeffrey Feltman, screaming "Feltman out now!"

Feltman seems to be trapped in the US embassy, away from which most embassy employees have already been sent abroad. He expressed his regret to the Lebanese government for not being able to come to Baabda.

The Israelis bombed the Beirut-Damascus highway again on Saturday, adding to the crippling of Lebanon's infrastructure. Damascus is Beirut's inland trading partner and Lebanese trying to get out of the country have to go that route.

Mark Perry analyzes the decision-making that led to Qana.

Hamid Mir in Beirut finds that even some Christian nightclub owners are supporting Hizbullah! Opinion polls show Christian support for Hizbullah's resistance to the Israelis to have risen to over 50 percent in recent days, from the mid-40s.

Question 1: In what way is the Israeli compaign in South Lebanon different from Slobodon Milosevic's campaign in Bosnia?

Question 2: Since Bush and Rice derailed any move toward a ceasefire of the sort that the entire rest of the world demanded, aren't they directly implicated in this bloodshed?

AP reports on what the moral response would be of a normal human being in high political office:


' French President Jacques Chirac's office said "France condemns this unjustifiable action, which shows more than ever the need to move toward an immediate cease-fire, without which other such dramas can only be repeated."

Jordan's King Abdullah II condemned "the ugly crime perpetrated by Israeli forces in Qana," calling it "a blatant violation of the law and all international conventions."'


Later in the day, Pope Benedict XVI called for an immediate ceasefire.

I repeat, the Pope has called for an immediate ceasefire.

We know what we can expect from W.

Issandr El Amrani links to pictures of the Qana massacre and reminds us of the massacre of ten years ago.

Tom Engelhardt on the barbarity of air war.

Brent Scowcroft argues for a comprehensive settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Since the Arab League made such an offer to Israel way back in 2002, I'd say the ball is in Olmert's court. Good luck.

The Crisis Group has also put up a comprehensive peace plan.

Between 2000, when the Israelis withdrew unilaterally from their illegal military occupation of Lebanon's south, through July 12, 2006, six Israeli civilians died in border violence.

Israel's attack on fuel stations at the Christian port of Jounieh and elsewhere have caused massive oil spills on Lebanese beaches, perhaps the biggest environmental disaster ever in the Mediterranean.

14 Comments:

At 1:39 PM, Blogger eurofrank said...

Dear Professor Cole

Just for the record the BBC reports that Mr Blair has broken his silence at 18.15 BST.

He has said the situation in Lebanon cannot continue.

He has made phone calls and hopes that a Security Council resolution will bring the fighting to an end.

 
At 1:52 PM, Blogger Cori said...

Terrible. Just terrible.

However, in answer to your questions:

1) No rape camps. No door-to-door ethnic cleansing.

2) Yes, they are directly implicated. Especially since Bush expedited the delivery for the next shipment of military equipment to Israel. Of course, the Republicans AND Democrats in Congress are as well, since as of a couple of days ago, they wholeheartedly lent their support to Israel's actions.

Sigh.

 
At 2:17 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

In what way is the Israeli compaign in South Lebanon different from Slobodon Milosevic's campaign in Bosnia?

The difference is huge! Lebanon never was Israeli territory, that's pure colonialism. Also, Milosevic never had Israeli level of military supremacy, so he could not minimize collateral damage.

 
At 2:43 PM, Blogger Mytwords said...

I had to hear NPR this morning speaking up for the IDF's insistence that it had warned people to leave--even calling them on the phone (like those horror B-movies where the killer phones before coming to carve up his victims). It's really, really sad and makes me so angry.

 
At 3:44 PM, Blogger James-Speaks said...

"Question 1: In what way is the Israeli compaign in South Lebanon different from Slobodon Milosevic's campaign in Bosnia?"

The Israeli genocide has the approval, not too strong a word, of decision makers in the Bush White House.

"Question 2: Since Bush and Rice derailed any move toward a ceasefire of the sort that the entire rest of the world demanded, aren't they directly implicated in this bloodshed?"

Yes, they are directly implicated in this bloodshed. It can even be argued that since Israeli generals had Powerpoint presentations on the fantastical successes over a year ago, and that Israel needs its daily infusion of US cash to survive, then Bush and Rice hold a greater responsibility than as merely supporter or facilitators, that they are instigators.

Some questions of my own:

Q3: What was in that Powerpoint presentation?

Speculative Answer 3: Some judgments have to be made regarding Bush's abilities. It is likely that he would know a disastrous Lebanon destroying arial bombardment would seriously hurt his war in Iraq. It should be assumed he did not sign off on this flying clusterfuck.

Rather, I would bet the farm that the Israel geniuses explained in patient detail to Pres. Boy Wonder how a quick defeat of the feckless Hizbullah would so thoroughly dishearten the evil Sunni and Shia guerrillas in Iraq that Bush would be able to claim victory there, again, in time for the '06 elections.

Which raises another question.

Q4: Did the Israelis have a clue?

SA4: Well, didn't they? This is the same Hizbollah that drove them out of Lebanon six years ago. Did they really think that Hizbollah had given up all their arms? I think not. And since I do not believe this war started with a Hizbollah mission across the Israeli border, the only logical conclusion is that this whole incident cum war crime occurs now only because Israel wants it to occur now.

Q5: What?

SA5: Israel has long made it their practice to dishonor the borders of other nations. They do so diplomatically, gaining New Zealand passports for future false flag operations, or not, and they do so militarily. Just ask any US employee of Aramco how often the IAF does touch-and-go's on Saudi soil.

Hizbollah, on the other hand, has always made it their practice to deliver reciprocal animosity. Israel shells their villages. Hizbollah launches a few towards "The Light Unto Nations." Always measured responses. Rarely provocational.

MSNBC originally reported that IDF soldiers had been killed inside Lebanon. The IDF tank was destroyed inside Lebanon. Israel started this war just as Israel always used provocation to start the Palestinian conflicts.

Its their way, the way of the coward, to always blame the other side. Hitler did it. Israel does it.

Q6: What? What?

SA6: Israel started this war. Israel may also have harbored dark hopes they could subdue Hizbollah, even minimally, and claim to Pres. Boy Wonder they had helped, but one must consider the other side, that Israel expects there to be side benefits to a short term quagmire.

Q7: Side benefits?

SA7: Yes. One would be exactly what we are seeing now. An excuse to ruin the Lebanese economy. Israel understands that its future enemy is not the Arabs, but Peak Oil. Israel needs to be the most powerful economy in the region. It is thoroughly evil, and not unlike their activities in Gaza, for Israel to plan to destroy the economy of Lebanon because that is their goal.

Q8: But doesn't this hurt Bush?

SA8: Yes. This does hurt Bush. The neocons have used Bush and now they intend to throw him away. How do you throw away an American President? You do so by luring him into a web, such as War Crimes, from which he cannot escape.

The phony defections of certain neo-conservatives from the Republican party are consistent with this planning. Since they never were conservatives to begin with, merely Israeli operatives who used the label "liberal" so long as it was useful, it is no wonder they need to find ways to leave the Repuiblicans behind and find a new label to use. Ergo: implicate Bush in Israeli war crimes. Ergo: eventually try to blame the whole thing on Republicans as they, the Israeli fifth column, seeks new political ground in America.

Q9: What next?

SA9: Expect Israel to try to destroy as much of the Lebanese society as they can. It is their hope that Hizbollah will be so busy rebuilding that the Lebanese economy cannot challenge Israel's for a decade.

Expect Israel to fail. Sunnis in oil rich kingdoms may take umbrage and decide to use their oil to punish Israel, or us.

 
At 7:47 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

The AP is reporting that Grand Ayatollah Sistani has reacted to the massacre at Qana by calling for an immediate end of Israeli assault on Lebanon, and he is holding U.S. to account for it:

(Quote)
Iraq's top Shiite cleric Sunday demanded an immediate cease-fire in Lebanon, warning the Muslim world will "not forgive" nations that stand in the way of stopping the fighting.

Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani issued the call following the Israeli airstrike that killed at least 56 Lebanese, mostly women and children, in the village of Qana. It was the deadliest attack in nearly three weeks of fighting.

"Islamic nations will not forgive the entities that hinder a cease-fire," al-Sistani said, in a clear reference to the United States.

"It is not possible to stand helpless in front of this Israeli aggression on Lebanon," he added. "If an immediate cease-fire in this Israeli aggression is not imposed, dire consequences will befall the region."
(End Quote)

Israel's magnanimous 48-hour aerial cease fire notwithstanding, I wonder how long Iraqi Shiites will sit idly by and watch their brethren in Lebanon being slaughtered by American weapons launched with impunity by Israel?

At what point will Sistani join Muqtada al-Sadr's call for attacks on U.S. troops? I fear that the moment may be fast approaching, given the rising local pressure on Sistani for concrete action.

 
At 7:48 PM, Blogger sherm said...

Its interesting that all of the Lebanon/Israeli peace plans offered by the West call for Lebanon to essentially yield sovereignty on a swath of land along its border, and disarm Hezbollah.

Given that Israel is the overwhelming aggressor in this action - to the extent of near total destruction of large parts of the country - wouldn't it make moral sense for the buffer zone to be on Israel's side of the border, and some sort of arms control be imposed on Israel.

As pointed out in other posts and links the Israeli/Lebanon border has been rather peaceful since 2000. Hezbollah has nt been raining death and destruction on Israel. Yet all the cease fire and peace plans call for Lebanon to give things up - things determined by Israel.

So the black limo, tailored suit, experts and leaders are telling us that destruction of Lebanon is a proper and necessary reaction to the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers. Therefore it is only Israel that can have legitimate grievances when the dust settles.

 
At 9:09 PM, Blogger Arun said...

Jonathan Cook says that on Israeli TV, nothing is shown. Israeli civilians may be somewhat unaware of what is being done in their name, unless they tune into foreign channels.

The Israeli media, of course, are the key to providing the second half of that equation – or rather not providing it. You can sit watching the main Israeli channels all day, flicking between channels 1, 2, and 10, and not see a Lebanese face, apart from that of Hassan Nasrallah, the new Hitler. I don't mean the charred faces of corpses, or the bandaged babies, or the amputees lying in hospital beds. I mean any Lebanese faces. Just as you almost never see a Palestinian face on Israeli TV unless they are the mob, disfigured with hatred as they hold aloft another martyr on his way to burial.

Lebanon only swings in to view on Israeli television through the black and white footage of an aerial gun sight, or through the long shot of a distant urban landscape seconds before it is "pulverized" by a dropped bomb. The buildings crumble, flames shoot up, clouds of dust billow into the air. Another shot of arcade-game adrenaline.

 
At 10:05 PM, Blogger laminar_flow said...

Qana 1996-Dedeux.

 
At 10:12 PM, Blogger Frank Staheli said...

How is your perspective tempered by what is being reported by Israeli National News--that Hizballah terrorists are using mosques to store their weapons, that Hizballah has refused to allow civilians to leave villages in order to use them as human shields, and that deliberate Hizballah tactics were the actual cause of the death of four United Nations observers a few days ago?

 
At 11:21 PM, Blogger Dancewater said...

"Since Bush and Rice derailed any move toward a ceasefire of the sort that the entire rest of the world demanded, aren't they directly implicated in this bloodshed?"

Yes, and Blair also.

go to http://informationclearinghouse.info/article14258.htm
and watch the video "More Time to Bomb"

It shows Blair not responding to reporters questions about not calling for a ceasefire. It was filmed several days ago.

 
At 12:29 AM, Blogger Srebrenica Genocide said...

For more on Qana massacre, read this:

http://srebrenica-genocide.blogspot.com

Don't forget to comment!

 
At 1:34 AM, Blogger Daniel said...

Words cannot convey the disgust I feel for the massacre in Qana.

But worse is the horror that the massacre reveals about human beings. We are no better than savages except, instead of spears and swords, we use weapons that only fiendish minds could create.

Qana is an indictment not only of Israel and America but of the whole human specie. We are, collectively, a destructive scourge.

We do not deserve our place among other living things.

 
At 4:13 PM, Blogger Phoenix Woman said...

I just wanted to note the following:

When Pope Benedict comes out with an anti-gay, anti-woman, or anti-abortion pronouncement, all the US evening TV news shows (where most Americans still get the majority of their knowledge of the world) dutifully carry it.

But until I saw the link here in this post on Professor Cole's blog, I had no idea that Benedict had recently called for a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. I guess this somehow wasn't considered important enough for FOX or the other TV networks.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home