Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

39 Killed
Sunni Arabs demand War Reparations from US


At least 39 Iraqis were killed in guerrilla violence on Monday, the third anniversary of the US invasion. Guerrillas killed 10 policemen in separate bomb attacks, as well as hitting a cafe, killing 3 and wounding 23. There was also an attack on officials of the oil refinery at Beiji. A minibus carrying Shiite pilgrims was bombed, killing 4. But the massive gathering of devotees at Karbala went off safely.

Some 18 bodies were found, victims of night-time sectarian reprisals. One of the victims was a 13-year-old girl. It looks and smells like a civil war, folks.

Wire services report fighting between US forces and guerrillas in Ramadi.

Al-Zaman says that the Association of Muslim Scholars (hard line Sunni clerics) issued a communique on the third anniversary of the war, saying, "The American plan has failed" and warning Iraqi forces that they "should not fool themselves that they are battling terrorists who have arrived from abroad."

The text says, "Everyone must realize that the American plan has failed in Iraq. We demand not just the withdrawal of Occupation troops in accordance with a timetable agrred upon with the United Nations but also that reparations be paid for the losses attendant on this attack."

Al-Zaman/ AFP reports that Kurds celebrating Now-Ruz on the new year's day of the vernal equinox, and the Shiites in Karbala, both seemed uninterested in commemorating the anniversary.

The negotiations about the new government have been postponed for one week because of the Kurdish Now-Ruz (New Year's Day) and the Shiite Arba'in, the fortieth day commemoration of the death of Imam Husayn, the grandson of the prophet.

Al-Zaman reports that Shiite clerical leader Abdul Aziz al-Hakim is agitating again for provincial confederacies in the Shiite south. He instisted it wouldn't break up the country. He also advocates unleashing the Badr Corps (the Iran-trained paramilitary of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq) against the Sunni Islami radicals.

Those who see the Kurdish regions of Iraq as havens of relative peace and prosperity seldom reckon with its less savory characteristics. The regional government often functions as a police state.

Pretty much everyone agrees by now that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld must go, that he has been incompetent and egoistic and callous. But no one ever brings up the question of whether the situation in Iraq can get any better as long as Rumsfeld is in office. He makes Pentagon policy. He makes bad, even catastrophic policy. Ergo, Rumsfeld in office equals looming disaster.

The Sunni Arab guerrillas, according to ABC, are media savvy and fighting a "mosaic war."

Chris Allbritton explores whether the Iraqi police are infiltrated with death squads and making things worse, not better.

13 Comments:

At 6:47 AM, Blogger Dr Victorino de la Vega said...

- Juan,

You say « [Rumsfeld] makes Pentagon policy. He makes bad, even catastrophic policy. Ergo, Rumsfeld in office equals looming disaster » and I couldn’t agree more.

Because of his unabashed bluntness, Donald Rumsfeld has become the most visible symptom of a general decline in morality affecting Washington and the country at large: he will be remembered by future generations as the chief choreographer of Abu Ghraib’s torture chambers…

And Abu Ghraib’s unknown Iraqi soldier on the box will forever remain a very powerful symbol of the cruel bestiality of the Neocon Neros of Washington and TeX-Aviv: the hood is a fitting metaphor for the blindness of KKK nostalgics and other Southern Evangelical revivalists such as former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and Texan-In-Chief George W. Bush.

As for the electrical wires attached to the detainee’s outstretched arms, they are the technological embodiment of a Western civilization gone awry, a once glorious culture caricatured and debased by those who now speak and act in its name: machine-men and scientific cynics who believe in “harnessing the power of new technologies” to torture, kill and maim in the name of “liberty”...

 
At 9:19 AM, Blogger Cervantes said...

For some reason I haven't seen this covered elsewhere. NPR news reported last night on the incident in Duluiya on Sunday. Iraqi police (!) are claiming that U.S. soldiers entered a house, herded the entire family into one room, and systematically executed them with gunshots to the head -- including an infant. Apparently a visiting relative was alleged to be an al Qaeda "operative," who they detained. CentCom says it's investigating but finds this implausible.

Whatever the truth, that the Iraqi police are making this claim (and the townspeople evidently believe it according to the NPR story) it is obviously not a good sign for the U.S. project in Iraq (whatever exactly it is which is still not clear to me). Any response to this?

 
At 9:49 AM, Blogger yapchongyee said...

The civil war in Iraq is in "top-gear" and President Bush and his GANG need not bother to put a spin to it; it will be futile. However, according to an article that was suggested by one of your bloggers, one "catinthehat"; it is indeed the case for Bush to crow, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED". the article argues & indeed even says that he has his hands on a copy of a PENTAGON REPORT that reports that that was what Bush wants. Bush & his gang wants to reduce available oil in the market to boost the price of oil in the market place. That indeed is what has happened today. SO IT WAS NOT ABOUT TAKING DEMOCRACY TO IRAQ BUT MORE TO PROFITEER, THAT WAS THE BUSH GAME PLAN. What a crook.

The point that I want to make in this post is that there is nothing that the USA can do to save the imminent disaster that is well on the way to become the mother of all disaster. The objective of all guerrilla war-fare is to make the occupier BLEED both in lives & in national treasure. The USA cannot continue to hope that their GIs ensconced in the safety of the green zone will be out of harm's way; think again !

A bomb exploded in a hotel by the efforts of one freedom fighter will bring in an American battalion of GIs supported by helicopters and a hundred humvees; HOW MUCH WILL IT COST THE US OCCUPIERS TO TRACK THE SUSPECT ? The USA & indeed any occupier at all cannot win an insurgency. The bigger you are the harder you will fail. Too many GIs will cost too much for American health.

EVIL BEGETS EVIL ! AMERICA IS GOING BROKE !

 
At 9:57 AM, Blogger John Koch said...

No, Rummy should lead DoD right up to the end. That way, all credit or blame will fall right where it belongs.

Besides, what self-respecting person would want to take his place? Rummy's successor would have to uphold all the same "stay the course" talking points, stake all hopes on development of reliable Iraqi security forces, and bear all the risks of futher surprises, disgraces, and catastrophes. Even professed believers in the mission would have serious qualms. Only the unscrupulous would overlook these hazards ("OK, two years at DoD, come what may, then back to a comfy Board position at Halliburton or Bechtel," etc).

Ditto for Dick, Karl, Condi, and the rest. Keep them in place all the way to the next innauguration day in 2009. Keep all the lines of responsiblity clear.

 
At 12:40 PM, Blogger Dancewater said...

Allbritton and others are presenting the "news" that the Iraqi police and military are infiltrated with death squads. This has been know for quite a while.

Last September 26, I and a friend went into each and every US Senator's office and handed them a picture of a young Iraqi boy who was sitting on the back of a pick up truck with his family. The entire family was killed in their home the night before by Iraqi police. He survived by hiding under blankets.

Now, he was only 10, but he knew what happened. He knew they were Iraqis, wearing police uniforms and driving police vehicles.

This is not "new" news at all. The only unknown is did Negroponte trained and supplied them.




And next comes the regional war. God, I hope I am wrong for once.

 
At 2:05 PM, Blogger Sulayman said...

If Abdul-Aziz Al-Hakim is insisting that a confederation will NOT break up the country, what is the reason he's giving? Does he have any rationale for believing that Iraq will stay unified? I can't read Az-Zaman's article in Arabic, and their English edition is a few days old.

 
At 7:18 PM, Blogger sherm said...

Words from Bush at his 3/21/06 press conference:
"I also saw a threat in Iraq. I was hoping to solve this problem diplomatically. That's why I went to the Security Council. That's why it was important to pass 1441, which was unanimously passed. And the world said, Disarm, disclose or face serious consequences. And therefore, we worked with the world. We worked to make sure that Saddam Hussein heard the message of the world. And when he chose to deny the inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had the difficult decision to make to remove him."

The fact was that, according to the final CIA report on WMD, there were no WMD in Iraq since 1991.

The fact was that the UN inspectors had a pretty free hand prior to the invasion. The CIA gave them a long list of the most probable WMD sites and nothing was ever found when these sites were investigated. About 500 sites were visited. Colin Powell was dead wrong on every single WMD claim he made at the UN. Every time some Iraqi functionary said "we ain't got no WMD" he or she was telling the truth. To bad the CIA is only trained to detect lies (other than those uttered by Whitehouse).

There had to be a few CIA analysts that screamed "we were wrong!!" prior to the invasion. Surely that was a carreer ending statement if said too loud.

So Bush is telling us today that the invasion, occupation, and destruction of lives, property and social fabric could have been avoided if Saddam had dissarmed, which he already did in 1991. That means that all this business about freedom and democracy was of little importance to Bush in 2003. You could speculate that that is still the case.

 
At 8:26 PM, Blogger Rafael said...

Sabri, the man that new enough!

Countdown is breaking the news that the former Iraqi Foreign Minister was a paid informant for the CIA (via those treacherous French bast....)and for the most part supplied more accurate info than what the CIA had available. The reporting also reveals that he was, not surprisingly, ignored.

 
At 10:44 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

NYT. JEFFREY GETTLEMAN. Iraqi Insurgents Attack Jail, Killing 18 and Freeing Prisoners
More than 200 masked insurgents stormed an Interior Ministry jail at daybreak on Tuesday, killing at least 18 police officers, freeing all the prisoners and leaving the facility a smoldering wreck.

The battle raged for nearly an hour at the jail, in Muqdadiya, 60 miles northeast of Baghdad, as the fighters blasted government buildings with mortars, grenades and machine guns, Interior Ministry officials said.

The attack demonstrated that even though sectarian violence has recently emerged as Iraq's gravest concern, the antigovernment insurgency is far from over.

Showing a high degree of sophistication, insurgents reportedly cut telephone lines and then detonated several roadside bombs to block reinforcement troops from reaching the jail.

 
At 11:08 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

Operation "Successor"

Neocons know all too well what kind of legacy next president will have to deal with. So they are unopologetically delusional.

Fred Barnes. A "Third Term" for Bush

The president's most spectacular move would be to anoint a presidential successor. This would require Vice President Cheney to resign. His replacement? Condoleezza Rice, whom Bush regards highly. Her replacement? Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, whose Bush-like views on Iraq and the war on terror have made him a pariah in the Democratic caucus.

 
At 12:12 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

I just watched Jon Stewart interview former Iraqi Air Force Gen. Georges Sada, who claims that Iraq's WMD were flown to Syria before the invasion...

This is the first time I have heard of this Iraqi General - is he part of the Chalabi crowd of misinformation specialists? My hunch here is that he defected to the West and has been spreading propaganda on behalf of the neocons.

Anyone wants to add more information on this person?

 
At 12:21 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

Abhinav Aima said... I just watched Jon Stewart interview former Iraqi Air Force Gen. Georges Sada, who claims that Iraq's WMD were flown to Syria before the invasion... This is the first time I have heard of this Iraqi General - is he part of the Chalabi crowd of misinformation specialists? My hunch here is that he defected to the West and has been spreading propaganda on behalf of the neocons.

Gen.Sada popped up in late January, you can check my IWMD blog on this.

 
At 3:46 PM, Blogger Daniel said...

Linkmeister,

That's a pretty glowing and self-serving biography. Considering it is presumably used to pump him up before he speaks at paid-events, I'm going to be dubious of it.

I'm having a lot of trouble finding any mention of this guy prior to his book coming out. He's definitely in bed with the neo-cons, as a member of the PGA and a born-again Christian.

My guess is he just muddies the water some more. He makes some specious claims, that support the Bush agenda, ones which are of course unprovable and difficult to disprove and he has a resume that gives him a grain of credibility as a former Air-Force general under Saddam.

Would Saddam's generals know about his chemical weapons program? I don't know. It's plausible an Air Force General would. Then again, he hadn't worked for Saddam from 1991 on. So he did not have 1st hand knowledge of this move.

Most of the links google provides talking about this guy are right wingers crowing about how he vindicates the whole Iraq debacle and some cautious doubts raised by others wondering how legit this is.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home