Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, December 25, 2005

Iraqi Christians in Peril this Christmas

Because of the poor security, Iraqi Christians had to celebrate midnight mass at sundown instead. Many Christians have fled Iraq for Syria and elsewhere, while others are afraid to go to the churches, which have been targeted in the past by bombers. (Ironically, the secular Arab nationalist regimes like the Syrian Baath have typically been favorable to local Christians, since they downplay religious identity.

The year 2005 has not been kind to Iraqi Christians, who number around 700,000. Like all Iraqis, they face problems of insecurity, violence, and kidnapping. But they are sometimes unfairly targeted as pro-Western. About 80 percent of Iraqi Christians are Uniate Catholics or Chaldeans, who acknowledge the Pope but have their own liturgy. Pope John Paul II, it should be remembered, opposed the Iraq War. The other 20 percent are Assyrians, rooted in a historical legacy of the Nestorian, Aramaic-using church of the Near East, though most of these have moved away from classical Nestorian theology (which emphasized the humanity of Jesus of Nazareth and refused to recognize the Mother Mary as the "mother of God.") These are old, local churches.

The political events of 2005 often harmed the interests of the Chaldean and Assyrian Christians. The ballot boxes they should have received in their region of Ninevah in the north for the Jan. 30 elections often never arrived. They also alleged that they were slighted unfairly in the recent Dec. 15 polls. At some 3 percent of the population, they would ideally have 8 or so seats in the parliament, but do not.

The constitution forged in summer of 2005 and approved in a referendum on Oct. 15 makes Islam the religion of state in Iraq and says that the civil parliament may pass no legislation that contravenes Islamic law. Chaldeans and Assyrians vehemently protested these provisions, to no avail. They were especially concerned that the constitution likely makes it illegal for Muslims to convert to Christianity, and therefore puts Christians in legal peril if they are responsible for such conversions. It may also be that some Christian sentiments about Islam will be regarded as blasphemous, as has happened in nearby Pakistan.

Iraq's Christians have also often been disadvantaged by the movement of Kurds into northern Iraq and Kurdish hopes of annexing much of Kirkuk and Ninevah to Kurdistan. There is often tension between Iraqi Christians and the Kurds because of these territorial issues.

The Chaldeans are deeply worried about their future. They are concerned with the likely impact on their community of emigration (because of the bad security) and of the rise in Iraq of political Islam. They are also profoundly fearful and resentful of evangelical Protestant targeting of their members for conversion. (In modern Middle Eastern history, Presbyterians and Baptists have on a number of occasions launched a big push to convert Muslims, which invariably failed miserably, after which the missionaries turned their attention to local Eastern Orthodox, Catholic and other Middle Eastern Christians).

It seems clear that the new order that Bush has brought to Iraq holds substantial perils for the indigenous Iraqi Christian community.

4 Comments:

At 9:15 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Christian fundamentalists should of course be rethinking their fervent support of this American regime which has so completely manipulated and seduced them...but they won't.

 
At 10:32 AM, Blogger Frankly, my dear, ... said...

Well, yes, it could have happened. But that's just what makes it useful for the student. This is just a variation on the "the dog ate my homework" theme. It's end of term and the term assignment isn't finished. "The dog ate my homework" won't fly, but "the FBI took my homework" will.

The fault here lies with the professors who repeated hearsay to the media without investigating. So instead of the student getting kudos for the best "why my term paper isn't finished" story, the student, the professors, and the university become a national embarrassment.

 
At 11:22 AM, Blogger Patrick Berry said...

Iraq is the new case study in "unintended consequences."

 
At 9:43 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

The biggest letdown of this weekend's news coverage for me was tonight's CBS 60 Minutes report "The New Beirut" primarily because of its incomplete and purely anti-Syrian focus...

All the material presented in the program was newsworthy and important, but there was no attempt to examine other facets of the situation in Lebanon...

While the program included the views of anti-Syrian Lebanese leaders like Saad Hariri and Walid Jumblatt, there was no interview with any Shiite leaders, whether from Amal or Hizbollah, thereby creating the false impression that Lebanese leaders uniformly believe Syria to the the cause of all problems in Lebanon.

While the program reported allegations against Syria and mentioned the Lebanese "civil war" there was no mention of Israel - not even once - even though Israel funded and armed militias in the Lebanese war, and twice invaded Lebanon (in 1978 and 1982) and continued to occupy swathes of Lebanese territory till May 2000.

There was also no mention of the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon - they remain invisible.

And while there was misty-eyed discussion of Lebanon's future, no mention was made of the Iraq war, which has a tremendous bearing on the radicalization of anti-Israel and anti-American Lebanese and Palestinian groups.

All in all, the program was a great bit of propaganda for the anti-Syria forces because it was so inherently one sided.

I am not saying that the anti-Syria voices should not have been reported - they are a very real part of Lebanese politics. But I am saying that reporting them in such a propagandistic one-sided manner is both subjective and misleading when it comes to addressing the reality of The New Beirut.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home